Reliable Disentanglement Multi-view Learning Against View Adversarial Attacks
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SIJ7NMCGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Trustworthy multi-view learning has attracted extensive attention because evidence learning can provide reliable uncertainty estimation to enhance the credibility of multi-view predictions. Existing trusted multi-view learning methods implicitly assume that multi-view data is secure. However, in safety-sensitive applications such as autonomous driving and security monitoring, multi-view data often faces threats from adversarial perturbations, thereby deceiving or disrupting multi-view models. This inevitably leads to the adversarial unreliability problem (AUP) in trusted multi-view learning. To overcome this tricky problem, we propose a novel multi-view learning framework, namely Reliable Disentanglement Multi-view Learning (RDML). Specifically, we first propose evidential disentanglement learning to decompose each view into clean and adversarial parts under the guidance of corresponding evidences, which is extracted by a pretrained evidence extractor. Then, we employ the feature recalibration module to mitigate the negative impact of adversarial perturbations and extract potential informative features from them. Finally, to further ignore the irreparable adversarial interferences, a view-level evidential attention mechanism is designed. Extensive experiments on multi-view classification tasks with adversarial attacks show that RDML outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a relatively large margin. Our code is available at https://github.com/Willy1005/2025-IJCAI-RDML.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Robust Fuzzy Multi-view Learning under View Conflict
R-FUML models network outputs as fuzzy memberships, applies entropy-based robust multi-view fusion, and uses memory-effect isolation plus penalties to mitigate view conflicts, outperforming 15 baselines on eight datasets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.