pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.19237 · v2 · submitted 2024-04-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.str-el

Superconductivity from Quasiparticle Pairing of Intervalley Coherent State in Rhombohedral Trilayer Graphene

Chun Wang Chau , Shuai A. Chen , K. T. Law This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords superconductivityrhombohedral trilayer grapheneintervalley coherent statequasiparticle pairinggapped Dirac conestransition temperaturecoherence length
0
0 comments X

The pith

Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene arises from pairing quasiparticles of the adjacent intervalley coherent state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that superconductivity appears in a narrow doping window of rhombohedral trilayer graphene because quasiparticles from the neighboring intervalley coherent phase form pairs. Conventional BCS theory applied to the flavor-symmetric state predicts a coherence length two orders of magnitude longer than observed, given the large Fermi velocity and low carrier density. Modeling the intervalley coherent state as gapped Dirac cones with the chemical potential near the valence-band edge suppresses the quasiparticle density of states, producing a transition temperature and coherence length that match experiment without adjustable parameters.

Core claim

The rhombohedral trilayer graphene superconducting phase arises from the pairing of quasiparticles of the adjacent inter-valley coherent state. Using gapped Dirac cones with chemical potential close to the valence band edge yields Tc proportional to ε_D exp(-2/ρ_qp U) and ξ ∼ v/√(μ Tc) that align with measured values.

What carries the argument

Quasiparticle pairing within gapped Dirac cones of the intervalley coherent state, whose suppressed density of states sets the scale of Tc.

If this is right

  • Tc follows Tc ∝ ε_D exp(-2/ρ_qp U) with ρ_qp the suppressed density of states of the intervalley coherent quasiparticles.
  • Coherence length follows ξ ∼ v/√(μ Tc) instead of the conventional BCS relation.
  • The same microscopic model reproduces both Tc and ξ across the experimental doping window without parameter adjustment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same quasiparticle-pairing route may operate in other multilayer graphene systems that host intervalley coherent order.
  • Direct measurement of the quasiparticle density of states near the band edge would provide an independent test of the required suppression.

Load-bearing premise

The chemical potential sits close to the valence band edge inside the gapped Dirac cones of the intervalley coherent state.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic or transport data showing that the chemical potential lies far from the valence band edge, or that the quasiparticle density of states is not correspondingly suppressed, would remove the mechanism that produces the observed Tc and ξ.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.19237 by Chun Wang Chau, K. T. Law, Shuai A. Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the lattice structure of RTG. Note that only [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Predictions from the theory by assuming SC1 from normal metal phase. (a) The mean-field transition temperature (red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Predictions from the theory by assuming SC1 originates from pairing of quasiparticles in IVC phase: (a) mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Illustration of the energy scale and band structure for the toy model. The dashed area denote the energy range ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Superconductivity is observed in rhombohedral trilayer graphene in a narrow regime between the flavor-symmetric state and the symmetry breaking phase, which cannot be described by the conventional Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory. The measured coherence length, for instance, is roughly two orders of magnitude shorter than the value predicted by the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer relation based on the large fermi velocity and an extremely low charge carrier density of the flavor-symmetric phase. To resolve the discrepancies, we propose that the rhombohedral trilayer graphene superconducting phase arises from the pairing of quasiparticles of the adjacent inter-valley coherent state. We illustrate the superconducting phenomenology using gapped Dirac cones with the chemical potential $\mu$ close to the valence band's edge. Our findings indicate that the transition temperature $T_c$ obeys $T_c\propto \epsilon_D\exp(-2/\rho_\mathrm{qp}U)$ with the density of states $\rho_\mathrm{qp}$ of intervalley coherent state quasiparticles, which is much suppressed compared to predictions from the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory. The coherence length $\xi$ we predict behaves according to $\xi\sim v/\sqrt{\mu T_c}$ with $v$ being the velocity of Dirac cone. Applying our assumption to a microscopic model, our predictions align well with experimental data and effectively capture key measurable quantities such as the transition temperature $T_c$ and the coherence length $\xi$ without parameter fine-tuning.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene arises from quasiparticle pairing within the adjacent intervalley coherent (IVC) state rather than the flavor-symmetric metallic phase. Modeling the IVC state with gapped Dirac cones and placing the chemical potential μ near the valence-band edge suppresses the quasiparticle density of states ρ_qp, yielding Tc ∝ ε_D exp(−2/ρ_qp U) and ξ ∼ v/√(μ Tc). The authors state that applying this assumption to a microscopic model reproduces experimental Tc and ξ values without parameter fine-tuning.

