Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Generalized Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms and Their Application to On-Line Portfolio Selection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00655 v1 pith:NSLWLRT3 submitted 2024-06-02 cs.LG cs.ITmath.ITq-fin.PM

Generalized Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms and Their Application to On-Line Portfolio Selection

classification cs.LG cs.ITmath.ITq-fin.PM
keywords gradientupdatesalgorithmsgeneralizedexponentiatedselectionegabflexibility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a novel family of generalized exponentiated gradient (EG) updates derived from an Alpha-Beta divergence regularization function. Collectively referred to as EGAB, the proposed updates belong to the category of multiplicative gradient algorithms for positive data and demonstrate considerable flexibility by controlling iteration behavior and performance through three hyperparameters: $\alpha$, $\beta$, and the learning rate $\eta$. To enforce a unit $l_1$ norm constraint for nonnegative weight vectors within generalized EGAB algorithms, we develop two slightly distinct approaches. One method exploits scale-invariant loss functions, while the other relies on gradient projections onto the feasible domain. As an illustration of their applicability, we evaluate the proposed updates in addressing the online portfolio selection problem (OLPS) using gradient-based methods. Here, they not only offer a unified perspective on the search directions of various OLPS algorithms (including the standard exponentiated gradient and diverse mean-reversion strategies), but also facilitate smooth interpolation and extension of these updates due to the flexibility in hyperparameter selection. Simulation results confirm that the adaptability of these generalized gradient updates can effectively enhance the performance for some portfolios, particularly in scenarios involving transaction costs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. M+Adam: Low-Precision Training via Additive-Multiplicative Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    M+Adam combines additive and multiplicative update branches, avoiding low-precision rounding stalls and improving LLaMA-style pretraining perplexity compared with AdamW at BF16, FP8, and FP4 master-weight storage.

  2. M+Adam: Low-Precision Training via Additive-Multiplicative Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Combining additive and multiplicative Adam-style updates yields stable BF16/FP8/FP4 master-weight training and lower C4 perplexity than AdamW on 60M–1B LLaMA-style models.