Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LEO-Split: A Semi-Supervised Split Learning Framework over LEO Satellite Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.01293 v1 pith:M7D4TGS7 submitted 2025-01-02 cs.LG cs.AIcs.DCcs.NI

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.DCcs.NI
keywords learningdatasatelliteleo-splitsatellitestrainingchallengesconnectivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, the increasing deployment of LEO satellite systems has enabled various space analytics (e.g., crop and climate monitoring), which heavily relies on the advancements in deep learning (DL). However, the intermittent connectivity between LEO satellites and ground station (GS) significantly hinders the timely transmission of raw data to GS for centralized learning, while the scaled-up DL models hamper distributed learning on resource-constrained LEO satellites. Though split learning (SL) can be a potential solution to these problems by partitioning a model and offloading primary training workload to GS, the labor-intensive labeling process remains an obstacle, with intermittent connectivity and data heterogeneity being other challenges. In this paper, we propose LEO-Split, a semi-supervised (SS) SL design tailored for satellite networks to combat these challenges. Leveraging SS learning to handle (labeled) data scarcity, we construct an auxiliary model to tackle the training failure of the satellite-GS non-contact time. Moreover, we propose a pseudo-labeling algorithm to rectify data imbalances across satellites. Lastly, an adaptive activation interpolation scheme is devised to prevent the overfitting of server-side sub-model training at GS. Extensive experiments with real-world LEO satellite traces (e.g., Starlink) demonstrate that our LEO-Split framework achieves superior performance compared to state-ofthe-art benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Satellite-Ground Synergistic Large Vision-Language Model System for Earth Observation

    cs.NI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SpaceVerse jointly decides where to run vision-language inference in LEO satellite networks and compresses task-irrelevant image regions before downlink, improving accuracy and cutting latency versus baselines.

  2. PHandover: Parallel Handover in Mobile Satellite Network

    cs.NI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A parallel, plan-based handover using a new Satellite Synchronized Function cuts LEO satellite handover latency to about 9 ms on average in an emulated prototype.

Pith tools