Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

JETHICS: Japanese Ethics Understanding Evaluation Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.16187 v1 pith:6D2SRJRX submitted 2025-06-19 cs.CL cs.AI

JETHICS: Japanese Ethics Understanding Evaluation Dataset

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords ethicsdatasetjapanesejethicsevaluationgpt-4olargellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we propose JETHICS, a Japanese dataset for evaluating ethics understanding of AI models. JETHICS contains 78K examples and is built by following the construction methods of the existing English ETHICS dataset. It includes four categories based normative theories and concepts from ethics and political philosophy; and one representing commonsense morality. Our evaluation experiments on non-proprietary large language models (LLMs) and on GPT-4o reveal that even GPT-4o achieves only an average score of about 0.7, while the best-performing Japanese LLM attains around 0.5, indicating a relatively large room for improvement in current LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tears or Cheers? Benchmarking LLMs via Culturally Elicited Distinct Affective Responses

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    CEDAR is a 7-language, 2-modality benchmark of 10,962 culturally divergent emotion scenarios; 17 LLMs perform poorly, and prompt-language matching does not fix cultural misalignment.