Originality of resonance and locking phenomena in SFS $\varphi_0$ Josephson junction

M. Nashaat; Yu. M. Shukrinov

arxiv: 2508.13994 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Originality of resonance and locking phenomena in SFS φ₀ Josephson junction

M. Nashaat , Yu. M. Shukrinov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 22:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

keywords SFS Josephson junctionφ₀ junctionferromagnetic resonanceKittel resonanceBuzdin resonancespin-orbit interactionresonance synchronizationmicrowave radiation

0 comments

The pith

Two ferromagnetic resonances coexist and transform in one SFS φ₀ Josephson junction under microwave radiation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

A single SFS φ₀ Josephson junction can realize both the Kittel resonance from microwave radiation and the Buzdin resonance from superconducting current interacting with magnetization. The spin-orbit interaction couples the Josephson phase to the ferromagnetic layer, enabling transformations between these resonances by changing radiation or junction parameters. A combined resonance appears that shows features of both. This setup also produces double synchronization, locking both magnetic precession and Josephson oscillations to the external radiation. The findings point to rich physics in such hybrid systems for potential manipulation and applications.

Core claim

In an SFS φ₀ Josephson junction the spin-orbit interaction couples the Josephson phase with the magnetization of the ferromagnetic layer. This coupling produces the Kittel resonance when microwave radiation is applied and the Buzdin resonance through the interaction of the superconducting current with the magnetization. The resonances can transform into each other by varying the radiation or junction parameters, and a combined resonance displaying features of both can form. The same coupling causes double synchronization where both the magnetic precession and Josephson oscillations become synchronized to the external radiation.

What carries the argument

spin-orbit-induced coupling between the Josephson phase and ferromagnetic magnetization

If this is right

Variation of external radiation and junction parameters switches the resonance from Kittel to Buzdin type or creates a combined resonance.
Double synchronization allows external radiation to lock both magnetic precession and Josephson oscillations at once.
The resonance transformations provide a direct route to manipulate both types in the same device.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Resonance switching might appear in other hybrid superconductor-ferromagnet structures that include spin-orbit effects.
The double-locking behavior could support tunable microwave components that use resonance mode changes for signal control.
Simulations with different ferromagnetic thicknesses or temperatures would map the full range where these synchronizations appear.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-orbit interaction is strong enough to produce a φ₀ junction whose parameters allow the Buzdin resonance to appear from superconducting-current–magnetization coupling and to transform under external radiation.

What would settle it

An experiment varying microwave frequency and power on an SFS φ₀ junction that finds no transformation between resonance types and no double synchronization would show the claimed interplay does not occur.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.13994 by M. Nashaat, Yu. M. Shukrinov.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Manifestation of different resonances on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Interplay of resonance and locking in G2-geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We demonstrate the realization and interplay of two ferromagnetic resonances in one SFS $\varphi_0$ Josephson junction. First resonance that is realized under microwave radiation is the famous Kittel resonance. The other is Buzdin one appearing as a result of interaction of superconducting current and ferromagnetic interlayer magnetization. Transformations of one type of resonance to another under variation of external electromagnetic radiation and the $\varphi_0$ junction parameters open an interesting way to manipulation both of them. The combined ferromagnetic resonance that exhibits the features of both resonances is demonstrated too. The coupling of the Josephson phase with the magnetization of the ferromagnetic layer, caused by the spin-orbit interaction, leads to double synchronization, namely, synchronization of both magnetic precession and Josephson oscillations by external radiation. The obtained results demonstrate reach physics and unique opportunities for various applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Numerical simulations show Kittel and Buzdin resonance transformations plus double synchronization in an SFS φ0 junction, but the work stays inside standard coupled equations.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper uses numerical simulations to show how two different ferromagnetic resonances—the Kittel one from microwave drive and the Buzdin one from supercurrent-magnetization coupling—can transform into each other and combine in an SFS φ0 Josephson junction, leading to synchronization of both the magnetic precession and the Josephson oscillations. The work applies the standard coupled equations for the Josephson phase and the magnetization dynamics, including the spin-orbit induced φ0 shift. It demonstrates the interplay through parameter variations and shows the double synchronization effect. This is a legitimate extension of previous φ0 junction studies, and the numerics appear to reproduce the expected resonance frequencies and locking behaviors. What the paper does well is laying out the transformations clearly with sweeps that highlight how external radiation and junction parameters affect the resonances. The combined resonance mode is presented as having features of both originals, which could be useful for thinking about control in these devices. The soft spots are mostly in the reliance on numerical results without much analytical backing or error analysis. The outcomes depend on the specific choices for the φ0 parameters and damping, so it's not clear how robust the locking is across a wider range. But there are no internal contradictions or unsupported claims; it all fits within the conventional framework. This paper is aimed at specialists in superconducting spintronics and Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic interlayers. Someone working on resonance phenomena or synchronization in hybrid systems would get value from the concrete demonstrations of the interplay. It deserves a serious referee because the modeling is standard and the results are reproducible in principle from the equations. I would recommend sending it for peer review to get input on the numerical methods and possible experimental relevance.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically demonstrates the realization and interplay of Kittel and Buzdin ferromagnetic resonances in a single SFS φ₀ Josephson junction driven by microwave radiation. It reports transformations between these resonances upon varying external radiation and φ₀-junction parameters, the appearance of a combined resonance mode, and double synchronization in which both magnetic precession and Josephson oscillations lock to the external drive, all arising from the spin-orbit-induced coupling between Josephson phase and ferromagnetic magnetization.

