Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

HRIBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Real-Time Human Perception in Human-Robot Interaction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.20566 v1 pith:YW6ELPN4 submitted 2025-06-25 cs.RO cs.CV

HRIBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Real-Time Human Perception in Human-Robot Interaction

classification cs.RO cs.CV
keywords hribenchhumanvlmscapabilitiesperceptionunderstandinghuman-robotmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-time human perception is crucial for effective human-robot interaction (HRI). Large vision-language models (VLMs) offer promising generalizable perceptual capabilities but often suffer from high latency, which negatively impacts user experience and limits VLM applicability in real-world scenarios. To systematically study VLM capabilities in human perception for HRI and performance-latency trade-offs, we introduce HRIBench, a visual question-answering (VQA) benchmark designed to evaluate VLMs across a diverse set of human perceptual tasks critical for HRI. HRIBench covers five key domains: (1) non-verbal cue understanding, (2) verbal instruction understanding, (3) human-robot object relationship understanding, (4) social navigation, and (5) person identification. To construct HRIBench, we collected data from real-world HRI environments to curate questions for non-verbal cue understanding, and leveraged publicly available datasets for the remaining four domains. We curated 200 VQA questions for each domain, resulting in a total of 1000 questions for HRIBench. We then conducted a comprehensive evaluation of both state-of-the-art closed-source and open-source VLMs (N=11) on HRIBench. Our results show that, despite their generalizability, current VLMs still struggle with core perceptual capabilities essential for HRI. Moreover, none of the models within our experiments demonstrated a satisfactory performance-latency trade-off suitable for real-time deployment, underscoring the need for future research on developing smaller, low-latency VLMs with improved human perception capabilities. HRIBench and our results can be found in this Github repository: https://github.com/interaction-lab/HRIBench.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HRIBench: Benchmarking Interaction-Centric Human-Robot Collaboration

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new benchmark for intent-aware human-robot collaboration shows current VLA robot policies fail at coordination and safety, while simulated practice improves real-world task success from 0.10 to 0.43.

  2. ERR@HRI 3.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Anticipation in Human-Robot Interactions

    cs.RO 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5

    ERR@HRI 3.0 supplies raw webcam datasets and tracks for reactive bystander failure detection and anticipatory outcome prediction in HRI, with three teams beating weak CNN baselines.