Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MAMM-Refine: A Recipe for Improving Faithfulness in Generation with Multi-Agent Collaboration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.15272 v1 pith:YULQTU7C submitted 2025-03-19 cs.CL cs.AI

MAMM-Refine: A Recipe for Improving Faithfulness in Generation with Multi-Agent Collaboration

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords multi-agentcollaborationgenerationmulti-modelrefinementcritiquingrecipetasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-agent collaboration among models has shown promise in reasoning tasks but is underexplored in long-form generation tasks like summarization and question-answering. We extend multi-agent multi-model reasoning to generation, specifically to improving faithfulness through refinement, i.e., revising model-generated outputs to remove factual inconsistencies. We investigate how iterative collaboration among multiple instances and types of large language models (LLMs) enhances subtasks in the refinement process, such as error detection, critiquing unfaithful sentences, and making corrections based on critiques. We design intrinsic evaluations for each subtask, with our findings indicating that both multi-agent (multiple instances) and multi-model (diverse LLM types) approaches benefit error detection and critiquing. Additionally, reframing critiquing and refinement as reranking rather than generation tasks improves multi-agent performance. We consolidate these insights into a final "recipe" called Multi-Agent Multi-Model Refinement (MAMM-Refine), where multi-agent and multi-model collaboration significantly boosts performance on three summarization datasets as well as on long-form question answering, demonstrating the effectiveness and generalizability of our recipe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Stepwise Questioning Expert-Editor Multi-Agent Framework for Long-Document Summarization

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    An expert-editor stepwise-questioning multi-agent pipeline improves ROUGE/BERTScore/FactCC for long scientific summarization on two datasets relative to direct generation and HERA.