Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Impact and Feasibility of Self-Confidence Shaping for AI-Assisted Decision-Making

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.14311 v1 pith:OM6L3Q7K submitted 2025-02-20 cs.HC cs.CLcs.CY

The Impact and Feasibility of Self-Confidence Shaping for AI-Assisted Decision-Making

classification cs.HC cs.CLcs.CY
keywords self-confidenceshapinghuman-aiai-assisteddecision-makingfeasibilityimpactintervention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In AI-assisted decision-making, it is crucial but challenging for humans to appropriately rely on AI, especially in high-stakes domains such as finance and healthcare. This paper addresses this problem from a human-centered perspective by presenting an intervention for self-confidence shaping, designed to calibrate self-confidence at a targeted level. We first demonstrate the impact of self-confidence shaping by quantifying the upper-bound improvement in human-AI team performance. Our behavioral experiments with 121 participants show that self-confidence shaping can improve human-AI team performance by nearly 50% by mitigating both over- and under-reliance on AI. We then introduce a self-confidence prediction task to identify when our intervention is needed. Our results show that simple machine-learning models achieve 67% accuracy in predicting self-confidence. We further illustrate the feasibility of such interventions. The observed relationship between sentiment and self-confidence suggests that modifying sentiment could be a viable strategy for shaping self-confidence. Finally, we outline future research directions to support the deployment of self-confidence shaping in a real-world scenario for effective human-AI collaboration.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Human-Centric Reflective Architecture for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    HCRA turns collaborative recommendation into a stochastic game whose termination condition is driven by human-calibrated acceptance probability and linguistic self-reflection, yielding higher success rates than uncali...