Significance. If the central assumption is microscopically justified, the proposal supplies a concrete mechanism that reconciles the two-order-of-magnitude mismatch between the observed short coherence length and conventional BCS estimates based on the large Fermi velocity and low carrier density of the flavor-symmetric state. The explicit, falsifiable expressions for Tc and ξ constitute a strength that can be tested against further doping- or field-dependent measurements.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph describing the model): the claim that μ lies close to the valence-band edge is introduced as an assumption required to suppress ρ_qp sufficiently; no self-consistent determination of μ from the total carrier density of the IVC state or from the microscopic Hamiltonian is shown. If the solved microscopic model instead places μ near mid-gap, ρ_qp is no longer parametrically small and both the Tc formula and the ξ scaling revert to conventional BCS expectations, removing the resolution of the coherence-length discrepancy.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that predictions “align well with experimental data … without parameter fine-tuning” is not accompanied by an explicit fitting procedure, error analysis, or comparison table showing how the microscopic IVC solution determines ρ_qp, ε_D, and U independently of the measured Tc and ξ.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the Dirac velocity v and the cutoff ε_D should be defined once at first use and used consistently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important points about clarity in the abstract and the need for explicit documentation of the microscopic inputs. We address each below and will revise the manuscript to improve transparency while preserving the central claim that the IVC quasiparticle pairing mechanism accounts for the observed Tc and short coherence length.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph describing the model): the claim that μ lies close to the valence-band edge is introduced as an assumption required to suppress ρ_qp sufficiently; no self-consistent determination of μ from the total carrier density of the IVC state or from the microscopic Hamiltonian is shown. If the solved microscopic model instead places μ near mid-gap, ρ_qp is no longer parametrically small and both the Tc formula and the ξ scaling revert to conventional BCS expectations, removing the resolution of the coherence-length discrepancy.

    Authors: The abstract presents the μ placement as an illustrative assumption to derive the suppressed ρ_qp and resulting Tc, ξ scalings. In the body of the manuscript we apply the same framework to a microscopic model of the IVC state (with gap parameters and total filling fixed by the Hamiltonian), which self-consistently places μ near the valence-band edge for the relevant carrier densities. We will revise the abstract to state explicitly that the microscopic solution determines μ near the edge rather than mid-gap, thereby keeping ρ_qp parametrically small. Should the microscopic solution instead yield mid-gap μ, the mechanism would indeed revert to conventional BCS scaling and fail to resolve the coherence-length issue; our calculations indicate this does not occur. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that predictions “align well with experimental data … without parameter fine-tuning” is not accompanied by an explicit fitting procedure, error analysis, or comparison table showing how the microscopic IVC solution determines ρ_qp, ε_D, and U independently of the measured Tc and ξ.

    Authors: The quoted statement refers to using gap size ε_D, velocity v, and interaction strength U obtained directly from the microscopic IVC calculation (independent of measured Tc or ξ) to evaluate the analytic expressions for Tc and ξ. We will add a table (or supplementary section) that lists the microscopic inputs (ρ_qp, ε_D, U), the resulting predicted Tc and ξ, and direct numerical comparison to the experimental values, together with a brief discussion of uncertainties arising from the model parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation rests on explicit modeling assumption applied to standard BCS formulas

