REVIEW 2 cited by
Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In the context of text classification, the financial burden of annotation exercises for creating training data is a critical issue. Active learning techniques, particularly those rooted in uncertainty sampling, offer a cost-effective solution by pinpointing the most instructive samples for manual annotation. Similarly, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 provide an alternative for automated annotation but come with concerns regarding their reliability. This study introduces a novel methodology that integrates human annotators and LLMs within an Active Learning framework. We conducted evaluations on three public datasets. IMDB for sentiment analysis, a Fake News dataset for authenticity discernment, and a Movie Genres dataset for multi-label classification.The proposed framework integrates human annotation with the output of LLMs, depending on the model uncertainty levels. This strategy achieves an optimal balance between cost efficiency and classification performance. The empirical results show a substantial decrease in the costs associated with data annotation while either maintaining or improving model accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Classifier That Teaches Itself: Self-Improving, Frozen-gate Training (SIFT) for Dynamic Document Classification
SIFT auto-trains a cheap classifier on LLM-judge write-backs and vetoes model updates that regress critical classes or a frozen golden set.
-
DocAnnot -- Accelerating the Creation of Key Information Extraction Datasets with GenAI-Powered Auto-annotation
DocAnnot combines an LVLM, OCR, and a spatial matching heuristic to auto-annotate KIE documents at F1 0.68–0.85, and models trained on that data reach roughly 0.68 F1 on CORD.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.