Significance. If the numerical results hold under independent verification, the work illustrates how spin-orbit coupling in φ₀ junctions can produce controllable resonance interplay and locking within a single device. This adds concrete dynamical insight to the growing literature on hybrid superconducting-ferromagnetic systems and may inform applications in tunable Josephson electronics or magnonics. The use of standard LLG-Josephson equations with conventional numerics is a strength for reproducibility, though the absence of explicit parameter tables limits immediate falsifiability.

major comments (1)

[Numerical results / parameter sweeps] The central claim of double synchronization and resonance transformation rests on the numerical spectra; however, the manuscript does not report the precise values or ranges of the φ₀ shift, damping, and radiation amplitude at which the locking occurs (see the parameter-sweep discussion). Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the observed locking is a robust prediction or sensitive to post-hoc tuning.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The abstract contains the typographical error 'reach physics' which should read 'rich physics'.
[Methods / numerical procedure] A table listing all fixed and varied parameters (including Gilbert damping, exchange field, and microwave amplitude) together with the integration timestep and convergence checks would greatly improve reproducibility.
[Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the frequency units and the definition of the plotted spectral density to avoid ambiguity when comparing Kittel and Buzdin peaks.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. The feedback helps clarify how to strengthen the presentation of our numerical results. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Numerical results / parameter sweeps] The central claim of double synchronization and resonance transformation rests on the numerical spectra; however, the manuscript does not report the precise values or ranges of the φ₀ shift, damping, and radiation amplitude at which the locking occurs (see the parameter-sweep discussion). Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the observed locking is a robust prediction or sensitive to post-hoc tuning.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The parameter sweeps are shown in the figures, but we agree that explicit numerical ranges and representative values would improve reproducibility and allow readers to judge robustness directly. In the revised manuscript we will add a table (or expanded caption) that lists the intervals and specific values of the φ₀ shift, Gilbert damping, and microwave amplitude at which double synchronization and the resonance transformations are observed. These ranges are taken from the existing simulations and correspond to physically accessible regimes for SFS φ₀ junctions; the locking persists over finite intervals rather than isolated points, supporting robustness. We will also state the numerical tolerances used to identify locking. This addition addresses the concern without altering the conclusions or requiring new calculations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard dynamical modeling

full rationale

The manuscript solves the conventional coupled LLG equation for the ferromagnetic layer magnetization together with the resistively-shunted Josephson junction equation that includes the spin-orbit-induced φ₀ shift. Kittel resonance appears at the expected uniform-precession frequency, Buzdin resonance emerges directly from the supercurrent–magnetization torque term, and double synchronization is observed in the numerical spectra under microwave drive. All reported transformations and locking phenomena are direct numerical outputs of these equations; no parameter is fitted to the target resonance ratios and then re-labeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported via self-citation to forbid alternatives. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and externally falsifiable against established ferromagnetic-resonance and Josephson-junction benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions about spin-orbit coupling in SFS junctions and on numerical exploration of parameter space; no new particles or forces are introduced, but several junction parameters are varied without independent experimental anchors.

free parameters (1)

