pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.14109 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.supr-con

Giant field-free transverse Josephson diode effect in altermagnets

Bijay Kumar Sahoo , Abhiram Soori This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 15:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.supr-con
keywords altermagnetsJosephson diode effecttransverse supercurrentRashba spin-orbit couplingnonreciprocal transportNéel vectorfour-terminal junction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Altermagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling produce a field-free transverse Josephson diode effect with efficiencies above 3000 percent in four-terminal junctions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that altermagnets combined with Rashba spin-orbit coupling in a four-terminal Josephson junction geometry generate nonreciprocal transverse supercurrents without any external magnetic field. A longitudinal phase bias drives these currents to flow preferentially in one direction, producing a strong diode-like response along with an anomalous phase shift. Both the transverse and longitudinal effects can be adjusted by rotating the internal Néel vector and persist even with moderate disorder or imperfect interfaces. A reader would care because this setup offers a way to control superconducting current direction using only the material's built-in order rather than applied fields.

Core claim

The authors predict that altermagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling in four-terminal Josephson junctions support a transverse Josephson diode effect that remains field-free, where a longitudinal phase bias generates nonreciprocal transverse supercurrents and a finite anomalous phase shift, while the longitudinal current itself shows a Josephson diode effect, with both responses tunable via the Néel vector orientation and diode efficiencies exceeding 3000 percent, and the effect robust against moderate disorder and imperfect interfaces.

What carries the argument

The four-terminal Josephson junction geometry that combines altermagnetic order with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, allowing nonreciprocal transverse supercurrents to emerge directly from the microscopic Hamiltonian and to be controlled by the Néel vector.

If this is right

  • Unidirectional transverse supercurrents appear without external magnetic fields.
  • Diode efficiencies reach values exceeding 3000 percent.
  • Both transverse and longitudinal responses remain tunable by the Néel vector orientation.
  • The nonreciprocity persists under moderate disorder and imperfect interfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The combination could support field-free nonreciprocal elements in superconducting circuits for low-dissipation electronics.
  • Similar transverse nonreciprocity may occur in other antiferromagnetic systems that also carry strong spin-orbit effects.
  • Measuring the asymmetry in transverse current as a function of Néel vector angle in fabricated devices would directly test the prediction.

Load-bearing premise

Rashba spin-orbit coupling can be combined with altermagnetic order in the four-terminal Josephson geometry such that the transverse supercurrent nonreciprocity emerges robustly from the microscopic Hamiltonian without requiring fine-tuned parameters or external fields.

What would settle it

Fabricating a four-terminal Josephson junction on an altermagnet with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and measuring whether the transverse current-voltage curve shows nonreciprocity with efficiency above 3000 percent in the complete absence of magnetic fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.14109 by Abhiram Soori, Bijay Kumar Sahoo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the proposed four-terminal junction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. CPR: Transverse Josephson current ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Transverse critical currents ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Transverse (Longitudinal) diode effect coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. CPR: transverse Josephson current ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Transverse (Longitudinal) diode effect coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Transverse (Longitudinal) diode effect coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Transverse (Longitudinal) diode effect coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Transverse diode effect coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Energy versus superconducting phase difference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We predict a field-free transverse Josephson diode effect in altermagnets (AMs) with Rashba spin--orbit coupling, achieving diode efficiencies exceeding $3000\%$ and unidirectional transverse supercurrents in four-terminal junctions. In this geometry, a longitudinal phase bias generates transverse supercurrents that exhibit nonreciprocity and a finite anomalous phase shift, while the longitudinal current itself displays a Josephson diode effect. Both responses are tunable via the N\'eel vector orientation. We further show that the effect remains robust against moderate disorder and imperfect interfaces. These results establish AMs as a promising platform for nonreciprocal superconducting transport, with clear routes toward experimental realization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical study of four-terminal Josephson junctions incorporating altermagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling. It predicts a field-free transverse Josephson diode effect featuring diode efficiencies exceeding 3000%, unidirectional transverse supercurrents, nonreciprocity accompanied by an anomalous phase shift, a conventional Josephson diode effect in the longitudinal channel, and tunability by Néel-vector orientation. The predictions are obtained from a microscopic Hamiltonian and are reported to remain robust under moderate disorder and imperfect interfaces.

