Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SAGE: A Search-AuGmented Evaluation of Large Language Models on Free-Form QA

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.07385 v3 pith:OV7B2DLV submitted 2025-04-10 cs.CL cs.AI

SAGE: A Search-AuGmented Evaluation of Large Language Models on Free-Form QA

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords sageevaluationllmsstaticanswersexternalfree-formlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly used for question-answering (QA), relying on static, pre-annotated references for evaluation poses significant challenges in cost, scalability, and completeness. Meanwhile, using LLMs themselves as evaluators without external grounding remains unreliable for objective tasks, as they systematically over-accept incorrect answers, fabricate supporting rationales, and degrade sharply on questions that fall outside their training data. We propose Search-AuGmented Evaluation (SAGE), a framework to assess LLM outputs without fixed ground-truth answers. Unlike conventional metrics that compare to static references or depend solely on LLM-as-a-judge knowledge, SAGE acts as an agent that actively retrieves and synthesizes external evidence. It iteratively generates web queries, collects information, summarizes findings, and refines subsequent searches through reflection. By reducing dependence on static reference-driven evaluation protocols, SAGE offers a scalable and adaptive alternative for evaluating the factuality of LLMs. Experimental results on multiple free-form QA benchmarks show that SAGE achieves substantial to perfect agreement with human evaluations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Transparent Reference-free Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended User Survey Responses

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    An LLM-judge framework with a gibberish filter scores human survey responses on effort, relevance, and completeness, matching expert ratings (Spearman up to 0.86 English) better than length, embedding, and DeepEval baselines.