pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.06088 · v2 · submitted 2025-02-10 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Family Unification in SO(16) Grand Unification

Cheng-Wei Chiang , Tianjun Li , Naoki Yamatsu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 04:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords SO(16) grand unificationfamily unificationsix-dimensional spacetimeanomaly cancellationorbifold compactificationgauge coupling runningchiral generationsspinor representation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Three chiral generations of quarks and leptons unify into one 6D Weyl fermion in the SO(16) spinor representation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a 6D SO(16) grand unified theory that also incorporates an SU(3) family symmetry. A single 6D Weyl fermion in the spinor representation contains all three observed generations of quarks and leptons. The 6D gauge anomaly cancels because the overall 6D content is vectorlike, while 4D anomalies are removed by adding fermions localized at the orbifold fixed point. The SO(16) gauge coupling runs weaker toward higher energies.

Core claim

We propose a unified model for the three Standard Model gauge symmetries and SU(3) family symmetry based on SO(16) grand unified gauge symmetry on six-dimensional spacetime. In this model, three chiral generations of quarks and leptons are unified into a 6D Weyl fermion in the spinor representation of SO(16). The 6D SO(16) gauge anomaly is canceled by the vectorlike nature of the model, and the 4D gauge anomalies are canceled by introducing suitable 4D localized fermions at the fixed point. The 4D gauge coupling constant of SO(16) has the property of becoming weaker at high energies.

What carries the argument

6D Weyl fermion in the spinor representation of SO(16), compactified on an orbifold with 4D localized fermions at fixed points

Load-bearing premise

A consistent 6D SO(16) theory exists on the orbifold whose compactification plus localized fields produces exactly the observed 4D chiral spectrum and gauge group without new inconsistencies.

What would settle it

An explicit zero-mode calculation from the 6D spinor on the chosen orbifold that yields the wrong number of chiral generations or leaves uncanceled 4D anomalies.

read the original abstract

We propose a unified model for the three Standard Model (SM) gauge symmetries and $SU(3)$ family symmetry based on $SO(16)$ grand unified gauge symmetry on six-dimensional (6D) spacetime. In this model, three chiral generations of quarks and leptons are unified into a 6D Weyl fermion in the spinor representation of $SO(16)$. The 6D $SO(16)$ gauge anomaly is canceled by the vectorlike nature of the model, and the 4D gauge anomalies are canceled by introducing suitable 4D localized fermions at the fixed point. The 4D gauge coupling constant of $SO(16)$ has the property of becoming weaker at high energies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a 6D SO(16) grand unified model in which an SU(3) family symmetry is incorporated alongside the SM gauge group. Three chiral SM generations are claimed to arise from a single 6D Weyl fermion in the spinor representation of SO(16). The 6D gauge anomaly is asserted to cancel due to the vectorlike structure of the model, 4D anomalies are canceled by adding localized fermions at orbifold fixed points, and the SO(16) gauge coupling is stated to become weaker at high energies.

Significance. If an explicit, consistent construction were supplied that yields precisely the observed 4D chiral spectrum without extraneous light states or fine-tuning, the approach would constitute a distinctive higher-dimensional mechanism for family unification. The use of a single higher-dimensional spinor to generate multiple generations is a conceptually economical idea that, if realized, would merit attention in extra-dimensional GUT model building.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that three chiral generations emerge from one 6D Weyl spinor in the 128 of SO(16) requires an explicit orbifold (e.g., T²/Zₙ), parity assignments on the spinor, and branching rules under SO(16) ⊃ SM × SU(3)_family together with a zero-mode chirality calculation; none of these are supplied, rendering the unification statement unverifiable and load-bearing for the entire proposal.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the 6D SO(16) gauge anomaly cancels because of the vectorlike nature of the model, and that 4D anomalies are canceled by localized fermions, is stated without any computation of the 6D anomaly coefficient for the spinor representation or the 4D anomaly coefficients of the added localized fields; these cancellations are essential to the consistency of the construction.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the 4D SO(16) gauge coupling becomes weaker at high energies, but supplies no beta-function calculation or reference to the contribution of the localized fermions and bulk modes; a brief derivation or citation would clarify this point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We agree that the manuscript requires additional explicit details to make the construction verifiable and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that three chiral generations emerge from one 6D Weyl spinor in the 128 of SO(16) requires an explicit orbifold (e.g., T²/Zₙ), parity assignments on the spinor, branching rules under SO(16) ⊃ SM × SU(3)_family together with a zero-mode chirality calculation; none of these are supplied, rendering the unification statement unverifiable and load-bearing for the entire proposal.