Significance. If the central predictions hold, the work identifies altermagnets as a promising platform for field-free nonreciprocal superconducting transport with exceptionally high efficiencies. The explicit microscopic derivation, demonstration of Néel-vector tunability, and numerical checks of robustness to disorder constitute clear strengths that could guide experimental efforts in mesoscopic superconductivity and spintronics.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Results section] The precise definition of diode efficiency (e.g., the ratio of critical currents or the normalized form used to obtain values >3000%) should be stated explicitly in the main text or methods, together with the corresponding equation.
  2. [Figure 2 and Figure 3] Figure captions for the current-phase relations and efficiency plots would benefit from indicating the specific values of the Rashba strength, altermagnetic exchange, and junction lengths employed in the calculations.
  3. [Introduction] A brief comparison with existing literature on altermagnetic Josephson junctions or Rashba-based diodes would help situate the reported efficiencies and the transverse geometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive report, which accurately summarizes our main results on the field-free transverse Josephson diode effect in altermagnets. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and the recognition of the microscopic derivation, Néel-vector tunability, and robustness checks as strengths. No specific major comments were raised in the report, so we outline our planned minor revisions below and confirm that all points can be addressed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper constructs a microscopic Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian for a four-terminal Josephson junction incorporating altermagnetic exchange and Rashba SOC, then computes the transverse supercurrent and diode efficiency by direct numerical solution of the scattering problem or BdG equations. No parameters are fitted to the target observables; the reported >3000% efficiencies and field-free nonreciprocity follow from the model equations without self-definition or renaming of known results. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central prediction. The derivation is therefore independent and falsifiable against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the prediction rests on standard Bogoliubov-de Gennes modeling of Josephson junctions plus altermagnetic and Rashba terms whose explicit forms are not shown.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard mean-field treatment of superconductivity in the presence of altermagnetic order and Rashba spin-orbit coupling
    Invoked implicitly to obtain the supercurrent-phase relations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5644 in / 1296 out tokens · 32194 ms · 2026-05-18T15:59:49.286553+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometry induced net spin polarization of $d$-wave altermagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rectangular d-wave altermagnets acquire net spin polarization from geometry-induced imbalance in occupied spin states via anisotropic Fermi contours and finite-size k-space sampling, vanishing when Lx equals Ly or in ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Phys

    B. Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Phys. Lett.1, 251 (1962)

    work page 1962

  2. [2]

    Furusaki, Josephson current carried by andreev lev- els in superconducting quantum point contacts, Super- lattices Microstruct.25, 809 (1999)

    A. Furusaki, Josephson current carried by andreev lev- els in superconducting quantum point contacts, Super- lattices Microstruct.25, 809 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, and T. Ono, Observation of 5 superconducting diode effect, Nature584, 373 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, J. Pic´ o-Cort´ es, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Effect of rashba and dres- selhaus spin–orbit coupling on supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral anisotropy of ballistic Josephson junc- tions, J. Phys. : Co...

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Turini, S

    B. Turini, S. Salimian, M. Carrega, A. Iorio, E. Stram- bini, F. Giazotto, V. Zannier, L. Sorba, and S. Heun, Josephson diode effect in high-mobility InSb nanoflags, Nano Lett.22, 8502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Tanaka, B

    Y. Tanaka, B. Lu, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of giant diode effect ind-wave superconductor junctions on the sur- face of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B106, 214524 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Costa, J

    A. Costa, J. Fabian, and D. Kochan, Microscopic study of the Josephson supercurrent diode effect in Josephson junctions based on two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B108, 054522 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    B. Lu, S. Ikegaya, P. Burset, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Tunable josephson diode effect on the surface of topolog- ical insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 096001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Margineda, J

