Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Revisiting Hierarchical Text Classification: Inference and Metrics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01305 v2 pith:Z676SGU4 submitted 2024-10-02 cs.CL cs.LG

Revisiting Hierarchical Text Classification: Inference and Metrics

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords classificationhierarchicalmodelstextbaselinesdatasetevaluateinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Hierarchical text classification (HTC) is the task of assigning labels to a text within a structured space organized as a hierarchy. Recent works treat HTC as a conventional multilabel classification problem, therefore evaluating it as such. We instead propose to evaluate models based on specifically designed hierarchical metrics and we demonstrate the intricacy of metric choice and prediction inference method. We introduce a new challenging dataset and we evaluate fairly, recent sophisticated models, comparing them with a range of simple but strong baselines, including a new theoretically motivated loss. Finally, we show that those baselines are very often competitive with the latest models. This highlights the importance of carefully considering the evaluation methodology when proposing new methods for HTC. Code implementation and dataset are available at \url{https://github.com/RomanPlaud/revisitingHTC}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MedPath: Multi-Domain Cross-Vocabulary Hierarchical Paths for Biomedical Entity Linking

    cs.CL 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    MedPath combines 513k+ expert-annotated biomedical mentions into a UMLS-normalized dataset with cross-vocabulary mappings and hierarchical paths for 11 vocabularies.