φ₀ junction parameters
Specific values of the built-in phase shift and related coupling strengths are varied to realize resonance transformations and synchronization.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Spin-orbit interaction produces a φ₀ phase shift that couples Josephson phase to ferromagnetic magnetization.
Invoked to explain both the Buzdin resonance and the double synchronization; taken from prior φ₀-junction literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5675 in / 1326 out tokens · 46748 ms · 2026-05-18T22:40:21.558591+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The dynamics of the φ₀ junction is described by the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG), resistively and capacitively shunted junction, and the Josephson equations dm/dt = −ωF/(1+α²)(m×h_eff + α[m×(m×h_eff)]), V̇ = [I − V + r ṁ_y − sin(φ − φ₀)]/β_c, φ̇ = V
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We demonstrate the realization and interplay of two ferromagnetic resonances in one SFS φ₀ Josephson junction... synchronization of both magnetic precession and Josephson oscillations by external radiation.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Originality of resonance and locking phenomena in SFS $\varphi_0$ Josephson junction

The combination of electric and magnetic fields demonstrates a chimera step in the IV-curve that shows both features of the Shapiro and Buzdin steps [8, 9]. It was stressed that the width of the chimera step is not a trivial sum of the SS and BS. The coupling between the superconducting phase and magnetization in Josephson junctions is intensively discuss...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[2]

A. Buzdin. Direct coupling between magnetism and superconducting current in the Josephson φ0 junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107005 (2008)

work page 2008
[3]

Yokoyama, M

T. Yokoyama, M. Eto, and Y. V. Nazarov. Anomalous Josephson effect induced by spin-orbit interaction and Zeeman effect in semiconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 89, 195407 (2014)

work page 2014
[4]

F. m. c. Konschelle, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret. Theory of the spin-galvanic effect and the anomalous phase shift φ0 in superconductors and Josephson junctions with intrinsic spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 92, 125443 (2015). 6

work page 2015
[5]

F. S. Bergeret, and I. V. Tokatly. Theory of diffusive φ0 Josephson junctions in the presence of spin-orbit coupling, EPL 110, 57005 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

Yu. M. Shukrinov. Anomalous Josephson effect, Phys. Usp. 65, 317 (2022)

work page 2022
[7]

Konschelle and A

F. Konschelle and A. Buzdin. Magnetic Moment Manipulation by a Josephson Current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017001 (2009)

work page 2009
[8]

S. A. Abdelmoneim, Yu. M. Shukrinov, K. V. Kulikov, H. ElSamman, and M. Nashaat. Locking of magnetization and Josephson oscillations at ferromagnetic resonance in a φ0 junction under external radiation, Phys. Rev. B106, 014505 (2022)

work page 2022
[9]

Yu. M. Shukrinov, Yu. M., E. Kovalenko, J. Tekic, K. Kulikov, and M. Nashaat. Buzdin, Shapiro and chimera steps in φ0 Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024511 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Nashaat, E

M. Nashaat, E. Kovalenko, and Yu. M. Shukrinov. Buzdin, Shapiro and chimera steps in φ0 Josephson Junctions. II. bifurcation, switching, and hysteresis, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024510 (2024)

work page 2024
[11]

A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. Feinberg, and M. Avignon, Anomalous Josephson current in junctions with spin polarizing quantum point contacts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107001 (2008)

work page 2008
[12]

Brunetti, A

A. Brunetti, A. Zazunov, A. Kundu, and R. Egger. Anomalous Josephson current, incipient time-reversal symmetry breaking, and Majorana bound states in interacting multilevel dots, Phys. Rev. B 88, 144515 (2013)

work page 2013
[13]

K. N. Nesterov, M. Houzet, and J. S. Meyer. Anomalous Josephson effect in semiconducting nanowires as a signature of the topologically nontrivial phase, Phys. Rev. B 93, 174502 (2016)

work page 2016
[14]

Kuzmanovski, J

D. Kuzmanovski, J. Linder, and A. Black-Schaffer. Quantum ground state control in superconductor-silicene structures: 0 −π transitions, φ0 -junctions, and Majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 180505 (2016)

work page 2016
[15]

Assouline, C

A. Assouline, C. Feuillet-Palma, N. Bergeal, T. Zhang, A. Mottaghizadeh, A. Zimmers, E. Lhuillier, M. Eddrie, P. Atkinson, M. Aprili, and H. Aubin. Spin-Orbit induced phase-shift in Bi2Se3 Josephson junctions. Nature communications, 10(1), 126 (2019)

work page 2019
[16]

Alidoust, S

M. Alidoust, S. Chenghao, and Z. Igor. Cubic spin- orbit coupling and anomalous Josephson effect in planar junctions, Phys. Rev. B 103 (6) L060503 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

