Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MACK: Mismodeling Addressed with Contrastive Knowledge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13947 v1 pith:NCDO2JHY submitted 2024-10-17 hep-ph cs.LGhep-ex

MACK: Mismodeling Addressed with Contrastive Knowledge

classification hep-ph cs.LGhep-ex
keywords learningbecomecontrastiveenergyhighknowledgelargemachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of machine learning methods in high energy physics typically relies on large volumes of precise simulation for training. As machine learning models become more complex they can become increasingly sensitive to differences between this simulation and the real data collected by experiments. We present a generic methodology based on contrastive learning which is able to greatly mitigate this negative effect. Crucially, the method does not require prior knowledge of the specifics of the mismodeling. While we demonstrate the efficacy of this technique using the task of jet-tagging at the Large Hadron Collider, it is applicable to a wide array of different tasks both in and out of the field of high energy physics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are We Ready for AI-Driven Discovery? AI Verification Before the Next Fundamental Physics Breakthrough

    physics.data-an 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0

    Verification of ML in fundamental physics is essential precisely when models enter statistical modeling, inference, or hypothesis testing, and is bounded by unavoidable inductive bias, sample complexity, and experimen...