Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

M-RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models in Multilingual Settings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15522 v3 pith:YZS6XWHL submitted 2024-10-20 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords multilingualmodelsperformancelanguagesm-rewardbenchrewardsettingsevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reward models (RMs) have driven the state-of-the-art performance of LLMs today by enabling the integration of human feedback into the language modeling process. However, RMs are primarily trained and evaluated in English, and their capabilities in multilingual settings remain largely understudied. In this work, we conduct a systematic evaluation of several reward models in multilingual settings. We first construct the first-of-its-kind multilingual RM evaluation benchmark, M-RewardBench, consisting of 2.87k preference instances for 23 typologically diverse languages, that tests the chat, safety, reasoning, and translation capabilities of RMs. We then rigorously evaluate a wide range of reward models on M-RewardBench, offering fresh insights into their performance across diverse languages. We identify a significant gap in RMs' performances between English and non-English languages and show that RM preferences can change substantially from one language to another. We also present several findings on how different multilingual aspects impact RM performance. Specifically, we show that the performance of RMs is improved with improved translation quality. Similarly, we demonstrate that the models exhibit better performance for high-resource languages. We release M-RewardBench dataset and the codebase in this study to facilitate a better understanding of RM evaluation in multilingual settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. One Tokenizer To Rule Them All: Emergent Language Plasticity via Multilingual Tokenizers

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tokenizer trained on more languages than the model's main pretraining set makes later language adaptation faster and better, with minimal loss on the pretraining languages.

  2. Activation Reward Models for Few-Shot Model Alignment

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Mean attention-head activations from a few labeled examples, injected into selected heads, turn a frozen vision-language model into a few-shot reward model that beats prompting and scoring baselines and a new reward-h...

  3. Test-Time Scaling with Repeated Sampling Improves Multilingual Text Generation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Repeated sampling with a verifier improves open-ended multilingual generation, and reward-based verifiers are needed for math and code tasks.

Pith tools