Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Language Models in Dialogue: Conversational Maxims for Human-AI Interactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.15115 v2 pith:RGSLHGXL submitted 2024-03-22 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HC

Language Models in Dialogue: Conversational Maxims for Human-AI Interactions

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.HC
keywords maximshuman-aimodelsconversationalinteractionslanguagebenevolenceconcerning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Modern language models, while sophisticated, exhibit some inherent shortcomings, particularly in conversational settings. We claim that many of the observed shortcomings can be attributed to violation of one or more conversational principles. By drawing upon extensive research from both the social science and AI communities, we propose a set of maxims -- quantity, quality, relevance, manner, benevolence, and transparency -- for describing effective human-AI conversation. We first justify the applicability of the first four maxims (from Grice) in the context of human-AI interactions. We then argue that two new maxims, benevolence (concerning the generation of, and engagement with, harmful content) and transparency (concerning recognition of one's knowledge boundaries, operational constraints, and intents), are necessary for addressing behavior unique to modern human-AI interactions. We evaluate the degree to which various language models are able to understand these maxims and find that models possess an internal prioritization of principles that can significantly impact their ability to interpret the maxims accurately.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enjoy Your Talk: A Human-Centered Benchmark for Multi-Turn Dialogue with Decoupled User Simulation, Target Modeling, and Judging

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A three-party-decoupled multi-turn chat benchmark finds closed and open models nearly tied on subjective empathy/persona scores but separated by up to 9× on objective intent tracking, with reasoning and persona format...

  2. Enjoy Your Talk: A Human-Centered Benchmark for Multi-Turn Dialogue with Decoupled User Simulation, Target Modeling, and Judging

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A 17-model benchmark with a decoupled simulator/judge design finds frontier chatbots indistinguishable on subjective warmth but sharply separated on long-horizon intent tracking, with a reasoning-mode gain that appear...