Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Game-Playing Agents with Generative Code Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.19506 v1 pith:3GMEITB4 submitted 2025-08-27 cs.LG cs.AI

Learning Game-Playing Agents with Generative Code Optimization

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords agentsgame-playinglearningcodegenerativelanguageoptimizationpolicies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a generative optimization approach for learning game-playing agents, where policies are represented as Python programs and refined using large language models (LLMs). Our method treats decision-making policies as self-evolving code, with current observation as input and an in-game action as output, enabling agents to self-improve through execution traces and natural language feedback with minimal human intervention. Applied to Atari games, our game-playing Python program achieves performance competitive with deep reinforcement learning (RL) baselines while using significantly less training time and much fewer environment interactions. This work highlights the promise of programmatic policy representations for building efficient, adaptable agents capable of complex, long-horizon reasoning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Overcoming the Weakest-Link Effect in LLM-Driven Program Optimization via Heterogeneous Edit Recombination

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    HERO optimizes programs by generating atomic edits without score feedback and selecting the highest-scoring subset of those edits, avoiding the 'weakest-link' failure of accepting or rejecting whole edit bundles.