    Authors: We agree that these explicit elements are needed for verification. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated section specifying the orbifold (T²/Z_n), the parity assignments on the 128 spinor, the branching rules under SO(16) ⊃ SM × SU(3)_family, and the zero-mode chirality calculation that yields precisely three chiral generations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the 6D SO(16) gauge anomaly cancels because of the vectorlike nature of the model, and that 4D anomalies are canceled by localized fermions, is stated without any computation of the 6D anomaly coefficient for the spinor representation or the 4D anomaly coefficients of the added localized fields; these cancellations are essential to the consistency of the construction.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the anomaly cancellations must be supported by explicit coefficients. The revision will include the 6D anomaly coefficient computation for the spinor representation (demonstrating cancellation via the vectorlike structure) and the 4D anomaly coefficients for the localized fixed-point fermions together with their cancellation of residual anomalies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: constructive model proposal without load-bearing derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper proposes a 6D SO(16) GUT with family unification via a single Weyl spinor, anomaly cancellation by vectorlike pairing plus localized fermions, and asymptotic freedom of the gauge coupling. No equations, branching rules, zero-mode calculations, or anomaly coefficients are presented that could reduce to fitted inputs or prior self-citations by construction. The central claims are statements of model construction rather than predictions derived from parameters that loop back to the same data. This is a standard non-circular model-building paper; the absence of explicit spectrum computation is a completeness issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

Only the abstract is supplied, so the ledger is inferred from the high-level statements: the construction relies on standard higher-dimensional anomaly cancellation and orbifold compactification assumptions while postulating a single 6D spinor and localized 4D states.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of 6D gauge theories on orbifolds allow consistent chiral 4D spectra after compactification
    Invoked to justify that the 6D vectorlike model plus localized fermions yields the desired 4D chiral generations.
  • domain assumption Anomaly cancellation conditions in 6D and 4D can be satisfied simultaneously by the stated mechanisms
    Central to the consistency claim in the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • 6D Weyl fermion in the spinor representation of SO(16) no independent evidence
    purpose: Unify three chiral generations together with SU(3) family symmetry
    Postulated as the single object containing all three families; no independent evidence provided.
  • 4D localized fermions at fixed points no independent evidence
    purpose: Cancel 4D gauge anomalies
    Introduced specifically to fix anomalies after compactification; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5646 in / 1623 out tokens · 39864 ms · 2026-05-23T04:26:27.302674+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Family Unification in a Six Dimensional Theory with an Orthogonal Gauge Group

    hep-ph 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A 6D SO(20) gauge theory with one spinorial fermion unifies three SM generations and the Higgs after compactification to 5D.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 48 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Horizontal Interaction and Weak Mixing Angles,

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Horizontal Interaction and Weak Mixing Angles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 421

    work page 1979

  2. [2]

    Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, “Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,” Nucl. Phys. B147 (1979) 277

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    Horizontal Gauge Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,

    T. Yanagida, “Horizontal Gauge Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,”. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Baryon Number of the Universe and Unified Theories, Tsukuba, Japan, p95 (1979)

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    Gauge Symmetry of Horizontal Flavor,

    T. Maehara and T. Yanagida, “Gauge Symmetry of Horizontal Flavor,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 61 (1979) 1434

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    Generations of Quarks and Leptons from Noncompact Horizontal Symmetry

    K. Inoue, “Generations of Quarks and Leptons from Noncompact Horizontal Symmetry,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 93 (1995) 403–416, arXiv:hep-ph/9410220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  6. [6]

    Fermion Masses and Mixing Angles from SU(3) Family Symmetry

    S. F. King and G. G. Ross, “Fermion Masses and Mixing Angles from SU (3) Family Symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B520 (2001) 243–253, arXiv:hep-ph/0108112. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Horizontal symmetry in Higgs sector of GUT with U(1)_A symmetry

    N. Maekawa and T. Yamashita, “Horizontal Symmetry in Higgs Sector of GUT with U(1)A Symmetry,” JHEP 07 (2004) 009, arXiv:hep-ph/0404020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    Charged lepton and down-type quark masses in SU(1,1) model and the structure of higgs sector

