REVIEW 1 cited by
Robust, Rapid, and Simple Gravitational-wave Parameter Estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Robust, Rapid, and Simple Gravitational-wave Parameter Estimation
read the original abstract
Rapid and robust parameter estimation of gravitational-wave sources is a key component of modern multi-messenger astronomy. We present a novel and straightforward method for rapid parameter estimation of gravitational-wave sources that uses metric-based importance sampling. The method enables robust parameter estimation of binary neutron star and binary black hole binaries and is trivially parallelized, enabling parameter estimation in seconds with modest resources. The algorithm achieves a median $35\%$ effective sampling efficiency for a population of aligned-spin neutron star binaries sources. Surprisingly, this approach is also highly efficient for analyzing the full 15-dimensional parameter space of typical binary black holes, with a population median $20\%$ efficiency achieved for a source detected primarily by the twin LIGO observatories and $9\%$ for a network of three comparable sensitivity observatories. This method can serve immediate use to improve the low-latency data products of the gravitational-wave observatory network and may be a key component of how the millions of sources observed by next-generation observatories could be analyzed. The approach can also be broadly applied for problems where an approximate likelihood metric-space can be constructed.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Accelerated Sequential Posterior Inference via Reuse for Gravitational-Wave Analyses
ASPIRE reuses old posterior samples via normalizing flows and sequential Monte Carlo to produce unbiased posteriors and evidences under new models, cutting likelihood evaluations 4-10x.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.