full rationale

The paper's central derivation begins with an explicitly stated modeling choice: gapped Dirac cones for the intervalley coherent state with chemical potential placed near the valence band edge to obtain a suppressed quasiparticle DOS. From this, the expressions Tc ∝ ε_D exp(-2/ρ_qp U) and ξ ∼ v/√(μ Tc) follow directly as adaptations of conventional BCS relations to the resulting ρ_qp; these are not shown to be equivalent to the inputs by construction, nor do they rely on self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or uniqueness theorems. The claim that the assumption applied to a microscopic model reproduces experimental Tc and ξ is presented as an outcome check rather than a tautology. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-referential definition or citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on the validity of a BCS-like pairing formula applied to quasiparticles whose density of states is taken from the intervalley coherent phase; the model assumes gapped Dirac cones with μ near the band edge.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption BCS pairing theory structure remains valid when applied to quasiparticles of the intervalley coherent state
    The exponential form for Tc is taken directly from conventional pairing theory but with a modified density of states.
invented entities (1)
  • quasiparticle pairing mechanism from intervalley coherent state no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the observed short coherence length and narrow superconducting regime
    New postulated pairing channel introduced to explain data that standard BCS cannot fit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5827 in / 1423 out tokens · 22380 ms · 2026-05-24T01:59:40.609070+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pair density wave in quarter metals from a repulsive fermionic interaction in graphene heterostructures: A renormalization group study

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Leading-order RG analysis shows repulsive interactions stabilize a chiral odd-parity pair density wave in quarter metals of chirally stacked graphene heterostructures.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Beyond band bottom 22

    Case 1: m ≫ TMF 17 a. Beyond band bottom 22

    work page

  2. [2]

    Superconductivity from Quasiparticle Pairing of Intervalley Coherent State in Rhombohedral Trilayer Graphene

    Case 2: TMF ≫ m 23 E. Discussion on pairing and time-reversal symmetry in IVC 24 I. INTRODUCTION Graphene heterostructures, in particular twisted bi- layer graphene, have been observed experimentally to host various strongly correlated phases [1–11]. How- ever, many of these heterostructures are difficult to re- alize in experiments due to structural inst...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature (London) 556, 80 (2018), arXiv:1802.00553 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moir´ e het- erostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020), arXiv:1907.00261 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 365, 605 (2019), arXiv:1901.03520 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    H. S. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, A. Thomson, Y. Choi, H. Kim, Z. Lin, I. Z. Wilson, X. Xu, J.-H. Chu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, and S. Nadj-Perge, Super- conductivity in metallic twisted bilayer graphene stabi- lized by WSe 2, Nature (London) 583, 379 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture (London) 556, 43 (2018), arXiv:1803.02342 [cond- mat.mes-hall]. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Su- perconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 574, 653 (2019), arXiv:1903.06513 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2019

  9. [10]

    Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059 (2019), arXiv:1808.07865 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [11]

    Kerelsky, L

    A. Kerelsky, L. J. McGilly, D. M. Kennes, L. Xian, M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, C. Dean, A. Rubio, and A. N. Pasupathy, Maxi- mized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 572, 95 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [12]

    Jiang, X

    Y. Jiang, X. Lai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Haule, J. Mao, and E. Y. Andrei, Charge order and broken rota- tional symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 573, 91 (2019), arXiv:1904.10153 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [13]

    Y. Xie, B. Lian, B. J¨ ack, X. Liu, C.-L. Chiu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Spec- troscopic signatures of many-body correlations in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 572, 101 (2019), arXiv:1906.09274 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [14]

    X. Lin, D. Liu, and D. Tom´ anek, Shear instability in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195432 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [15]

    X. Lin, K. Su, and J. Ni, Misalignment instability in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride, 2D Materials 8, 025025 (2021), arXiv:2011.01541 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [16]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity in rhombohedral tri- layer graphene, Nature (London) 598, 434 (2021), arXiv:2106.07640 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [17]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, J. R. Ehrets, E. M. Spanton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, M. Serbyn, and A. F. Young, Half- and quarter-metals in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nature (London) 598, 429 (2021), arXiv:2104.00653 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [18]

    T. Arp, O. Sheekey, H. Zhou, C. L. Tschirhart, C. L. Patterson, H. M. Yoo, L. Holleis, E. Redekop, G. Babikyan, T. Xie, J. Xiao, Y. Vituri, T. Holder, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. E. Huber, E. Berg, and A. F. Young, Intervalley coherence and intrinsic spin- orbit coupling in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.03781 (2023), arXiv:...

