REVIEW 2 cited by
Drift: Decoding-time Personalized Alignments with Implicit User Preferences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Drift: Decoding-time Personalized Alignments with Implicit User Preferences
read the original abstract
Personalized alignments for individual users have been a long-standing goal in large language models (LLMs). We introduce Drift, a novel framework that personalizes LLMs at decoding time with implicit user preferences. Traditional Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) requires thousands of annotated examples and expensive gradient updates. In contrast, Drift personalizes LLMs in a training-free manner, using only a few dozen examples to steer a frozen model through efficient preference modeling. Our approach models user preferences as a composition of predefined, interpretable attributes and aligns them at decoding time to enable personalized generation. Experiments on both a synthetic persona dataset (Perspective) and a real human-annotated dataset (PRISM) demonstrate that Drift significantly outperforms RLHF baselines while using only 50-100 examples. Our results and analysis show that Drift is both computationally efficient and interpretable.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
REAR: Test-time Preference Realignment through Reward Decomposition
REAR decomposes the reward into question and preference components, rescales their balance, and expresses the result as a linear combination of token log-probabilities for efficient integration with best-of-N and tree search.
-
PrefReward: Learning User Preference Matrix for Personalized Text Generation
PrefReward selects the most style-aligned LLM output via a KL-divergence reward against an explicit user preference matrix, beating retrieval baselines on LongLaMP.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.