Hasan, K

J. Hasan, K. N. Nesterov, S. Li, M. Houzet, J. S. Meyer and A. Levchenko. Anomalous Josephson effect in planar noncentrosymmetric superconducting devices. Phys. Rev. B, 106, 214518 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, and A. M. Bobkov. Magnetic eigenmodes in chains of coupled φ0-Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic weak links. JETP Letters, 119(3), pp.251-260 (2024)

work page 2024
[19]

Linder, Y

J. Linder, Y. Tanaka, T. Yokoyama, A. Sudbø, and N. Nagaosa. Interplay between superconductivity and ferromagnetism on a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 81, 184525 (2010)

work page 2010
[20]

B. Lu, K. Yada, A. A. Golubov, and Y. Tanaka. Anomalous Josephson effect in d-wave superconductor junctions on a topological insulator surface, Phys. Rev. B 92, 100503 (2015)

work page 2015
[21]

Dolcini, M

F. Dolcini, M. Houzet, and J. S. Meyer. Topological Josephson φ0 junctions, Phys. Rev. B 92, 035428 (2015)

work page 2015
[22]

Zyuzin, M

A. Zyuzin, M. Alidoust, and D. Loss. Josephson junction through a disordered topological insulator with helical magnetization, Phys. Rev. B 93, 214502 (2016)

work page 2016
[23]

Schrade, S

C. Schrade, S. Hoffman, S. and D. Loss. Detecting topological superconductivity with φ0 Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 95, 195421 (2017)

work page 2017
[24]

Zhang, Z

X. Zhang, Z. Lyu, G. Yang, B. Li, Y. L. Hou, T. Le, X. Wang, A. Wang, X. Sun, E. Zhuo, and G. Liu, Anomalous Josephson effect in topological insulator- based Josephson trijunction, Chinese Physics Letters, 39(1), 017401 (2022)

work page 2022
[25]

Shukrinov, I

Yu M. Shukrinov, I. R. Rahmonov, K. Sengupta, and A. Buzdin. Magnetization reversal by superconducting current in φ Josephson junctions, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 18 (2017)

work page 2017
[26]

Guarcello, and F

C. Guarcello, and F. S. Bergeret. Cryogenic memory element based on an anomalous Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13(3), 034012 (2020)

work page 2020
[27]

I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov, I. R. Rahmonov, A. A. Mazanik, K. Sengupta, and Yu. M. Shukrinov. Magnetization reversal in superconductor/insulating ferromagnet/superconductor Josephson junctions on a three-dimensional topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 102, 134505 (2020)

work page 2020
[28]

Nashaat, I

M. Nashaat, I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov, Yu. M. Shukrinov, I. R. Rahmonov, and K. Sengupta, Electrical control of magnetization in superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions on a three-dimensional topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054506 (2019)

work page 2019
[29]

G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, and A. M. Bobkov, Controllable magnetic states in chains of coupled φ0 Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic weak links. Physical Review B 109(5), 054523 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

G. A. Bobkov, A. M. Bobkov, and I. V. Bobkova. (2024).Voltage-driven dynamics of φ0 superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor Josephson junction chains. Physical Review B, 110(13), 134522 (2024)

work page 2024
[31]

Yu. M. Shukrinov, I. R. Rahmonov, A. Janalizadeh and M. R. Kolahchi. Anomalous Gilbert damping and Duffing features of the superconductor-ferromagnet- superconductor φ0 Josephson junction, Physical Review B, 104(22), 224511 (2021)

work page 2021
[32]

S. E. Barnes, M. Aprili, I. Petkovic and S. Maekawa. Ferromagnetic resonance with a magnetic Josephson junction, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 024020 (2011)

work page 2011
[33]

S. Mai, E. Kandelaki, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov. Interaction of Josephson and magnetic oscillations in Josephson tunnel junctions with a ferromagnetic layer, Phys. Rev.B 84, 144519 (2011)

work page 2011
[34]

Hikino, M

S. Hikino, M. Mori, S. Takahashi, and S. Maekawa, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 024008 (2011)

work page 2011
[35]

Nashaat, A

M. Nashaat, A. E. Botha, Yu. M. Shukrinov, Devil’s Staircases in SFS Josephson Junctions, Phys. Rev. B 97, 224514 (2018)

work page 2018
[36]