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [19]

    Zhang, B

    F. Zhang, B. Sahu, H. Min, and A. H. MacDonald, Band structure of abc-stacked graphene trilayers, Phys. Rev. B 82, 035409 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [20]

    Trigonal warping and Berry's phase N pi in ABC-stacked multilayer graphene

    M. Koshino and E. McCann, Trigonal warping and Berry’s phase N π in ABC-stacked multilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165409 (2009), arXiv:0906.4634 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [21]

    Huang, T

    C. Huang, T. M. R. Wolf, W. Qin, N. Wei, I. V. Blinov, and A. H. MacDonald, Spin and orbital metallic mag- netism in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, L121405 (2023), arXiv:2203.12723 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [22]

    Zhumagulov, D

    Y. Zhumagulov, D. Kochan, and J. Fabian, Emer- gent correlated phases in rhombohedral trilayer graphene induced by proximity spin-orbit and ex- change coupling, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.14277 (2023), arXiv:2305.14277 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [23]

    J. M. Koh, J. Alicea, and E. Lantagne-Hurtubise, Corre- lated phases in spin-orbit-coupled rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035113 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [24]

    T. Wang, M. Vila, M. P. Zaletel, and S. Chatterjee, Elec- trical control of spin and valley in spin-orbit coupled graphene multilayers, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2303.04855 (2023), arXiv:2303.04855 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [25]

    C. H. Lui, Z. Li, K. F. Mak, E. Cappelluti, and T. F. Heinz, Observation of an electrically tunable band gap in trilayer graphene, Nature Physics 7, 944 (2011), arXiv:1105.4658 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [26]

    Y.-Z. Chou, F. Wu, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Acoustic-phonon-mediated superconductivity in moir´ eless graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 106, 024507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [27]

    Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A

    E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A. Fischer, J. B. Hauck, J. Zhang, D. M. Kennes, and A. Rubio, Phonon-mediated un- conventional s- and f-wave pairing superconductivity in rhombohedral stacked multilayer graphene, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2311.02494 (2023), arXiv:2311.02494 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [28]

    You and A

    Y.-Z. You and A. Vishwanath, Kohn-luttinger supercon- ductivity and intervalley coherence in rhombohedral tri- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 105, 134524 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [29]

    Ghazaryan, T

    A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, M. Serbyn, and E. Berg, Un- conventional Superconductivity in Systems with Annu- lar Fermi Surfaces: Application to Rhombohedral Tri- layer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 247001 (2021), arXiv:2109.00011 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [30]

    T. Cea, P. A. Pantale´ on, V. T. Phong, and F. Guinea, Superconductivity from repulsive interactions in rhombo- hedral trilayer graphene: A Kohn-Luttinger-like mecha- nism, Phys. Rev. B105, 075432 (2022), arXiv:2109.04345 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [31]

    Jimeno-Pozo, H

    A. Jimeno-Pozo, H. Sainz-Cruz, T. Cea, P. A. Pan- tale´ on, and F. Guinea, Superconductivity from electronic interactions and spin-orbit enhancement in bilayer and trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, L161106 (2023), arXiv:2210.02915 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [32]

    D.-C. Lu, T. Wang, S. Chatterjee, and Y.-Z. You, Correlated metals and unconventional superconductiv- ity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene: A renormaliza- tion group analysis, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155115 (2022), arXiv:2206.01213 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [33]

    W. Qin, C. Huang, T. Wolf, N. Wei, I. Blinov, and A. H. MacDonald, Functional Renormalization Group Study of Superconductivity in Rhombohedral Trilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 146001 (2023), arXiv:2203.09083 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [34]

    H. Dai, R. Ma, X. Zhang, T. Guo, and T. Ma, Quantum Monte Carlo study of superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene under an electric field, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245106 (2023), arXiv:2204.06222 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [35]

    Dong and L

    Z. Dong and L. Levitov, Superconductivity in the vicinity of an isospin-polarized state in a cubic Dirac band, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2109.01133 (2021), arXiv:2109.01133 10 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [36]

    Chatterjee, T

    S. Chatterjee, T. Wang, E. Berg, and M. P. Za- letel, Inter-valley coherent order and isospin fluctua- tion mediated superconductivity in rhombohedral tri- layer graphene, Nature Communications13, 6013 (2022), arXiv:2109.00002 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [37]