    D. Margineda, J. S. Claydon, F. Qejvanaj, and C. Check- ley, Observation of anomalous josephson effect in nonequilibrium Andreev interferometers, Phys. Rev. B 107, L100502 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    J. H. Correa and M. P. Nowak, Theory of universal diode effect in three-terminal Josephson junctions, Sci- Post Phys.17, 037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Mondal, P.-H

    S. Mondal, P.-H. Fu, and J. Cayao, Josephson diode effect with Andreev and Majorana bound states, arXiv:2503.08318 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in mag- netism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- als, Phys. Rev. B108, 184505 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Wei and J

    Y.-J. Wei and J. Wang, Anomalous josephson effect in altermagnet, EPL148, 56003 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Andreev reflection in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 054511 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Phys

    M. Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Phys. Rev. B108, L060508 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Nagae, A

    Y. Nagae, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ikegaya, Spin-polarized specular Andreev reflections in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, L100507 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nat. Commun.15, 1801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, dc Joseph- son effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 076003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    C. W. J. Beenakker and T. Vakhtel, Phase-shifted An- dreev levels in an altermagnet Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B108, 075425 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced superconductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, L060508 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Cheng and Q.-F

    Q. Cheng and Q.-F. Sun, Orientation- dependent Josephson effect in spin-singlet superconductor/altermagnet/spin-triplet supercon- ductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B109, 024517 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    B. Lu, K. Maeda, H. Ito, K. Yada, and Y. Tanaka,φ Josephson junction induced by altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 226002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B110, 024503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Sharma and M

    L. Sharma and M. Thakurathi, Tunable Josephson diode effect in singlet superconductor-altermagnet-triplet superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B112, 104506 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Goldberg and R

    C. Goldberg and R. E. Davis, New galvanomagnetic ef- fect, Phys. Rev.94, 1121 (1954)

    work page 1954

  32. [32]

    H. X. Tang, R. K. Kawakami, D. D. Awschalom, and M. L. Roukes, Giant planar Hall effect in epitaxial (Ga,Mn)As devices, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 107201 (2003)

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Roy and P

    A. Roy and P. S. A. Kumar, Giant planar Hall effect in pulsed laser deposited permalloy films, J. Phys. D43, 365001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Annadi, Z

    A. Annadi, Z. Huang, K. Gopinadhan, X. R. Wang, A. Srivastava, Z. Q. Liu, H. H. Ma, T. P. Sarkar, T. Venkatesan, and Ariando, Fourfold oscillation in anisotropic magnetoresistance and planar Hall effect at the LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 heterointerfaces: Effect of carrier confinement and electric field on magnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. B87, 201102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    A. A. Taskin, H. F. Legg, F. Yang, S. Sasaki, Y. Kanai, K. Matsumoto, A. Rosch, and Y. Ando, Planar Hall effect from the surface of topological insulators, Nat. Commun. 8, 1340 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Suri and A

    D. Suri and A. Soori, Finite transverse conductance in topological insulators under an applied in-plane magnetic field, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter33, 335301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    A. Soori, Finite transverse conductance and anisotropic magnetoconductance under an applied in-plane mag- netic field in two-dimensional electron gases with strong spin–orbit coupling, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter33, 335303 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    B. K. Sahoo and A. Soori, Transverse currents in spin transistors, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter35, 365302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Das and A

    S. Das and A. Soori, Orientation dependent anomalous hall and spin hall currents at the junctions of altermag- nets withp-wave magnets (2025), arXiv:2508.15723

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    E. V. Bezuglyi, A. S. Rozhavsky, I. D. Vagner, and P. Wyder, Combined effect of Zeeman split- 6 ting and spin-orbit interaction on the Josephson cur- rent in a superconductor–two-dimensional electron gas– superconductor structure, Phys. Rev. B66, 052508 (2002)

    work page 2002

  41. [41]

