REVIEW 3 cited by
A Multi-Agent Approach for REST API Testing with Semantic Graphs and LLM-Driven Inputs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Multi-Agent Approach for REST API Testing with Semantic Graphs and LLM-Driven Inputs
read the original abstract
As modern web services increasingly rely on REST APIs, their thorough testing has become crucial. Furthermore, the advent of REST API documentation languages, such as the OpenAPI Specification, has led to the emergence of many black-box REST API testing tools. However, these tools often focus on individual test elements in isolation (e.g., APIs, parameters, values), resulting in lower coverage and less effectiveness in fault detection. To address these limitations, we present AutoRestTest, the first black-box tool to adopt a dependency-embedded multi-agent approach for REST API testing that integrates multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) with a semantic property dependency graph (SPDG) and Large Language Models (LLMs). Our approach treats REST API testing as a separable problem, where four agents -- API, dependency, parameter, and value agents -- collaborate to optimize API exploration. LLMs handle domain-specific value generation, the SPDG model simplifies the search space for dependencies using a similarity score between API operations, and MARL dynamically optimizes the agents' behavior. Our evaluation of AutoRestTest on 12 real-world REST services shows that it outperforms the four leading black-box REST API testing tools, including those assisted by RESTGPT (which generates realistic test inputs using LLMs), in terms of code coverage, operation coverage, and fault detection. Notably, AutoRestTest is the only tool able to trigger an internal server error in the Spotify service. Our ablation study illustrates that each component of AutoRestTest -- the SPDG, the LLM, and the agent-learning mechanism -- contributes to its overall effectiveness.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
MASTOR: A Multi-Agent Approach to Semantic Test Oracle Generation for RESTful APIs
MASTOR is a multi-agent system that generates semantic test oracles from REST API source code via source extraction and dual oracle-generation paths with challenger review, achieving 75.4% average mutation score on 13...
-
From REST to MCP: An Empirical Study of API Wrapping and Automated Server Generation for LLM Agents
First large-scale empirical analysis of MCP server construction shows predominant REST wrapping with low operation exposure, plus an AutoMCP pipeline that improves automated generation success and reduces tool complexity.
-
AutoRestTest at the SBFT 2026 Tool Competition
AutoRestTest ranked first in fault detection, efficiency, and effectiveness in the SBFT 2026 REST League on 11 APIs with 317 operations under a one-hour budget.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.