Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

WereWolf-Plus: An Update of Werewolf Game setting Based on DSGBench

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.12841 v1 pith:V6AO3JWV submitted 2025-06-15 cs.AI cs.CL

WereWolf-Plus: An Update of Werewolf Game setting Based on DSGBench

classification cs.AI cs.CL
keywords reasoninggamerolesstrategicwerewolf-plusbenchmarkingevaluationflexible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rapid development of LLM-based agents, increasing attention has been given to their social interaction and strategic reasoning capabilities. However, existing Werewolf-based benchmarking platforms suffer from overly simplified game settings, incomplete evaluation metrics, and poor scalability. To address these limitations, we propose WereWolf-Plus, a multi-model, multi-dimensional, and multi-method benchmarking platform for evaluating multi-agent strategic reasoning in the Werewolf game. The platform offers strong extensibility, supporting customizable configurations for roles such as Seer, Witch, Hunter, Guard, and Sheriff, along with flexible model assignment and reasoning enhancement strategies for different roles. In addition, we introduce a comprehensive set of quantitative evaluation metrics for all special roles, werewolves, and the sheriff, and enrich the assessment dimensions for agent reasoning ability, cooperation capacity, and social influence. WereWolf-Plus provides a more flexible and reliable environment for advancing research on inference and strategic interaction within multi-agent communities. Our code is open sourced at https://github.com/MinstrelsyXia/WereWolfPlus.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MafiaScope: Non-Invasive, Time-Resolved Belief Probing for LLM Agents in Social Deduction Games

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Non-invasive per-utterance belief probes in Mafia, auto-scored against engine truth, expose poorly calibrated LLM confidence and 1.5× over-prediction of being suspected.

  2. MafiaScope: Non-Invasive, Time-Resolved Belief Probing for LLM Agents in Social Deduction Games

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A released open-source testbed that privately probes LLM agents' beliefs during Mafia games shows agents are overconfident, over-predict suspicion by 1.5x, and rarely change outcomes when wrong beliefs lock in a vote.