    Rasmussen, J

    A. Rasmussen, J. Danon, H. Suominen, F. Nichele, M. Kjaergaard, and K. Flensberg, Effects of spin-orbit coupling and spatial symmetries on the Josephson cur- rent in SNS junctions, Phys. Rev. B93, 155406 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Maistrenko, B

    O. Maistrenko, B. Scharf, D. Manske, and E. M. Han- kiewicz, Planar Josephson Hall effect in topological Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B103, 054508 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Zeng, Transverse josephson diode effect in tilted dirac systems, Phys

    W. Zeng, Transverse josephson diode effect in tilted dirac systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 176002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    B. K. Sahoo and A. Soori, Four-terminal josephson junc- tions: diode effects, anomalous currents and transverse currents, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter37, 305302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Pankratova, H

    N. Pankratova, H. Lee, R. Kuzmin, K. Wickramas- inghe, W. Mayer, J. Yuan, M. G. Vavilov, J. Shabani, and V. E. Manucharyan, Multiterminal Josephson effect, Phys. Rev. X10, 031051 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Weber, K

    M. Weber, K. Leckron, L. Haag, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and H. C. Schneider, Ultrafast electron dynamics in altermagnetic materials (2024), arXiv:2411.08160

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Sim and J

    G. Sim and J. Knolle, Pair density waves and super- current diode effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, L020502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    H. G. Le Duc, W. J. Kaiser, and J. A. Stern, Energy- gap spectroscopy of superconductors using a tunneling microscope, Appl. Phys. Lett.50, 1921 (1987)

    work page 1921

  49. [49]

    G. S. Diniz and E. Vernek, Suppressed Kondo screen- ing in two-dimensional altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 155127 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    H.-R. Li, F. Lin, L. Li, D.-H. Xu, and J.-H. Sun, Kondo screening cloud ind-wave altermagnetic metal with cu- bic Rashba spin-orbit effect, Phys. Rev. B111, 245150 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    W. Chen, L. Zeng, and W. Zhu, Helicity-controlled spin Hall angle in 2D altermagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 017201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Reichlov´ a, R

    H. Reichlov´ a, R. L. Seeger, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lammel, M. Leivisk¨ a, V. Petˇ r´ ıˇ cek, P. Doleˇ zal, E. Schmoranzerov´ a, A. Bad’ura, A. Thomas, V. Baltz, L. Michez, J. Sinova, S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. Jung- wirth, and L. ˇSmejkal, Macroscopic time reversal symme- try breaking by staggered s...

    work page arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    Das and A

    S. Das and A. Soori, Crossed Andreev reflection in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 245424 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    G. Els, P. Lemmens, P. van Loosdrecht, G. G¨ untherodt, H. Lang, V. Thommen-Geiser, and H.-J. G¨ untherodt, De- termination of the superconducting energy gap ofRb 3C60 by electronic raman scattering, Physica C: Supercond. 307, 79 (1998)

    work page 1998

  55. [55]

    Gupta, G

    M. Gupta, G. V. Graziano, M. Pendharkar, J. T. Dong, C. P. Dempsey, C. Palmstrøm, and V. S. Pribiag, Gate- tunable superconducting diode effect in a three-terminal Josephson device, Nat. Commun.14, 3078 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    S. M. Frolov, D. J. Van Harlingen, V. A. Oboznov, V. V. Bolginov, and V. V. Ryazanov, Measure- ment of the current-phase relation of superconduc- tor/ferromagnet/superconductorπJosephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B70, 144505 (2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    J. A. Glick, V. Aguilar, A. B. Gougam, B. M. Niedziel- ski, E. C. Gingrich, R. Loloee, W. P. Pratt, and N. O. Birge, Phase control in a spin-triplet squid, Sci. Adv.4, eaat9457 (2018). 7 Appendix A: Hamiltonian Different contributions to the Hamiltonian in eq. (1) are summarized below. HL = Lx s −1X nx=1 Ly saX ny=Ly s +1 h −t 0(Ψ† nx+1,ny τzΨnx,ny +h.c.)...

    work page 2018