Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Advancing Human-Machine Teaming: Concepts, Challenges, and Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.16518 v2 pith:LXTUJAV4 submitted 2025-03-16 cs.HC cs.AIcs.LG

Advancing Human-Machine Teaming: Concepts, Challenges, and Applications

classification cs.HC cs.AIcs.LG
keywords teamingchallengesethicalhuman-machinelearningscalablesystemsacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Human-Machine Teaming (HMT) is revolutionizing collaboration across domains such as defense, healthcare, and autonomous systems by integrating AI-driven decision-making, trust calibration, and adaptive teaming. This survey presents a comprehensive taxonomy of HMT, analyzing theoretical models, including reinforcement learning, instance-based learning, and interdependence theory, alongside interdisciplinary methodologies. Unlike prior reviews, we examine team cognition, ethical AI, multi-modal interactions, and real-world evaluation frameworks. Key challenges include explainability, role allocation, and scalable benchmarking. We propose future research in cross-domain adaptation, trust-aware AI, and standardized testbeds. By bridging computational and social sciences, this work lays a foundation for resilient, ethical, and scalable HMT systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Morality of Probability: How Implicit Moral Biases in LLMs May Shape the Future of Human-AI Symbiosis

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    Six large language models consistently rated care and virtue outcomes as most moral and libertarian outcomes as least moral across 54 AI-generated dilemma variants, with reasoning models more context-sensitive but les...