Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Hybrid Quantum-Classical Feature Extraction approach for Image Classification using Autoencoders and Quantum SVMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.18814 v1 pith:WZJSN47V submitted 2024-10-24 quant-ph

Hybrid Quantum-Classical Feature Extraction approach for Image Classification using Autoencoders and Quantum SVMs

classification quant-ph
keywords quantummachineimagedatasetlearningautoencoderclassicalclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In order to leverage quantum computers for machine learning tasks such as image classification, careful consideration is required: NISQ-era quantum computers have limitations, which include noise, scalability, read-in and read-out times, and gate operation times. Therefore, strategies should be devised to mitigate the impact that complex datasets can have on the overall efficiency of a quantum machine learning pipeline. This may otherwise lead to excessive resource demands or increased noise. We apply a classical feature extraction method using a ResNet10-inspired convolutional autoencoder to both reduce the dimensionality of the dataset and extract abstract and meaningful features before feeding them into a quantum machine learning block. The quantum block of choice is a quantum-enhanced support vector machine (QSVM), as support vector machines typically do not require large sample sizes to identify patterns in data and have short-depth quantum circuits, which limits the impact of noise. The autoencoder is trained to extract meaningful features through image reconstruction, aiming to minimize the mean squared error across a training set. Three image datasets are used to illustrate the pipeline: HTRU-1, MNIST, and CIFAR-10. We also include a quantum-enhanced one-class support vector machine (QOCSVM) for the highly unbalanced HTRU-1 set, as well as classical machine learning results to serve as a benchmark. Finally, the HTRU-2 dataset is also included to serve as a benchmark for a dataset with well-correlated features. The autoencoder achieved near-perfect reconstruction and high classification accuracy for MNIST, while CIFAR-10 showed poorer performance due to image complexity, and HTRU-1 struggled because of dataset imbalance. This highlights the need for a balance between dimensionality reduction through classical feature extraction and prediction performance using quantum methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Machine learning development for quantum computing and neutrino physics

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    QELM classifiers plateau at accuracy matching random quantum circuits via local, classically simulable entanglement, while a timing-aware ResNet-18 distinguishes single-vertex from pile-up Hyper-K IWCD events at near-...

  2. Quantum kernel and HHL-based support vector machines for multi-class classification

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    On a reduced SDSS dataset, quantum-kernel QSVM outperforms HHL LS-SVM, classical SVMs are slightly ahead, and the HHL method's constant scaling stems from using only two class-average representatives.