Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Insights from the Algonauts 2025 Winners

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.10784 v1 pith:XIKFF63N submitted 2025-08-14 q-bio.NC cs.CV

Insights from the Algonauts 2025 Winners

classification q-bio.NC cs.CV
keywords werebrainchallengehourswinnersacrossactivityalgonauts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Algonauts 2025 Challenge just wrapped up a few weeks ago. It is a biennial challenge in computational neuroscience in which teams attempt to build models that predict human brain activity from carefully curated stimuli. Previous editions (2019, 2021, 2023) focused on still images and short videos; the 2025 edition, which concluded last month (late July), pushed the field further by using long, multimodal movies. Teams were tasked with predicting fMRI responses across 1,000 whole-brain parcels across four participants in the dataset who were scanned while watching nearly 80 hours of naturalistic movie stimuli. These recordings came from the CNeuroMod project and included 65 hours of training data, about 55 hours of Friends (seasons 1-6) plus four feature films (The Bourne Supremacy, Hidden Figures, Life, and The Wolf of Wall Street). The remaining data were used for validation: Season 7 of Friends for in-distribution tests, and the final winners for the Challenge were those who could best predict brain activity for six films in their held-out out-of-distribution (OOD) set. The winners were just announced and the top team reports are now publicly available. As members of the MedARC team which placed 4th in the competition, we reflect on the approaches that worked, what they reveal about the current state of brain encoding, and what might come next.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Predicted Cortex Is Not a Domain-General Prior: A Matched-Control Audit of Brain-Encoding Features for Video Memorability

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Predicted-brain features beat the visual backbone on VideoMem but lose on Memento10k for video memorability, so the benefit is dataset-specific.

  2. Predicted Cortex Is Not a Domain-General Prior: A Matched-Control Audit of Brain-Encoding Features for Video Memorability

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Predicted cortical responses from a brain-encoding model beat their own visual backbone on VideoMem but lose on Memento10k, so they are a dataset-specific memorability representation, not a domain-general prior.