    K. Inoue and N. Yamatsu, “Charged Lepton and Down-Type Quark Masses in SU (1, 1) Model and the Structure of Higgs Sector,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 119 (2008) 775–796, arXiv:0712.2938 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    New Mixing Structures of Chiral Generations in a Model with Noncompact Horizontal Symmetry

    N. Yamatsu, “New Mixing Structures of Chiral Generations in a Model with Noncompact Horizontal Symmetry,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013 (2013) 023B03, arXiv:1209.6318 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    On fermion mass hierarchy with extra dimensions

    K. Yoshioka, “On Fermion Mass Hierarchy with Extra Dimensions,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A15 (2000) 29–40, arXiv:hep-ph/9904433 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    Quark mass hierarchy and mixing via geometry of extra dimension with point interactions

    Y. Fujimoto, T. Nagasawa, K. Nishiwaki, and M. Sakamoto, “Quark Mass Hierarchy and Mixing via Geometry of Extra Dimension with Point Interactions,” PTEP 2013 (2013) 023B07, arXiv:1209.5150 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces,

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, “Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438–441

    work page 1974

  13. [13]

    Unification of the Lepton-Quark World by the Gauge Group SU(6),

    K. Inoue, A. Kakuto, and Y. Nakano, “Unification of the Lepton-Quark World by the Gauge Group SU(6),” Prog.Theor.Phys. 58 (1977) 630

    work page 1977

  14. [14]

    Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons,

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, “Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons,” Ann. Phys. 93 (1975) 193–266

    work page 1975

  15. [15]

    Inclusion of Generations in SO(14),

    M. Ida, Y. Kayama, and T. Kitazoe, “Inclusion of Generations in SO(14),” Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980) 1745

    work page 1980

  16. [16]

    SO(18) Unification,

    Y. Fujimoto, “SO(18) Unification,” Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 3183

    work page 1982

  17. [17]

    A Universal Gauge Theory Model Based on E6,

    F. Gursey, P. Ramond, and P. Sikivie, “A Universal Gauge Theory Model Based on E6,” Phys. Lett. B60 (1976) 177

    work page 1976

  18. [18]

    Gauge Symmetry Reduction from the Extra Space $S^1/Z_2$

    Y. Kawamura, “Gauge Symmetry Breaking from Extra Space S1/Z2,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 103 (2000) 613–619, arXiv:hep-ph/9902423 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Split Multiplets, Coupling Unification and Extra Dimension

    Y. Kawamura, “Split Multiplets, Coupling Unification and Extra Dimension,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 105 (2001) 691–696, arXiv:hep-ph/0012352

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Triplet-doublet Splitting, Proton Stability and Extra Dimension

    Y. Kawamura, “Triplet-Doublet Splitting, Proton Stability and Extra Dimension,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 105 (2001) 999–1006, arXiv:hep-ph/0012125

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  21. [21]

    Gauge Unification in Higher Dimensions

    L. J. Hall and Y. Nomura, “Gauge Unification in Higher Dimensions,” Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) 055003, arXiv:hep-ph/0103125 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    Unification of Higgs and Gauge Fields in Five Dimensions

    G. Burdman and Y. Nomura, “Unification of Higgs and Gauge Fields in Five-Dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B656 (2003) 3–22, arXiv:hep-ph/0210257 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  23. [23]

    Towards A Realistic Grand Gauge-Higgs Unification

    C. S. Lim and N. Maru, “Towards a Realistic Grand Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys.Lett. B653 (2007) 320–324, arXiv:0706.1397 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Unification in 5D SO(10)

    H. D. Kim and S. Raby, “Unification in 5-D SO(10),” JHEP 01 (2003) 056, arXiv:hep-ph/0212348 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  25. [25]

    A simple SO(10) GUT in five dimensions

    T. Fukuyama and N. Okada, “A Simple SO(10) GUT in Five Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 015005, arXiv:0803.1758 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification

    Y. Hosotani and N. Yamatsu, “Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015 (2015) 111B01, arXiv:1504.03817 [hep-ph] . 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    The Family Group in Grand Unified Theories

