Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

LLM-A*: Large Language Model Enhanced Incremental Heuristic Search on Path Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.02511 v2 pith:MMKIJCLP submitted 2024-06-20 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CL
keywords pathllm-apathfindingplanningvalidityalgorithmscomputationalglobal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Path planning is a fundamental scientific problem in robotics and autonomous navigation, requiring the derivation of efficient routes from starting to destination points while avoiding obstacles. Traditional algorithms like A* and its variants are capable of ensuring path validity but suffer from significant computational and memory inefficiencies as the state space grows. Conversely, large language models (LLMs) excel in broader environmental analysis through contextual understanding, providing global insights into environments. However, they fall short in detailed spatial and temporal reasoning, often leading to invalid or inefficient routes. In this work, we propose LLM-A*, an new LLM based route planning method that synergistically combines the precise pathfinding capabilities of A* with the global reasoning capability of LLMs. This hybrid approach aims to enhance pathfinding efficiency in terms of time and space complexity while maintaining the integrity of path validity, especially in large-scale scenarios. By integrating the strengths of both methodologies, LLM-A* addresses the computational and memory limitations of conventional algorithms without compromising on the validity required for effective pathfinding.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MobilityBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Route-Planning Agents in Real-World Mobility Scenarios

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MobilityBench is a 100,000-episode benchmark with a replay sandbox for deterministic evaluation of LLM route-planning agents; current models score well on basic tasks but fail preference-constrained routing.

  2. MARCO: Meta-Reflection with Cross-Referencing for Code Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MARCO combines cross-problem knowledge accumulation with cross-agent lesson sharing to improve LLM code reasoning at inference time.

  3. SCoTT: Strategic Chain-of-Thought Tasking for Wireless-Aware Robot Navigation in Digital Twins

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    SCoTT uses vision-language model prompts, in three subtasks, to plan wireless-aware robot paths from digital twin heatmaps; the reported near-optimality claim is not supported by the paper's own data.

  4. VLM-RRT: Vision Language Model Guided RRT Search for Autonomous UAV Navigation

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    VLM-RRT uses a vision-language model to bias RRT sampling toward a suggested direction, reporting fewer iterations and paths close to RRT* in simulated 2D wildfire scenarios.

  5. Assessing the Value of Visual Input: A Benchmark of Multimodal Large Language Models for Robotic Path Planning

    cs.RO 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A benchmark of 15 multimodal LLMs on grid path planning reports modest success on 8x8 grids and near-failure on 20x20 grids, but its visual-vs-text comparison is confounded by prompt differences.

  6. Can LLMs plan paths in the real world?

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In all six real-world path-planning scenarios, GPT-4, Gemini, and Mistral produced routes with major errors, leading the authors to judge all three unreliable for navigation.

  7. Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM planning methods, benchmarks, and interpretability work, organized around a three-way taxonomy.

Pith tools