REVIEW 3 cited by
UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
UICoder: Finetuning Large Language Models to Generate User Interface Code through Automated Feedback
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) struggle to consistently generate UI code that compiles and produces visually relevant designs. Existing approaches to improve generation rely on expensive human feedback or distilling a proprietary model. In this paper, we explore the use of automated feedback (compilers and multi-modal models) to guide LLMs to generate high-quality UI code. Our method starts with an existing LLM and iteratively produces improved models by self-generating a large synthetic dataset using an original model, applying automated tools to aggressively filter, score, and de-duplicate the data into a refined higher quality dataset. The original LLM is improved by finetuning on this refined dataset. We applied our approach to several open-source LLMs and compared the resulting performance to baseline models with both automated metrics and human preferences. Our evaluation shows the resulting models outperform all other downloadable baselines and approach the performance of larger proprietary models.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Efficient Personalization of Generative User Interfaces
A dataset revealing high inter-designer disagreement on UI preferences motivates a sample-efficient method that personalizes generative interfaces by embedding new users in the space of prior designers, outperforming ...
-
Compass vs Railway Tracks: Unpacking User Mental Models for Communicating Long-Horizon Work to Humans vs. AI
Users treat human delegation for long tasks as a flexible compass but AI delegation as rigid railway tracks due to perceived AI limitations in inference and judgment.
-
Pattern over Pixels: Measuring Pattern Completion Bias in Multimodal Code Generation
On a new 1,440-screenshot fill-in-the-blank benchmark, five frontier multimodal models default to repeated UI patterns instead of visual deviations, with mean bias rates from 69.8% on card widths to 80.2% on font sizes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.