Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Safety Analysis of Autonomous Railway Systems: An Introduction to the SACRED Methodology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12114 v1 pith:NMGWC3KH submitted 2024-03-18 cs.SE cs.AI

Safety Analysis of Autonomous Railway Systems: An Introduction to the SACRED Methodology

classification cs.SE cs.AI
keywords safetyanalysisrailwaysacredsystemsautonomousintroducemethodology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

As the railway industry increasingly seeks to introduce autonomy and machine learning (ML), several questions arise. How can safety be assured for such systems and technologies? What is the applicability of current safety standards within this new technological landscape? What are the key metrics to classify a system as safe? Currently, safety analysis for the railway reflects the failure modes of existing technology; in contrast, the primary concern of analysis of automation is typically average performance. Such purely statistical approaches to measuring ML performance are limited, as they may overlook classes of situations that may occur rarely but in which the function performs consistently poorly. To combat these difficulties we introduce SACRED, a safety methodology for producing an initial safety case and determining important safety metrics for autonomous systems. The development of SACRED is motivated by the proposed GoA-4 light-rail system in Berlin.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MATRIX: Multi-Agent simulaTion fRamework for safe Interactions and conteXtual clinical conversational evaluation

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    MATRIX combines a structured safety taxonomy, an LLM hazard judge, and a patient simulator to benchmark clinical dialogue agents, claiming expert-level hazard detection and revealing weak emergency handling in current LLMs.