    A. L. Szab´ o and B. Roy, Metals, fractional metals, and superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 105, L081407 (2022), arXiv:2109.04466 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [38]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, Physical Review 108, 1175 (1957)

    work page 1957

  38. [39]

    See Supplemental Material

    work page

  39. [40]

    Electric Field Control of Soliton Motion and Stacking in Trilayer Graphene

    M. Yankowitz, J. I. J. Wang, A. G. Birdwell, Y.-A. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jacquod, P. San-Jose, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and B. J. Leroy, Electric field con- trol of soliton motion and stacking in trilayer graphene, Nature Materials 13, 786 (2014), arXiv:1401.7663 [cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [41]

    S. A. Chen and K. T. Law, Ginzburg-landau theory of flat-band superconductors with quantum metric, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 026002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [42]

    J.-X. Hu, S. A. Chen, and K. T. Law, Anoma- lous Coherence Length in Superconductors with Quan- tum Metric, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2308.05686 (2023), arXiv:2308.05686 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [43]

    X. Han, Q. Liu, Y. Wang, R. Niu, Z. Qu, Z. Wang, Z. Li, C. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Song, J. Mao, Z. V. Han, Z. Gan, and J. Lu, Chemical Potential Char- acterization of Symmetry-Breaking Phases in a Rhombo- hedral Trilayer Graphene, Nano Letters 23, 6875 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [44]

    Winterer, F

    F. Winterer, F. R. Geisenhof, N. Fernandez, A. M. Seiler, F. Zhang, and R. T. Weitz, Ferroelectric and anomalous quantum Hall states in bare rhombohedral tri- layer graphene, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.04950 (2023), arXiv:2305.04950 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [45]

    Stacking-Dependent Band Gap and Quantum Transport in Trilayer Graphene

    W. Bao, L. Jing, J. Velasco, Y. Lee, G. Liu, D. Tran, B. Standley, M. Aykol, S. B. Cronin, D. Smirnov, M. Koshino, E. McCann, M. Bockrath, and C. N. Lau, Stacking-dependent band gap and quantum trans- port in trilayer graphene, Nature Physics 7, 948 (2011), arXiv:1103.6088 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. 11 Appendix for “Origin of Superconductivity in Rhombohedral T...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [46]

    With all information, we can solve for δF . Due to stability of the mean-field solution, a linear correction has to vanish, and the lowest order term is thus second order in δ∆(k), namely F2 the Gaussian fluctuation of the free energy, given by: F2 = Z d2k (2π)2 U |δ∆(k)|2 − T 2 * Z β 0 dτ Z d2k (2π)2 δL !2+ = Z d2k (2π)2 U |δ∆(k)|2 − T 2 X n A Z d2q (2π)...

    work page

  46. [47]

    In particular, we will set it to µ = m + κϵD, and with 0 ≤ κ ≤ 1

    Case 1: m ≫ TMF In continuous model, we can treat the chemical potential as a free parameter. In particular, we will set it to µ = m + κϵD, and with 0 ≤ κ ≤ 1. To begin with we should write down our integral over momentum space in terms 18 of energy: Z d2q (2π)2 = Z m+(1+ν)ϵD m ϵ0dϵ0 2πv2 = Z ϵD −κϵD (ε + µ)dε 2πv2 . (D9) Considering the contribution from...

    work page

  47. [48]

    Case 2: TMF ≫ m In this scenario, most of the calculation is identical to the previous case, with the exception of χqm when µ ≈ m: 1 4 k2A Z ϵD 0 dε 2π 1 2 tanh β 2 ε 2ε (ε + µ) = 1 32π k2A Z ϵD 0 dε 1 µ 1 ε − 1 ε + µ tanh β 2 ε = 1 32π k2A Z ϵD 0 dε 1 µ 1 ε tanh β 2 ε − 1 16π k2A Z ϵD 0 dε 1 µ 1 ε + µ tanh β 2 ε ≈ 1 32π k2A 1 m Z ϵD 0 dε 1 ε tanh β 2 ε −...

    work page