Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

EPI-SQL: Enhancing Text-to-SQL Translation with Error-Prevention Instructions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14453 v1 pith:FYOS4OB2 submitted 2024-04-21 cs.CL cs.AIcs.DB

EPI-SQL: Enhancing Text-to-SQL Translation with Error-Prevention Instructions

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.DB
keywords epi-sqlllmsepisinstructionsperformancequeriestasktext-to-sql
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The conversion of natural language queries into SQL queries, known as Text-to-SQL, is a critical yet challenging task. This paper introduces EPI-SQL, a novel methodological framework leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the performance of Text-to-SQL tasks. EPI-SQL operates through a four-step process. Initially, the method involves gathering instances from the Spider dataset on which LLMs are prone to failure. These instances are then utilized to generate general error-prevention instructions (EPIs). Subsequently, LLMs craft contextualized EPIs tailored to the specific context of the current task. Finally, these context-specific EPIs are incorporated into the prompt used for SQL generation. EPI-SQL is distinguished in that it provides task-specific guidance, enabling the model to circumvent potential errors for the task at hand. Notably, the methodology rivals the performance of advanced few-shot methods despite being a zero-shot approach. An empirical assessment using the Spider benchmark reveals that EPI-SQL achieves an execution accuracy of 85.1\%, underscoring its effectiveness in generating accurate SQL queries through LLMs. The findings indicate a promising direction for future research, i.e. enhancing instructions with task-specific and contextualized rules, for boosting LLMs' performance in NLP tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Static Rules: Automated Discovery of Latent Vulnerabilities in Text-to-SQL

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    An evolving Vulnerability Codex plus hypothesis-driven perturbations exposes latent Text-to-SQL failures in LLMs far better than fixed expert rules, with transferable patterns and early remediation gains.

  2. Adapt to Thrive! Adaptive Power-Mean Policy Optimization for Improved LLM Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    APMPO boosts average Pass@1 scores on math reasoning benchmarks by 3 points over GRPO by using an adaptive power-mean policy objective and feedback-driven clipping bounds in RLVR training.

  3. Free Energy-Driven Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Advantage Shaping for Unsupervised Reasoning in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FREIA applies free energy principles and adaptive advantage shaping to unsupervised RL, outperforming baselines by 0.5-3.5 Pass@1 points on math reasoning with a 1.5B model.