Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unveiling Attractor Cycles in Large Language Models: A Dynamical Systems View of Successive Paraphrasing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.15208 v2 pith:PGE5E733 submitted 2025-02-21 cs.CL

Unveiling Attractor Cycles in Large Language Models: A Dynamical Systems View of Successive Paraphrasing

classification cs.CL
keywords llmssystemscyclesdynamicalparaphrasingsuccessivetextattractor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dynamical systems theory provides a framework for analyzing iterative processes and evolution over time. Within such systems, repetitive transformations can lead to stable configurations, known as attractors, including fixed points and limit cycles. Applying this perspective to large language models (LLMs), which iteratively map input text to output text, provides a principled approach to characterizing long-term behaviors. Successive paraphrasing serves as a compelling testbed for exploring such dynamics, as paraphrases re-express the same underlying meaning with linguistic variation. Although LLMs are expected to explore a diverse set of paraphrases in the text space, our study reveals that successive paraphrasing converges to stable periodic states, such as 2-period attractor cycles, limiting linguistic diversity. This phenomenon is attributed to the self-reinforcing nature of LLMs, as they iteratively favour and amplify certain textual forms over others. This pattern persists with increasing generation randomness or alternating prompts and LLMs. These findings underscore inherent constraints in LLM generative capability, while offering a novel dynamical systems perspective for studying their expressive potential.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Chaos in reason: How chain-of-thought LLMs can look for an answer

    nlin.CD 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Greedy LLM inference shows bounded, jump-like sensitivity to sub-token perturbations that the authors interpret as chaotic, with attention expanding and normalization suppressing perturbations.