Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large Language Models are Biased Because They Are Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13138 v2 pith:SMP564OD submitted 2024-06-19 cs.CL cs.AI

Large Language Models are Biased Because They Are Large Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords languagelargemodelsbiasdesignharmfulllmsaddressed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This position paper's primary goal is to provoke thoughtful discussion about the relationship between bias and fundamental properties of large language models. I do this by seeking to convince the reader that harmful biases are an inevitable consequence arising from the design of any large language model as LLMs are currently formulated. To the extent that this is true, it suggests that the problem of harmful bias cannot be properly addressed without a serious reconsideration of AI driven by LLMs, going back to the foundational assumptions underlying their design.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BiasLab: A Multilingual Dual-Framing Framework for LLM Bias Measurement, Applied to Workplace and HR Contexts

    cs.CL 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0

    BiasLab uses mirrored affirmative/reverse prompt pairs across 12 languages to quantify directional preferences in 10 LLMs, claiming a systematic asymmetry between rejection and endorsement.