Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CaLMQA: Exploring culturally specific long-form question answering across 23 languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17761 v3 pith:TIIHF7IN submitted 2024-06-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords questionsculturallylanguagesanswerslong-formspecificacrosscalmqa
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite rising global usage of large language models (LLMs), their ability to generate long-form answers to culturally specific questions remains unexplored in many languages. To fill this gap, we perform the first study of textual multilingual long-form QA by creating CaLMQA, a dataset of 51.7K culturally specific questions across 23 different languages. We define culturally specific questions as those that refer to concepts unique to one or a few cultures, or have different answers depending on the cultural or regional context. We obtain these questions by crawling naturally-occurring questions from community web forums in high-resource languages, and by hiring native speakers to write questions in under-resourced, rarely-studied languages such as Fijian and Kirundi. Our data collection methodologies are translation-free, enabling the collection of culturally unique questions like "Kuber iki umwami wa mbere w'uburundi yitwa Ntare?" (Kirundi; English translation: "Why was the first king of Burundi called Ntare (Lion)?"). We evaluate factuality, relevance and surface-level quality of LLM-generated long-form answers, finding that (1) for many languages, even the best models make critical surface-level errors (e.g., answering in the wrong language, repetition), especially for low-resource languages; and (2) answers to culturally specific questions contain more factual errors than answers to culturally agnostic questions -- questions that have consistent meaning and answer across many cultures. We release CaLMQA to facilitate future research in cultural and multilingual long-form QA.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TyDi QA-WANA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Languages of West Asia and North Africa

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    TyDi QA-WANA is a new 28,000-example QA benchmark covering 10 under-represented languages with long-context, information-seeking questions and baseline evaluations.

  2. BenchHub: A Unified Benchmark Suite for Holistic and Customizable LLM Evaluation

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BenchHub is an automatically categorized, customizable LLM benchmark suite covering 303K questions across 38 benchmarks in English and Korean.

  3. The Multilingual Divide and Its Impact on Global AI Safety

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The language gap in AI models creates safety disparities across languages, and closing it requires funding multilingual datasets, transparency, and research.

Pith tools