Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Value-Free Policy Optimization via Reward Partitioning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.13702 v4 pith:LUD2X2B6 submitted 2025-06-16 cs.LG cs.AI

Value-Free Policy Optimization via Reward Partitioning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords optimizationrewardlearningdirectlyfunctionmodelsobjectivepreference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Single-trajectory preference optimization methods learn from datasets of ((prompt, response, reward)) tuples, offering a practical alternative to pairwise preference learning by directly leveraging scalar feedback. Existing approaches such as Direct Reward Optimization (DRO) have demonstrated promising results but rely on value function estimation, introducing additional variance, optimization complexity, and sensitivity to off-policy data. We introduce Reward Partition Optimization (RPO), a simple and scalable reward-driven objective that eliminates the need for value function learning. RPO normalizes rewards through a partition-based formulation estimated directly from prompt-level reward distributions, yielding a stable supervised optimization objective without auxiliary models or reinforcement learning loops. We evaluate RPO across multiple encoder-decoder and decoder-only language models using automatic metrics, LLM-as-a-judge evaluations, and optimization stability analyses. Experimental results show that RPO consistently outperforms strong baselines, including SFT, KTO, and DRO, while producing more aligned, diverse, and less toxic generations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Safety Alignment of LMs via Non-cooperative Games

    cs.AI 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0

    Jointly training an Attacker and Defender LLM in a non-zero-sum game with pairwise preference judges produces a defender with much lower jailbreak success while preserving general utility.