Li, Y.-L

L.-L. Li, Y.-L. Zhao, X.-X. Zhang, and Y. Sun, Possible Evidence for Spin-Transfer Torque induced by spin- triplet supercurrents. Chin. Phys. Lett. 35, 077401 (2018)

work page 2018
[37]

Tao Yua, Xi-Han Zhoua, Gerrit E. W. Bauerb,c and I. V. Bobkova. Electromagnetic proximity effect: Superconducting magnonics, and beyond, arXiv:2506.18502. 7

work page arXiv
[38]

K.-R. Jeon, C. , H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, X. Montiel, M. Eschrig, T. Wagner, S. Komori, A. Srivastava, J. W. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire. Effect of Meissner screening and trapped magnetic flux on magnetization dynamics in thick Nb/Ni80Fe20/Nb trilayers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 014061 (2019)

work page 2019
[39]

I. A. Golovchanskiy, N. N. Abramov, V. S. Stolyarov, V. I. Chichkov, M. Silaev, I. V. Shchetinin, A. A. Golubov, V. V. Ryazanov, A. V. Ustinov, and M. Y. Kupriyanov. Magnetization dynamics in proximity- coupled superconductor- ferromagnet-superconductor multilayers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024086 (2020)

work page 2020
[40]

Golovchanskiy, N.N

I.A. Golovchanskiy, N.N. Abramov, O.V. Emelyanova, I.V. Shchetinin, V.V. Ryazanov, A.A. Golubov, and V.S. Stolyarov, Magnetization dynamics in proximity-coupled superconductor-ferromagnet- superconductor Multilayers. II. Thickness dependence of the superconducting torque, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034025 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

S. V. Mironov and A. I. Buzdin, Giant demagnetization effects induced by superconducting films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 102601 (2021)

work page 2021
[42]

Silaev, Anderson-Higgs mass of magnons in superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor systems, Phys

M. Silaev, Anderson-Higgs mass of magnons in superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor systems, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, L061004 (2022)

work page 2022
[43]

Zhou and T

X.-H. Zhou and T. Yu, Gating ferromagnetic resonance of magnetic insulators by superconductors via modulating electric field radiation, Phys. Rev. B 108, 144405 (2023)

work page 2023
[44]

J. Li, J. Zhang, G. Yang, and W. Zhao, Efficient shift of ferromagnetic resonance by superconductor gating, Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 011419 (2025)

work page 2025
[45]

Hrabec, F

A. Hrabec, F. J. T. Gon¸ calves, C. S. Spencer, E. Arenholz, A. T. N’Diaye, R. L. Stamps, and C. H. Marrows. Spin-orbit interaction enhancement in permalloy thin films by pt doping. Phys. Rev. B, 93(1):014432, (2016)

work page 2016
[46]

R. W. Greening, D. A. Smith, Y. Lim, Z. Jiang, J. Barber, S. Dail, J. J. Heremans, and S. Emori. Current- induced spin–orbit field in permalloy interfaced with ultra thin ti and cu. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116(5), (2020)

work page 2020
[47]

A. Yu. Rusanov, M. Hesselberth, J. Aarts, and A. I. Buzdin. Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature in Nb/permalloy bilayers by controlling the domain state of the ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93(5):057002, (2004)

work page 2004
[48]

Kulikov, J

K. Kulikov, J. Teki´ c, E. Kovalenko, M. Nashaat, T. A. Belgibayev, Yu. M. Shukrinov. The uniqueness of the driven φ0 Josephson junction: when steps are not Shapiro, arXiv:2505.07976

work page arXiv
[49]

Janalizadeh, I

A. Janalizadeh, I. R. Rahmonov, S. A. Abdelmoneim, Yu. M. Shukrinov and M. R. Kolahchi, Nonlinear features of the superconductor–ferromagnet–superconductor φ0 Josephson junction in the ferromagnetic resonance region, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 13, 1155–1166, (2022)

work page 2022
[50]

Cai and E

L. Cai and E. M. Chudnovsky, Interaction of a nanomagnet with a weak superconducting link, Phys. Rev. B 82, 104429 (2010)

work page 2010
[51]

Trahms, L

M. Trahms, L. Melischek, J.F. Steiner, B. Mahendru, I. Tamir, N. Bogdanoff, O. Peters, G. Reecht, C.B. Winkelmann, F. von Oppen, and K.J. Franke, Diode effect in Josephson junctions with a single magnetic atom, Nature, 615, 628–633 (2023)

work page 2023

[1] [1]

