pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.13081 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-17 · ✦ hep-ex · hep-ph

Combination and interpretation of differential Higgs boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 19:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex hep-ph
keywords Higgs bosondifferential cross sectionproton-proton collisionsCMS detectorstandard modelkappa frameworkeffective field theorycoupling limits
0
0 comments X

The pith

Combined differential cross sections of the Higgs boson from four decay channels agree with standard model predictions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper combines analyses of Higgs boson production in the gamma-gamma, ZZ, WW, and tau-tau decay channels using 138 inverse femtobarns of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV. Differential spectra are measured in fiducial regions that match the experimental selections, then extrapolated to the full phase space to obtain combined distributions. A total production cross section of 53.4 plus 2.9 minus 2.9 statistical plus 1.9 minus 1.8 systematic picobarns is obtained, consistent with the standard model expectation of 55.6 plus or minus 2.5 picobarns. The fiducial results are further interpreted to set limits on Higgs boson couplings to other particles in both the kappa framework and the standard model effective field theory. Such measurements test whether new physics alters Higgs production or decay kinematics without large changes to the overall rate.

Core claim

The central claim is that combined fiducial differential spectra from the four decay channels, extrapolated to full phase space, yield a total cross section of 53.4 +2.9-2.9 (stat) +1.9-1.8 (syst) pb consistent with the standard model prediction of 55.6 ± 2.5 pb, with the spectra used to derive limits on Higgs couplings in the κ-framework and SMEFT.

What carries the argument

Combination of differential spectra measured in a fiducial region matching experimental selections across four decay channels, then extrapolated to full phase space.

If this is right

  • The fiducial differential spectra constrain possible modifications to Higgs boson couplings via the κ-framework.
  • The measurements limit the coefficients of operators in the standard model effective field theory that could alter Higgs production.
  • Kinematic regions in the differential spectra provide sensitivity to new physics effects that vary with energy or momentum.
  • The total cross section result serves as a benchmark for consistency with standard model calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Persistent agreement at higher precision would further narrow the allowed parameter space for standard model extensions that change Higgs interactions selectively.
  • The same combination techniques could be extended to rarer Higgs production modes or additional decay channels in future data sets.
  • Specific patterns of deviation in differential bins could help distinguish between different new physics scenarios beyond the current interpretation frameworks.

Load-bearing premise

The extrapolation of differential measurements from the fiducial region to the full phase space assumes Monte Carlo simulations accurately model detector response, acceptance, and efficiency corrections.

What would settle it

A statistically significant deviation in any measured differential distribution, such as the Higgs boson transverse momentum spectrum, from the corresponding standard model prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.13081 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Measurement of the total differential cross section as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measurement of the total differential cross section as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Measurement of the total differential cross section as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Measurement of the total differential cross section as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Negative log-likelihood scan of the total Higgs boson production cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Observed and expected simultaneous fits for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: For the case of coupling dependence of the branching fractions, the normalization of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simultaneous fit for κt and cg , observed and expected, assuming a coupling depen￾dence of the branching fractions (left) and with the branching fractions of the decay channels entering the combination implemented as nuisance parameters with no dependence on the cou￾plings (right). The 68% and 95% CL contours are shown in solid and dashed lines for observed data, the expected contours are indicated by the … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simultaneous fit for κt and κb , observed and expected, assuming a coupling depen￾dence of the branching fractions (left) and with the branching fractions of the decay channels entering the combination implemented as nuisance parameters with no dependence on the couplings (right). The 68% and 95% CL contours are indicated by the solid and dashed lines for the observed data, the expected contours are indica… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Observed and expected two-dimensional scans for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The values of the diagonal entries of the Fisher information matrix, presented as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Graphical representation of the ten eigenvectors with the highest eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Summary of observed and expected confidence intervals at 68% and 95% confi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Correlation matrix of the linear combinations of Wilson coefficients obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Precision measurements of Higgs boson differential production cross sections are a key tool to probe the properties of the Higgs boson and test the standard model. New physics can affect both Higgs boson production and decay, leading to deviations from the distributions that are expected in the standard model. In this paper, combined measurements of differential spectra in a fiducial region matching the experimental selections are performed, based on analyses of four Higgs boson decay channels ($\gamma\gamma$, ZZ$^{(*)}$, WW$^{(*)}$, and $\tau\tau$) using proton-proton collision data recorded with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The differential measurements are extrapolated to the full phase space and combined to provide the differential spectra. A measurement of the total Higgs boson production cross section is also performed using the $\gamma\gamma$ and ZZ decay channels, with a result of 53.4 $^{+2.9}_{-2.9}$ (stat) $^{+1.9}_{-1.8}$ (syst) pb, consistent with the standard model prediction of 55.6 $\pm$ 2.5 pb. The fiducial measurements are used to compute limits on Higgs boson couplings using the $\kappa$-framework and the SM effective field theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents combined measurements of differential Higgs boson production cross sections in fiducial regions matching experimental selections, based on CMS data at √s = 13 TeV with 138 fb^{-1} integrated luminosity across four decay channels (γγ, ZZ(*), WW(*), ττ). The spectra are extrapolated to full phase space and combined; a total cross section of 53.4^{+2.9}_{-2.9} (stat) ^{+1.9}_{-1.8} (syst) pb is extracted from the γγ and ZZ channels and found consistent with the SM prediction of 55.6 ± 2.5 pb. The fiducial results are interpreted to set limits on Higgs couplings in the κ-framework and SMEFT.

