REVIEW 1 cited by
On uncertainty-penalized Bayesian information criterion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On uncertainty-penalized Bayesian information criterion
read the original abstract
The uncertainty-penalized information criterion (UBIC) has been proposed as a new model-selection criterion for data-driven partial differential equation (PDE) discovery. In this paper, we show that using the UBIC is equivalent to employing the conventional BIC to a set of overparameterized models derived from the potential regression models of different complexity measures. The result indicates that the asymptotic property of the UBIC and BIC holds indifferently.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the post-hoc Evaluation of PDE Discovery: A Multifaceted Challenge of Scientific Advancement
The first broad taxonomy of post-hoc PDE-discovery metrics shows single scores mislead, and recommends multi-criteria evaluation with OOD and physics checks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.