    P. Ramond, “The Family Group in Grand Unified Theories,” in International Symposium on Fundamentals of Quantum Theory and Quantum Field Theory, pp. 265–280. 1979. arXiv:hep-ph/9809459 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  28. [28]

    Higher dimensional supersymmetry in 4D superspace

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Gregoire, and J. G. Wacker, “Higher Dimensional Supersymmetry in 4-D Superspace,” JHEP 03 (2002) 055, arXiv:hep-th/0101233

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    Orbifold Family Unification

    Y. Kawamura, T. Kinami, and K.-y. Oda, “Orbifold Family Unification,” Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 035001, arXiv:hep-ph/0703195

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  30. [30]

    Orbifold Family Unification in SO(2N) Gauge Theory

    Y. Kawamura and T. Miura, “Orbifold Family Unification in SO(2N) Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 075011, arXiv:0912.0776 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  31. [31]

    Orbifold Family Unification on 6 Dimensions

    Y. Goto, Y. Kawamura, and T. Miura, “Orbifold Family Unification on Six Dimensions,” Phys.Rev. D88 no. 5, (2013) 055016, arXiv:1307.2631

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    On the chirality of the SM and the fermion content of GUTs

    R. M. Fonseca, “On the Chirality of the SM and the Fermion Content of GUTs,” Nucl. Phys. B897 (2015) 757–780, arXiv:1504.03695 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    Unification of gauge, family, and flavor symmetries illustrated in gauged SU(12) models

    C. H. Albright, R. P. Feger, and T. W. Kephart, “Unification of Gauge, Family, and Flavor Symmetries Illustrated in Gauged SU (12) Models,” Phys. Rev. D93 no. 7, (2016) 075032, arXiv:1601.07523 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Orbifold family unification using vectorlike representation on six dimensions

    Y. Goto and Y. Kawamura, “Orbifold Family Unification Using Vectorlike Representation on Six Dimensions,” arXiv:1712.06444 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    A Model of Comprehensive Unification

    M. Reig, J. W. F. Valle, C. A. Vaquera-Araujo, and F. Wilczek, “A Model of Comprehensive Unification,” Phys. Lett. B774 (2017) 667–670, arXiv:1706.03116 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Family Unification in Special Grand Unification,

    N. Yamatsu, “Family Unification in Special Grand Unification,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018 no. 9, (2018) 091B01, arXiv:1807.10855 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Flavorgenesis in an SU(19) model,

    A. Ekstedt, R. M. Fonseca, and M. Malinsk´ y, “Flavorgenesis in an SU(19) model,” Phys. Lett. B 816 (2021) 136212, arXiv:2009.03909 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Attempt at Constructing a Model of Grand Gauge-Higgs Unification with Family Unification,

    N. Maru and R. Nago, “Attempt at Constructing a Model of Grand Gauge-Higgs Unification with Family Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 11, (2024) 115005, arXiv:2403.02731 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Finite-Dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Represe ntations for Unified Model Building,

    N. Yamatsu, “Finite-Dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Representations for Unified Model Building,” arXiv:1511.08771 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Special Grand Unification,

    N. Yamatsu, “Special Grand Unification,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017 no. 6, (2017) 061B01, arXiv:1704.08827 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    String-Inspired Special Grand Unification,

    N. Yamatsu, “String-Inspired Special Grand Unification,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017 no. 10, (2017) 101B01, arXiv:1708.02078 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Discrete Symmetry and GUT Breaking

    T.-j. Li, “Discrete Symmetry and GUT Breaking,” Eur. Phys. J. C 24 (2002) 595–612, arXiv:hep-th/0110065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  43. [43]

    Supersymmetric SO(10) Models Inspired by Deconstruction

    C.-S. Huang, J. Jiang, and T. Li, “Supersymmetric SO(10) Models Inspired by Deconstruction,” Nucl. Phys. B 702 (2004) 109–130, arXiv:hep-ph/0407180

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  44. [44]

    Comment on Gauge Theories Without Anomalies,

    J. Banks and H. Georgi, “Comment on Gauge Theories Without Anomalies,” Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 1159–1160

    work page 1976

  45. [45]

    Gauge Groups Without Triangular Anomaly,

    S. Okubo, “Gauge Groups Without Triangular Anomaly,” Phys.Rev. D16 (1977) 3528

    work page 1977

  46. [46]