Significance. If the results hold, this constitutes a valuable precision measurement that combines multiple channels to improve sensitivity to differential distributions, enabling tighter tests of the Standard Model and constraints on new physics. The total cross-section result adds to the body of evidence for SM-like Higgs production rates, while the fiducial-based interpretations in both κ-framework and EFT provide model-independent handles on couplings. The large dataset and multi-channel approach are strengths that enhance the robustness of the reported spectra and limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately reflects the content and results presented in the paper, including the combined differential cross sections, the total cross section measurement, and the interpretations in the κ-framework and SMEFT. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; measurement is data-driven and self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents combined fiducial differential cross-section measurements across four decay channels from 138 fb^{-1} of CMS data at 13 TeV, followed by extrapolation to full phase space and a total cross-section extraction of 53.4^{+2.9}_{-2.9}(stat)^{+1.9}_{-1.8}(syst) pb from the γγ and ZZ channels. These results are obtained directly from observed event yields after applying acceptance and efficiency corrections derived from simulation, with dedicated systematic uncertainties assigned to the modeling. The comparison to the SM prediction of 55.6 ± 2.5 pb and the subsequent κ-framework/EFT limits are post-measurement interpretations that do not feed back into the reported cross sections. No equation or step equates the final result to its own inputs by construction, and external benchmarks (prior LHC measurements, theory calculations) remain independent.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental data analysis and standard theoretical inputs from prior literature rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Model predictions for Higgs production and decay are used for extrapolation and comparison.
    Invoked for fiducial-to-full-phase-space extrapolation and consistency checks.
  • domain assumption Detector effects and efficiencies are correctly modeled in simulations.
    Required for acceptance corrections in the extrapolation step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1340 out tokens · 79884 ms · 2026-05-22T19:01:56.670152+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncovering Hidden Systematics in Neural Network Models for High Energy Physics

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural networks for HEP tasks can be fooled at significant rates by subtle perturbations inside uncertainty envelopes, revealing hidden systematics not captured by conventional methods.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, arXiv:1207.7235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  2. [2]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s = 7 and 8 TeV”, JHEP 06 (2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081, arXiv:1303.4571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  3. [3]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  4. [4]

    Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 , arXiv:2104.01927

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 2015

  5. [5]

    Measurement of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fiducial production cross sections in the diphoton decay channel with pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fiducial production cross sections in the diphoton decay channel with pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 07 (2023) 091, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)091, arXiv:2208.12279. 28

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)091 2023

  6. [6]

    Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 08 (2023) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)040, arXiv:2305.07532

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)040 2023

  7. [7]

    Measurement of the inclusive and differential Higgs boson production cross sections in the leptonic ww decay mode at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive and differential Higgs boson production cross sections in the leptonic ww decay mode at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 03 (2021) 003, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)003, arXiv:2007.01984

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)003 2021

  8. [8]

    Measurement of the inclusive and differential Higgs boson production cross sections in the decay mode to a pair of τ leptons in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive and differential Higgs boson production cross sections in the decay mode to a pair of τ leptons in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 081805, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081805, arXiv:2107.11486

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.081805 2022

  9. [9]

    Measurement of the production cross section of a Higgs boson with large transverse momentum in its decays to a pair of τ leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the production cross section of a Higgs boson with large transverse momentum in its decays to a pair of τ leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 857 (2024) 138964, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138964, arXiv:2403.20201

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138964 2024

  10. [10]

    Rapidity-Dependent Jet Vetoes

    S. Gangal, M. Stahlhofen, and F. J. Tackmann, “Rapidity-dependent jet vetoes”, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 054023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.054023, arXiv:1412.4792

