Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fusion of Domain-Adapted Vision and Language Models for Medical Visual Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.16192 v1 pith:QGM7CT3W submitted 2024-04-24 cs.CL cs.CV

Fusion of Domain-Adapted Vision and Language Models for Medical Visual Question Answering

classification cs.CL cs.CV
keywords medicalmodelmodelsperformancevisualaccuracydatasetdomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-language models, while effective in general domains and showing strong performance in diverse multi-modal applications like visual question-answering (VQA), struggle to maintain the same level of effectiveness in more specialized domains, e.g., medical. We propose a medical vision-language model that integrates large vision and language models adapted for the medical domain. This model goes through three stages of parameter-efficient training using three separate biomedical and radiology multi-modal visual and text datasets. The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on the SLAKE 1.0 medical VQA (MedVQA) dataset with an overall accuracy of 87.5% and demonstrates strong performance on another MedVQA dataset, VQA-RAD, achieving an overall accuracy of 73.2%.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DentiAsk: A VQA Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning in Panoramic Dental Radiographs

    q-bio.QM 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    A 1,000-image, 10,000-QA dental VQA benchmark shows current VLMs handle descriptive recognition far better than spatial localization or numerical counting on panoramic radiographs.