Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bridging Quantum Computing and Differential Privacy: Insights into Quantum Computing Privacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.09173 v3 pith:NPF52DBS submitted 2024-03-14 quant-ph cs.CR

Bridging Quantum Computing and Differential Privacy: Insights into Quantum Computing Privacy

classification quant-ph cs.CR
keywords quantumprivacycomputingdifferentialalgorithmclassicalimplementationsused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While quantum computing has strong potential in data-driven fields, the privacy issue of sensitive or valuable information involved in the quantum algorithm should be considered. Differential privacy (DP), which is a fundamental privacy tool widely used in the classical scenario, has been extended to the quantum domain, i.e., quantum differential privacy (QDP). QDP may become one of the most promising approaches toward privacy-preserving quantum computing since it is not only compatible with classical DP mechanisms but also achieves privacy protection by exploiting unavoidable quantum noise in noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. This paper provides an overview of the various implementations of QDP and their performance in terms of privacy parameters under the DP setting. Specifically, we propose a taxonomy of QDP techniques, categorizing the literature on whether internal or external randomization is used as a source to achieve QDP and how these implementations are applied to each phase of the quantum algorithm. We also discuss challenges and future directions for QDP. By summarizing recent advancements, we hope to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date review for researchers venturing into this field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A conditional no-go for resource-free magic-axis measurement on a static surface code

    eess.SY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Under three stated assumptions, a resource-free static surface-code patch cannot sharply measure the magic axis at polynomial acceptance; it must pay with a resource, leave the dilute regime, or accept exponentially rarely.