Originality of resonance and locking phenomena in SFS $\varphi_0$ Josephson junction

The combination of electric and magnetic fields demonstrates a chimera step in the IV-curve that shows both features of the Shapiro and Buzdin steps [8, 9]. It was stressed that the width of the chimera step is not a trivial sum of the SS and BS. The coupling between the superconducting phase and magnetization in Josephson junctions is intensively discuss...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[2] [2]

A. Buzdin. Direct coupling between magnetism and superconducting current in the Josephson φ0 junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107005 (2008)

work page 2008

[3] [3]

Yokoyama, M

T. Yokoyama, M. Eto, and Y. V. Nazarov. Anomalous Josephson effect induced by spin-orbit interaction and Zeeman effect in semiconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 89, 195407 (2014)

work page 2014

[4] [4]

F. m. c. Konschelle, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret. Theory of the spin-galvanic effect and the anomalous phase shift φ0 in superconductors and Josephson junctions with intrinsic spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 92, 125443 (2015). 6

work page 2015

[5] [5]

F. S. Bergeret, and I. V. Tokatly. Theory of diffusive φ0 Josephson junctions in the presence of spin-orbit coupling, EPL 110, 57005 (2015)

work page 2015

[6] [6]

Yu. M. Shukrinov. Anomalous Josephson effect, Phys. Usp. 65, 317 (2022)

work page 2022

[7] [7]

Konschelle and A

F. Konschelle and A. Buzdin. Magnetic Moment Manipulation by a Josephson Current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017001 (2009)

work page 2009

[8] [8]

S. A. Abdelmoneim, Yu. M. Shukrinov, K. V. Kulikov, H. ElSamman, and M. Nashaat. Locking of magnetization and Josephson oscillations at ferromagnetic resonance in a φ0 junction under external radiation, Phys. Rev. B106, 014505 (2022)

work page 2022

[9] [9]

Yu. M. Shukrinov, Yu. M., E. Kovalenko, J. Tekic, K. Kulikov, and M. Nashaat. Buzdin, Shapiro and chimera steps in φ0 Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024511 (2024)

work page 2024

[10] [10]

Nashaat, E

M. Nashaat, E. Kovalenko, and Yu. M. Shukrinov. Buzdin, Shapiro and chimera steps in φ0 Josephson Junctions. II. bifurcation, switching, and hysteresis, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024510 (2024)

work page 2024

[11] [11]

A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. Feinberg, and M. Avignon, Anomalous Josephson current in junctions with spin polarizing quantum point contacts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107001 (2008)

work page 2008

[12] [12]

Brunetti, A

A. Brunetti, A. Zazunov, A. Kundu, and R. Egger. Anomalous Josephson current, incipient time-reversal symmetry breaking, and Majorana bound states in interacting multilevel dots, Phys. Rev. B 88, 144515 (2013)

work page 2013

[13] [13]

K. N. Nesterov, M. Houzet, and J. S. Meyer. Anomalous Josephson effect in semiconducting nanowires as a signature of the topologically nontrivial phase, Phys. Rev. B 93, 174502 (2016)

work page 2016

[14] [14]

Kuzmanovski, J

D. Kuzmanovski, J. Linder, and A. Black-Schaffer. Quantum ground state control in superconductor-silicene structures: 0 −π transitions, φ0 -junctions, and Majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 180505 (2016)

work page 2016

[15] [15]

Assouline, C

A. Assouline, C. Feuillet-Palma, N. Bergeal, T. Zhang, A. Mottaghizadeh, A. Zimmers, E. Lhuillier, M. Eddrie, P. Atkinson, M. Aprili, and H. Aubin. Spin-Orbit induced phase-shift in Bi2Se3 Josephson junctions. Nature communications, 10(1), 126 (2019)

work page 2019

[16] [16]

Alidoust, S

M. Alidoust, S. Chenghao, and Z. Igor. Cubic spin- orbit coupling and anomalous Josephson effect in planar junctions, Phys. Rev. B 103 (6) L060503 (2021)

work page 2021

[17] [17]

Hasan, K

J. Hasan, K. N. Nesterov, S. Li, M. Houzet, J. S. Meyer and A. Levchenko. Anomalous Josephson effect in planar noncentrosymmetric superconducting devices. Phys. Rev. B, 106, 214518 (2022)

work page 2022

[18] [18]

