REVIEW 2 cited by
SCDF: A Speaker Characteristics DeepFake Speech Dataset for Bias Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
SCDF: A Speaker Characteristics DeepFake Speech Dataset for Bias Analysis
read the original abstract
Despite growing attention to deepfake speech detection, the aspects of bias and fairness remain underexplored in the speech domain. To address this gap, we introduce the Speaker Characteristics Deepfake (SCDF) dataset: a novel, richly annotated resource enabling systematic evaluation of demographic biases in deepfake speech detection. SCDF contains over 237,000 utterances in a balanced representation of both male and female speakers spanning five languages and a wide age range. We evaluate several state-of-the-art detectors and show that speaker characteristics significantly influence detection performance, revealing disparities across sex, language, age, and synthesizer type. These findings highlight the need for bias-aware development and provide a foundation for building non-discriminatory deepfake detection systems aligned with ethical and regulatory standards.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Toward Fair Speech Technologies: A Comprehensive Survey of Bias and Fairness in Speech AI
The paper delivers a unified framework for fairness in speech technologies by formalizing seven definitions, organizing research into three paradigms, diagnosing pipeline-specific biases, and mapping mitigations to th...
-
What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection
Underrepresented gender in training suffers higher deepfake-detection error; WavLM gaps stay large under balance, and all post-hoc calibrations leave the EER gap fixed at 1.317 pp.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.