REVIEW 2 cited by
Iterative Deepening Sampling as Efficient Test-Time Scaling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent reasoning models, such as OpenAI's O1 series, have demonstrated exceptional performance on complex reasoning tasks and revealed new test-time scaling laws. Inspired by this, many people have been studying how to train models to achieve effective self-evaluation and self-correction to further enable the scaling paradigm. However, less studied is how to efficiently scale test-time compute from a fixed model, and this remains a challenge. In this paper, we address this challenge by focusing on enhancing the quality of self-reflection data generation for complex problem-solving at test time, which can also subsequently improve the training of next-generation large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we explore how systematically triggering a model's self-correction mechanisms can improve performance on challenging reasoning tasks. To this end, we propose a novel iterative deepening sampling algorithm framework designed to enhance self-correction and generate higher-quality samples. Through extensive experiments on Math500 and AIME benchmarks, we demonstrate that our method achieves a higher success rate on difficult tasks and provide detailed ablation studies to analyze its effectiveness across diverse settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Corrector Sampling in Language Models
A training and sampling method that lets autoregressive LLMs resample earlier tokens in a small window, improving reasoning and coding benchmark scores by about 10% relative after a 100B-token fine-tuning.
-
Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs
The survey's L1/L2 taxonomy and benchmark show that current reasoning models waste compute on easy problems and underthink hard ones, motivating more adaptive inference.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.