Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Know What You do Not Know: Verbalized Uncertainty Estimation Robustness on Corrupted Images in Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.03440 v1 pith:KYJZLUCC submitted 2025-04-04 cs.CV cs.LG

Know What You do Not Know: Verbalized Uncertainty Estimation Robustness on Corrupted Images in Vision-Language Models

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords modelsuncertaintybeenlanguageanswerscorruptedknowtext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

To leverage the full potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) it is crucial to have some information on their answers' uncertainty. This means that the model has to be able to quantify how certain it is in the correctness of a given response. Bad uncertainty estimates can lead to overconfident wrong answers undermining trust in these models. Quite a lot of research has been done on language models that work with text inputs and provide text outputs. Still, since the visual capabilities have been added to these models recently, there has not been much progress on the uncertainty of Visual Language Models (VLMs). We tested three state-of-the-art VLMs on corrupted image data. We found that the severity of the corruption negatively impacted the models' ability to estimate their uncertainty and the models also showed overconfidence in most of the experiments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Small Vision-Language Models Know When They Are Wrong But Cannot Say So: A Two-Model Study of Stated versus Internal Confidence Under Realistic Image Degradation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In two small VLMs, internal token probability detects errors with AUROC up to 0.99 while verbalized confidence stays near 0.9 and performs near chance, except under severe low light where both fail.

  2. Bigger or Cheaper? Scale and Quantization Effects on Uncertainty Signals in Vision-Language Models Under Image Degradation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    In Qwen2-VL under image degradation, scale raises internal error-detection AUROC from 0.80 to 0.98 while verbalized confidence stays weak, and 4-bit hurts the confidence signal far more than accuracy, so a 7B-4bit mod...