    On the Triangle Anomaly Number of SU (n) Representaions,

    J. Patera and R. T. Sharp, “On the Triangle Anomaly Number of SU (n) Representaions,” J. Math. Phys. 22 (1981) 2352. 12

    work page 1981

  47. [47]

    Lepton Number as the Fourth Color,

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Lepton Number as the Fourth Color,” Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 275–289

    work page 1974

  48. [48]

    On Fermion number and its conservation,

    J. Pati, A. Salam, and J. Strathdee, “On Fermion number and its conservation,” Nuovo Cim. A 26 (1975) 72–83

    work page 1975

  49. [49]

    Natural Suppression of Strong P and T Noninvariance,

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, “Natural Suppression of Strong P and T Noninvariance,” Phys. Lett. B79 (1978) 283–286

    work page 1978

  50. [50]

    Group Theory for Unified Model Building,

    R. Slansky, “Group Theory for Unified Model Building,” Phys. Rept. 79 (1981) 1–128

    work page 1981

  51. [51]

    Gauge Coupling Unification in Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification

    N. Yamatsu, “Gauge Coupling Unification in Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016 (2016) 043B02, arXiv:1512.05559 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Consistency Checks of Grand Unified Theories,

    U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, P. H. Frampton, H. Furstenau, and J. T. Liu, “Consistency Checks of Grand Unified Theories,” Phys. Lett. B 281 (1992) 374–382

    work page 1992

  53. [53]

    Implications of LEP Results for SO(10) Grand Unification,

    N. Deshpande, E. Keith, and P. B. Pal, “Implications of LEP Results for SO(10) Grand Unification,” Phys.Rev. D46 (1992) 2261–2264

    work page 1992

  54. [54]

    Implications of LEP Results for SO(10) Grandunification with Two Intermediate Stages

    N. Deshpande, E. Keith, and P. B. Pal, “Implications of LEP Results for SO(10) Grand Unification with Two Intermediate Stages,” Phys.Rev. D47 (1993) 2892–2896, arXiv:hep-ph/9211232 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  55. [55]

    Natural Non-SUSY SU(N) GUTs,

    J. L. Chkareuli, I. G. Gogoladze, and A. B. Kobakhidze, “Natural Non-SUSY SU(N) GUTs,” Phys. Lett. B 340 (1994) 63–66

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    A Minimal Non-Supersymmetric $SO(10)$ Model: Gauge Coupling Unification, Proton Decay and Fermion masses

    K. S. Babu and S. Khan, “Minimal Nonsupersymmetric SO(10) Model: Gauge Coupling Unification, Proton Decay, and Fermion Masses,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 7, (2015) 075018, arXiv:1507.06712 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    SO(10) paths to dark matter

    S. Ferrari, T. Hambye, J. Heeck, and M. H. Tytgat, “ SO(10) Paths to Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 5, (2019) 055032, arXiv:1811.07910 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter Model Inspired by Grand Unification,

    Y. Abe, T. Toma, K. Tsumura, and N. Yamatsu, “Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter Model Inspired by Grand Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035011, arXiv:2104.13523 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter in SU(7) Grand Unification,

    C.-W. Chiang, K. Tsumura, Y. Uchida, and N. Yamatsu, “Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter in SU(7) Grand Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 5, (2024) 055040, arXiv:2311.13753 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Dynamical Mass Generation by Compact Extra Dimensions,

    Y. Hosotani, “Dynamical Mass Generation by Compact Extra Dimensions,” Phys.Lett. B126 (1983) 309

    work page 1983

  61. [61]

    Dynamics of Nonintegrable Phases and Gauge Symmetry Breaking,

    Y. Hosotani, “Dynamics of Nonintegrable Phases and Gauge Symmetry Breaking,” Annals Phys. 190 (1989) 233

    work page 1989

  62. [62]

    Gauge Group Breaking By Wilson Loops,

    A. T. Davies and A. McLachlan, “Gauge Group Breaking By Wilson Loops,” Phys. Lett. B200 (1988) 305

    work page 1988

  63. [63]

    Congruency Class Effects in the Hosotani Model,

    A. T. Davies and A. McLachlan, “Congruency Class Effects in the Hosotani Model,” Nucl. Phys. B317 (1989) 237

    work page 1989

  64. [64]

