Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Diffusion Models Through a Global Lens: Are They Culturally Inclusive?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.08914 v2 pith:WSGY25VY submitted 2025-02-13 cs.CV cs.AI

Diffusion Models Through a Global Lens: Are They Culturally Inclusive?

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords culturalimagesmodelsdiffusionartifactsculturallygeneratehuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-to-image diffusion models have recently enabled the creation of visually compelling, detailed images from textual prompts. However, their ability to accurately represent various cultural nuances remains an open question. In our work, we introduce CultDiff benchmark, evaluating state-of-the-art diffusion models whether they can generate culturally specific images spanning ten countries. We show that these models often fail to generate cultural artifacts in architecture, clothing, and food, especially for underrepresented country regions, by conducting a fine-grained analysis of different similarity aspects, revealing significant disparities in cultural relevance, description fidelity, and realism compared to real-world reference images. With the collected human evaluations, we develop a neural-based image-image similarity metric, namely, CultDiff-S, to predict human judgment on real and generated images with cultural artifacts. Our work highlights the need for more inclusive generative AI systems and equitable dataset representation over a wide range of cultures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exposing Blindspots: Cultural Bias Evaluation in Generative Image Models

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    When countries are not named, image models default to US-like modern styles, and iterative image editing erodes cultural fidelity that CLIPScore misses but human raters and a culture-aware VQA metric catch.