Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15603 v3 pith:YBLT2AS6 submitted 2024-05-24 cs.LG physics.comp-ph

Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

classification cs.LG physics.comp-ph
keywords methodsnetworkskfaccurvatureneuralallowsapproximatecomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are infamous for being hard to train. Recently, second-order methods based on natural gradient and Gauss-Newton methods have shown promising performance, improving the accuracy achieved by first-order methods by several orders of magnitude. While promising, the proposed methods only scale to networks with a few thousand parameters due to the high computational cost to evaluate, store, and invert the curvature matrix. We propose Kronecker-factored approximate curvature (KFAC) for PINN losses that greatly reduces the computational cost and allows scaling to much larger networks. Our approach goes beyond the established KFAC for traditional deep learning problems as it captures contributions from a PDE's differential operator that are crucial for optimization. To establish KFAC for such losses, we use Taylor-mode automatic differentiation to describe the differential operator's computation graph as a forward network with shared weights. This allows us to apply KFAC thanks to a recently-developed general formulation for networks with weight sharing. Empirically, we find that our KFAC-based optimizers are competitive with expensive second-order methods on small problems, scale more favorably to higher-dimensional neural networks and PDEs, and consistently outperform first-order methods and LBFGS.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An Optimisation Framework for the Well-Conditioned Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DSGNAR optimization framework for PINNs reaches relative L2 errors of 3e-16 in double precision and improves prior results by 5-8 orders of magnitude on Burgers' and high-dimensional Poisson problems while remaining faster.

  2. Energy Manifold Natural Gradient Descent: Riemannian Optimization for Neural PDE Solvers

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Energy Manifold Natural Gradient Descent (EMNGD) defines the energy natural gradient on a Riemannian parameter manifold and proves it equals the energy-metric projection of the function-space Newton step.