    The Gauge Hierarchy Problem and Higher Dimensional Gauge Theories

    H. Hatanaka, T. Inami, and C. S. Lim, “The Gauge Hierarchy Problem and Higher Dimensional Gauge Theories,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A13 (1998) 2601–2612, arXiv:hep-th/9805067

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  65. [65]

    The Minimal Composite Higgs Model

    K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, “The Minimal Composite Higgs Model,” Nucl. Phys. B719 (2005) 165–187, arXiv:hep-ph/0412089 [hep-ph] . 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in SO(5)xU(1) Gauge-Higgs Unification with Top and Bottom Quarks

    Y. Hosotani, K. Oda, T. Ohnuma, and Y. Sakamura, “Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in SO(5) × U(1) Gauge-Higgs Unification with Top and Bottom Quarks,” Phys.Rev. D78 (2008) 096002, arXiv:0806.0480 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [67]

    GUT inspired $SO(5) \times U(1) \times SU(3)$ gauge-Higgs unification

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “GUT Inspired SO(5) × U(1) × SU (3) Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 095010, arXiv:1902.01603 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Toward Realistic Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification

    A. Furui, Y. Hosotani, and N. Yamatsu, “Toward Realistic Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016 (2016) 093B01, arXiv:1606.07222 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  69. [69]

    Gauge-Higgs Seesaw Mechanism in 6-Dimensional Grand Unification,

    Y. Hosotani and N. Yamatsu, “Gauge-Higgs Seesaw Mechanism in 6-Dimensional Grand Unification,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017 no. 9, (2017) 091B01, arXiv:1706.03503 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and Mass Spectra in Six-Dimensional Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification

    Y. Hosotani and N. Yamatsu, “Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and Mass Spectra in Six-Dimensional Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification,” Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018 no. 2, (2018) 023B05, arXiv:1710.04811 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Phenomenology of GUT-Inspired Gauge-Higgs Unification,

    C. Englert, D. J. Miller, and D. D. Smaranda, “Phenomenology of GUT-Inspired Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Lett. B 802 (2020) 135261, arXiv:1911.05527 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    The Weinberg Angle and 5D RGE Effects in a SO(11) GUT Theory,

    C. Englert, D. J. Miller, and D. D. Smaranda, “The Weinberg Angle and 5D RGE Effects in a SO(11) GUT Theory,” Phys. Lett. B 807 (2020) 135548, arXiv:2003.05743 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Novel universality and Higgs decay H -> \gamma \gamma, gg in the SO(5) x U(1) gauge-Higgs unification

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and T. Shimotani, “Novel Universality and Higgs Decay H → γγ, gg in the SO(5) ×U(1) Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Lett. B722 (2013) 94–99, arXiv:1301.1744 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    CKM Matrix and FCNC Suppression in SO(5) × U(1) × SU (3) Gauge-Higgs Unification,

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “CKM Matrix and FCNC Suppression in SO(5) × U(1) × SU (3) Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 055016, arXiv:1909.00190 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Effective Potential and Universality in GUT-Inspired Gauge-Higgs Unification,

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Effective Potential and Universality in GUT-Inspired Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015005, arXiv:2002.09262 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Fermion Pair Production at e−e+ Linear Collider Experiments in GUT Inspired Gauge-Higgs Unification,

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Fermion Pair Production at e−e+ Linear Collider Experiments in GUT Inspired Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015029, arXiv:2006.02157 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Electroweak and Left-Right Phase Transitions in SO(5) × U(1) × SU (3) Gauge-Higgs Unification,

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Electroweak and Left-Right Phase Transitions in SO(5) × U(1) × SU (3) Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (4, 2021) 115018, arXiv:2104.02870 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Signals of W ′ and Z′ Bosons at the LHC in the SU (3) × SO(5) × U(1) Gauge-Higgs Unification,

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Signals of W ′ and Z′ Bosons at the LHC in the SU (3) × SO(5) × U(1) Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 055015, arXiv:2111.05624 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Bhabha Scattering in the Gauge-Higgs Unification,

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Bhabha Scattering in the Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (3, 2022) 015015, arXiv:2203.16030 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Single Higgs Boson Production at Electron-Positron Colliders in Gauge-Higgs Unification,

    S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Single Higgs Boson Production at Electron-Positron Colliders in Gauge-Higgs Unification,” Phys. Rev. D 107 (1, 2023) 075030, arXiv:2301.07833 [hep-ph] . 14

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.