G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, and A. M. Bobkov. Magnetic eigenmodes in chains of coupled φ0-Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic weak links. JETP Letters, 119(3), pp.251-260 (2024)

work page 2024

[19] [19]

Linder, Y

J. Linder, Y. Tanaka, T. Yokoyama, A. Sudbø, and N. Nagaosa. Interplay between superconductivity and ferromagnetism on a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 81, 184525 (2010)

work page 2010

[20] [20]

B. Lu, K. Yada, A. A. Golubov, and Y. Tanaka. Anomalous Josephson effect in d-wave superconductor junctions on a topological insulator surface, Phys. Rev. B 92, 100503 (2015)

work page 2015

[21] [21]

Dolcini, M

F. Dolcini, M. Houzet, and J. S. Meyer. Topological Josephson φ0 junctions, Phys. Rev. B 92, 035428 (2015)

work page 2015

[22] [22]

Zyuzin, M

A. Zyuzin, M. Alidoust, and D. Loss. Josephson junction through a disordered topological insulator with helical magnetization, Phys. Rev. B 93, 214502 (2016)

work page 2016

[23] [23]

Schrade, S

C. Schrade, S. Hoffman, S. and D. Loss. Detecting topological superconductivity with φ0 Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 95, 195421 (2017)

work page 2017

[24] [24]

Zhang, Z

X. Zhang, Z. Lyu, G. Yang, B. Li, Y. L. Hou, T. Le, X. Wang, A. Wang, X. Sun, E. Zhuo, and G. Liu, Anomalous Josephson effect in topological insulator- based Josephson trijunction, Chinese Physics Letters, 39(1), 017401 (2022)

work page 2022

[25] [25]

Shukrinov, I

Yu M. Shukrinov, I. R. Rahmonov, K. Sengupta, and A. Buzdin. Magnetization reversal by superconducting current in φ Josephson junctions, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 18 (2017)

work page 2017

[26] [26]

Guarcello, and F

C. Guarcello, and F. S. Bergeret. Cryogenic memory element based on an anomalous Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13(3), 034012 (2020)

work page 2020

[27] [27]

I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov, I. R. Rahmonov, A. A. Mazanik, K. Sengupta, and Yu. M. Shukrinov. Magnetization reversal in superconductor/insulating ferromagnet/superconductor Josephson junctions on a three-dimensional topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 102, 134505 (2020)

work page 2020

[28] [28]

Nashaat, I

M. Nashaat, I. V. Bobkova, A. M. Bobkov, Yu. M. Shukrinov, I. R. Rahmonov, and K. Sengupta, Electrical control of magnetization in superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions on a three-dimensional topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054506 (2019)

work page 2019

[29] [29]

G. A. Bobkov, I. V. Bobkova, and A. M. Bobkov, Controllable magnetic states in chains of coupled φ0 Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic weak links. Physical Review B 109(5), 054523 (2024)

work page 2024

[30] [30]

G. A. Bobkov, A. M. Bobkov, and I. V. Bobkova. (2024).Voltage-driven dynamics of φ0 superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor Josephson junction chains. Physical Review B, 110(13), 134522 (2024)

work page 2024

[31] [31]

Yu. M. Shukrinov, I. R. Rahmonov, A. Janalizadeh and M. R. Kolahchi. Anomalous Gilbert damping and Duffing features of the superconductor-ferromagnet- superconductor φ0 Josephson junction, Physical Review B, 104(22), 224511 (2021)

work page 2021

[32] [32]

S. E. Barnes, M. Aprili, I. Petkovic and S. Maekawa. Ferromagnetic resonance with a magnetic Josephson junction, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 024020 (2011)

work page 2011

[33] [33]

S. Mai, E. Kandelaki, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov. Interaction of Josephson and magnetic oscillations in Josephson tunnel junctions with a ferromagnetic layer, Phys. Rev.B 84, 144519 (2011)

work page 2011

[34] [34]

Hikino, M

S. Hikino, M. Mori, S. Takahashi, and S. Maekawa, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 024008 (2011)

work page 2011

[35] [35]

Nashaat, A

M. Nashaat, A. E. Botha, Yu. M. Shukrinov, Devil’s Staircases in SFS Josephson Junctions, Phys. Rev. B 97, 224514 (2018)

work page 2018

[36] [36]

Li, Y.-L

L.-L. Li, Y.-L. Zhao, X.-X. Zhang, and Y. Sun, Possible Evidence for Spin-Transfer Torque induced by spin- triplet supercurrents. Chin. Phys. Lett. 35, 077401 (2018)

work page 2018

[37] [37]

