Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Uncertainty Herding: One Active Learning Method for All Label Budgets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.20644 v2 pith:OJKDHT3L submitted 2024-12-30 cs.LG stat.ML

Uncertainty Herding: One Active Learning Method for All Label Budgets

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords budgetsactivehigh-budgetlabellearninglow-methodmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most active learning research has focused on methods which perform well when many labels are available, but can be dramatically worse than random selection when label budgets are small. Other methods have focused on the low-budget regime, but do poorly as label budgets increase. As the line between "low" and "high" budgets varies by problem, this is a serious issue in practice. We propose uncertainty coverage, an objective which generalizes a variety of low- and high-budget objectives, as well as natural, hyperparameter-light methods to smoothly interpolate between low- and high-budget regimes. We call greedy optimization of the estimate Uncertainty Herding; this simple method is computationally fast, and we prove that it nearly optimizes the distribution-level coverage. In experimental validation across a variety of active learning tasks, our proposal matches or beats state-of-the-art performance in essentially all cases; it is the only method of which we are aware that reliably works well in both low- and high-budget settings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Combining Discrepancy-Confusion Uncertainty and Calibration Diversity for Active Fine-Grained Image Classification

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    DECERN selects annotation samples by combining a fusion-based uncertainty score with a diversity calibration that balances closeness to uncertainty-weighted cluster centers and distance from known class anchors.