REVIEW 2 cited by
CAPTURE: Context-Aware Prompt Injection Testing and Robustness Enhancement
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
CAPTURE: Context-Aware Prompt Injection Testing and Robustness Enhancement
read the original abstract
Prompt injection remains a major security risk for large language models. However, the efficacy of existing guardrail models in context-aware settings remains underexplored, as they often rely on static attack benchmarks. Additionally, they have over-defense tendencies. We introduce CAPTURE, a novel context-aware benchmark assessing both attack detection and over-defense tendencies with minimal in-domain examples. Our experiments reveal that current prompt injection guardrail models suffer from high false negatives in adversarial cases and excessive false positives in benign scenarios, highlighting critical limitations. To demonstrate our framework's utility, we train CaptureGuard on our generated data. This new model drastically reduces both false negative and false positive rates on our context-aware datasets while also generalizing effectively to external benchmarks, establishing a path toward more robust and practical prompt injection defenses.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CrackedPDFs: A Controlled Benchmark for Hidden Prompt Injection in PDFs
A 29,322-PDF controlled benchmark shows that a hybrid structural-plus-text detector finds hidden PDF prompt injections under paired evaluation (0.960 F1; 100% pair ranking), while text-only baselines fail.
-
CrackedPDFs: A Controlled Benchmark for Hidden Prompt Injection in PDFs
A document-aware hybrid detector that inspects PDF structure before text flattening outperforms text-only guardrails and structural-only models on a new 29,322-file controlled hidden-prompt-injection benchmark.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.