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.054023 2015

  11. [11]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties”, 2013. arXiv:1307.1347. doi:10.5170/CERN-2013-004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5170/cern-2013-004 2013

  12. [12]

    LHC HXSWG interim recommendations to explore the coupling structure of a Higgs-like particle

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “LHC HXSWG interim recommendations to explore the coupling structure of a Higgs-like particle”, 2012. arXiv:1209.0040

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, “Dimension-six terms in the standard model lagrangian”, JHEP 10 (2010) 085, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)085, arXiv:1008.4884

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2010)085 2010

  14. [14]

    Measurement and interpretation of differential cross sections for Higgs boson production at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement and interpretation of differential cross sections for Higgs boson production at √s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 792 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.059, arXiv:1812.06504

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.059 2019

  15. [15]

    Combination and interpretation of differential Higgs boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV (HIG-23-013)

    “Combination and interpretation of differential Higgs boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV (HIG-23-013)”. HEPData (collection), 2025. https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.156816

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.156816 2025

  16. [16]

    Measurements of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections in the diphoton decay channel with pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurements of the Higgs boson inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections in the diphoton decay channel with pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, JHEP 08 (2022) 027, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)027, arXiv:2202.00487

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)027 2022

  17. [17]

    Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 11 (2024) 097, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)097, arXiv:2402.05742

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)097 2024

  18. [18]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST 19 (2024) P05064, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  19. [19]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”, 2016. doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002. References 29

    work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-002 2016

  20. [20]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 19, doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 , arXiv:2404.06614

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 2024

  21. [21]

    NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production

    K. Hamilton, P . Nason, E. Re, and G. Zanderighi, “NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production”, JHEP 10 (2013) 222, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)222, arXiv:1309.0017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)222 2013

  22. [22]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower monte carlo algorithms”, JHEP 11 (2004) 040, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  23. [23]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”, JHEP 11 (2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, arXiv:0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  24. [24]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX ”, JHEP 06 (2010) 043, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:1002.2581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010

  25. [25]

    Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM

    E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P . Slavich, and A. Vicini, “Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM”, JHEP 02 (2012) 088, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)088, arXiv:1111.2854

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2012)088 2012

  26. [26]

    Constraining Light-Quark Yukawa Couplings from Higgs Distributions

    F. Bishara, U. Haisch, P . F. Monni, and E. Re, “Constraining light-quark Yukawa couplings from Higgs distributions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 121801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.121801, arXiv:1606.09253

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.121801 2017

  27. [27]

    Effective Field Theory for Higgs properties parametrisation: the transverse momentum spectrum case

    M. Grazzini, A. Ilnicka, M. Spira, and M. Wiesemann, “Effective field theory for Higgs properties parametrisation: the transverse momentum spectrum case”, in 52nd Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions. 2017. arXiv:1705.05143

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Modeling BSM effects on the Higgs transverse-momentum spectrum in an EFT approach

    M. Grazzini, A. Ilnicka, M. Spira, and M. Wiesemann, “Modeling BSM effects on the Higgs transverse-momentum spectrum in an EFT approach”, JHEP 03 (2017) 115, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)115, arXiv:1612.00283

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2017)115 2017

  29. [29]

    SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide

    I. Brivio, “SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide”, JHEP 04 (2021) 073, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)073, arXiv:2012.11343

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)073 2021

  30. [30]

    Automated one-loop computations in the standard model effective field theory

    C. Degrande et al., “Automated one-loop computations in the standard model effective field theory”, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 096024, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.096024, arXiv:2008.11743

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.096024 2021

  31. [31]

    Electroweak Corrections to Higgs to $\gamma\gamma$ and $W^+W^-$ in the SMEFT

    S. Dawson and P . P . Giardino, “Electroweak corrections to Higgs boson decays toγγ and w+w− in standard model EFT”, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 095005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.095005, arXiv:1807.11504

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.095005 2018

  32. [32]

    Les Houches 2019 physics at TeV colliders: New physics working group report

    G. Brooijmans et al., “Les Houches 2019 physics at TeV colliders: New physics working group report”, in 11th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders: PhysTeV Les Houches. 2020. arXiv:2002.12220

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”, JHEP 07 (2014) 079, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301. 30

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  34. [34]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  35. [35]

    Robust independent validation of experiment and theory: Rivet version 3

    C. Bierlich et al., “Robust independent validation of experiment and theory: Rivet version 3”, SciPost Phys. 8 (2020) 026, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.2.026, arXiv:1912.05451

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.8.2.026 2020

  36. [36]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 , arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z ]. A Tables for the differential cross section measurements Tables A.1–A.7 show the measured combined differentia...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 2011