Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scale

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10827 v2 pith:GCZ2TABV submitted 2024-07-15 cs.LG cs.CL

LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scale

classification cs.LG cs.CL
keywords modelsacrossscalecomponentsllmsmechanismsmodelpre-training
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most currently deployed large language models (LLMs) undergo continuous training or additional finetuning. By contrast, most research into LLMs' internal mechanisms focuses on models at one snapshot in time (the end of pre-training), raising the question of whether their results generalize to real-world settings. Existing studies of mechanisms over time focus on encoder-only or toy models, which differ significantly from most deployed models. In this study, we track how model mechanisms, operationalized as circuits, emerge and evolve across 300 billion tokens of training in decoder-only LLMs, in models ranging from 70 million to 2.8 billion parameters. We find that task abilities and the functional components that support them emerge consistently at similar token counts across scale. Moreover, although such components may be implemented by different attention heads over time, the overarching algorithm that they implement remains. Surprisingly, both these algorithms and the types of components involved therein can replicate across model scale. These results suggest that circuit analyses conducted on small models at the end of pre-training can provide insights that still apply after additional pre-training and over model scale.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fingerprint, Not Blueprint: How Positional Schemes Set the Default Spectral Algebra of Attention

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Positional schemes set the default spectral algebra of attention heads: previous-token heads are rotational under RoPE and content-like under absolute/ALiBi, as a post-function fingerprint rather than a hard constraint.