Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Year-over-Year Developments in Financial Fraud Detection via Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.00201 v2 pith:UYWAHGST submitted 2025-01-31 cs.LG cs.AIq-fin.ST

Year-over-Year Developments in Financial Fraud Detection via Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review

classification cs.LG cs.AIq-fin.ST
keywords financialreviewdeepdetectionfraudlearningadvancementscritical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper systematically reviews advancements in deep learning (DL) techniques for financial fraud detection, a critical issue in the financial sector. Using the Kitchenham systematic literature review approach, 57 studies published between 2019 and 2024 were analyzed. The review highlights the effectiveness of various deep learning models such as Convolutional Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory, and transformers across domains such as credit card transactions, insurance claims, and financial statement audits. Performance metrics such as precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC were evaluated. Key themes explored include the impact of data privacy frameworks and advancements in feature engineering and data preprocessing. The study emphasizes challenges such as imbalanced datasets, model interpretability, and ethical considerations, alongside opportunities for automation and privacy-preserving techniques such as blockchain integration and Principal Component Analysis. By examining trends over the past five years, this review identifies critical gaps and promising directions for advancing DL applications in financial fraud detection, offering actionable insights for researchers and practitioners.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Operational Evidence Gaps for LLMs in Fraud Detection and Trust-and-Safety Workflows

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A survey of 49 LLM fraud and trust-and-safety papers finds that fraud work reports almost no per-decision latency, cost, or calibration evidence, while moderation work reports more.

  2. Prediction of bank transaction fraud using TabNet an adaptive deep learning architecture

    q-fin.GN 2026-07 reject novelty 3.0

    TabNet is reported to beat DNN, LSTM, GRU and CNN1D on a Kaggle bank-fraud dataset, but the evaluation leaks synthetic SMOTE data across folds and reports in-sample metrics.