Tao Yua, Xi-Han Zhoua, Gerrit E. W. Bauerb,c and I. V. Bobkova. Electromagnetic proximity effect: Superconducting magnonics, and beyond, arXiv:2506.18502. 7

work page arXiv

[38] [38]

K.-R. Jeon, C. , H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, X. Montiel, M. Eschrig, T. Wagner, S. Komori, A. Srivastava, J. W. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire. Effect of Meissner screening and trapped magnetic flux on magnetization dynamics in thick Nb/Ni80Fe20/Nb trilayers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 014061 (2019)

work page 2019

[39] [39]

I. A. Golovchanskiy, N. N. Abramov, V. S. Stolyarov, V. I. Chichkov, M. Silaev, I. V. Shchetinin, A. A. Golubov, V. V. Ryazanov, A. V. Ustinov, and M. Y. Kupriyanov. Magnetization dynamics in proximity- coupled superconductor- ferromagnet-superconductor multilayers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024086 (2020)

work page 2020

[40] [40]

Golovchanskiy, N.N

I.A. Golovchanskiy, N.N. Abramov, O.V. Emelyanova, I.V. Shchetinin, V.V. Ryazanov, A.A. Golubov, and V.S. Stolyarov, Magnetization dynamics in proximity-coupled superconductor-ferromagnet- superconductor Multilayers. II. Thickness dependence of the superconducting torque, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034025 (2023)

work page 2023

[41] [41]

S. V. Mironov and A. I. Buzdin, Giant demagnetization effects induced by superconducting films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 102601 (2021)

work page 2021

[42] [42]

Silaev, Anderson-Higgs mass of magnons in superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor systems, Phys

M. Silaev, Anderson-Higgs mass of magnons in superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor systems, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, L061004 (2022)

work page 2022

[43] [43]

Zhou and T

X.-H. Zhou and T. Yu, Gating ferromagnetic resonance of magnetic insulators by superconductors via modulating electric field radiation, Phys. Rev. B 108, 144405 (2023)

work page 2023

[44] [44]

J. Li, J. Zhang, G. Yang, and W. Zhao, Efficient shift of ferromagnetic resonance by superconductor gating, Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 011419 (2025)

work page 2025

[45] [45]

Hrabec, F

A. Hrabec, F. J. T. Gon¸ calves, C. S. Spencer, E. Arenholz, A. T. N’Diaye, R. L. Stamps, and C. H. Marrows. Spin-orbit interaction enhancement in permalloy thin films by pt doping. Phys. Rev. B, 93(1):014432, (2016)

work page 2016

[46] [46]

R. W. Greening, D. A. Smith, Y. Lim, Z. Jiang, J. Barber, S. Dail, J. J. Heremans, and S. Emori. Current- induced spin–orbit field in permalloy interfaced with ultra thin ti and cu. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116(5), (2020)

work page 2020

[47] [47]

A. Yu. Rusanov, M. Hesselberth, J. Aarts, and A. I. Buzdin. Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature in Nb/permalloy bilayers by controlling the domain state of the ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93(5):057002, (2004)

work page 2004

[48] [48]

Kulikov, J

K. Kulikov, J. Teki´ c, E. Kovalenko, M. Nashaat, T. A. Belgibayev, Yu. M. Shukrinov. The uniqueness of the driven φ0 Josephson junction: when steps are not Shapiro, arXiv:2505.07976

work page arXiv

[49] [49]

Janalizadeh, I

A. Janalizadeh, I. R. Rahmonov, S. A. Abdelmoneim, Yu. M. Shukrinov and M. R. Kolahchi, Nonlinear features of the superconductor–ferromagnet–superconductor φ0 Josephson junction in the ferromagnetic resonance region, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 13, 1155–1166, (2022)

work page 2022

[50] [50]

Cai and E

L. Cai and E. M. Chudnovsky, Interaction of a nanomagnet with a weak superconducting link, Phys. Rev. B 82, 104429 (2010)

work page 2010

[51] [51]

Trahms, L

M. Trahms, L. Melischek, J.F. Steiner, B. Mahendru, I. Tamir, N. Bogdanoff, O. Peters, G. Reecht, C.B. Winkelmann, F. von Oppen, and K.J. Franke, Diode effect in Josephson junctions with a single magnetic atom, Nature, 615, 628–633 (2023)

work page 2023