The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2409.04117 · v1 · pith:Y74JXN5G · submitted 2024-09-06 · cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.CL

Confidence-Aware Document OCR Error Detection

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:Y74JXN5Grecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL
keywords confidencescoresdetectionerroraccuracyacrossaddressadjustment
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) continues to face accuracy challenges that impact subsequent applications. To address these errors, we explore the utility of OCR confidence scores for enhancing post-OCR error detection. Our study involves analyzing the correlation between confidence scores and error rates across different OCR systems. We develop ConfBERT, a BERT-based model that incorporates OCR confidence scores into token embeddings and offers an optional pre-training phase for noise adjustment. Our experimental results demonstrate that integrating OCR confidence scores can enhance error detection capabilities. This work underscores the importance of OCR confidence scores in improving detection accuracy and reveals substantial disparities in performance between commercial and open-source OCR technologies.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Logprobs: A Multi-Signal Confidence Engine for LLM-Based Document Field Extraction

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ExtractConf fuses Hunter-Mapper disagreement with LLM uncertainty, OCR, image quality and layout into a classifier that reaches 0.928 ROC AUC on DocILE invoices and 0.858 on CORD receipts, cutting selective prediction...