REVIEW 1 cited by
JETHICS: Japanese Ethics Understanding Evaluation Dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
JETHICS: Japanese Ethics Understanding Evaluation Dataset
read the original abstract
In this work, we propose JETHICS, a Japanese dataset for evaluating ethics understanding of AI models. JETHICS contains 78K examples and is built by following the construction methods of the existing English ETHICS dataset. It includes four categories based normative theories and concepts from ethics and political philosophy; and one representing commonsense morality. Our evaluation experiments on non-proprietary large language models (LLMs) and on GPT-4o reveal that even GPT-4o achieves only an average score of about 0.7, while the best-performing Japanese LLM attains around 0.5, indicating a relatively large room for improvement in current LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Tears or Cheers? Benchmarking LLMs via Culturally Elicited Distinct Affective Responses
CEDAR is a 7-language, 2-modality benchmark of 10,962 culturally divergent emotion scenarios; 17 LLMs perform poorly, and prompt-language matching does not fix cultural misalignment.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.