N\'eel-Vector-Orientation Induced Direction-Robust Spin Filtering in Two-Dimensional Altermagnets

Biplab Sanyal; Duo Wang; Jin Zou; Lipeng Song; Luyao Zhu; Wei Sun; Xin Chen; Xu Cheng; Yiwen Wu

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

N\'eel-Vector-Orientation Induced Direction-Robust Spin Filtering in Two-Dimensional Altermagnets

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that reorienting the Néel vector in the compensated two-dimensional altermagnet Ta2TeSeO converts it into an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal—one spin channel metallic, the other gapped—at zero net magnetization.

desk verdict A clear symmetry argument for a possible AFM half-metal, but the version mismatch and missing quantitative DFT results keep it from being checkable as submitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.17522 v3 pith:WX7QUX72 submitted 2025-10-20 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-ph

Xin Chen , Jin Zou , Lipeng Song , Wei Sun , Yiwen Wu , Luyao Zhu , Xu Cheng , Duo Wang

show 1 more author

Biplab Sanyal

This is my paper

classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-ph

keywords altermagnetismantiferromagnetichalf-metalWeylsemimetalNéelvectormagneticspacegroupspinfiltering2DmagnetsTa2TeSeO

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a compensated antiferromagnet can become a genuine half-metal—one spin channel metallic, the other gapped—without any net magnetization, simply by reorienting the Néel vector. In monolayer Ta2TeSeO, an altermagnetic Weyl semimetal with two spin-polarized Weyl-cone pairs pinned near the Fermi level, aligning the magnetic axis along the in-plane x or y direction breaks exactly the right mirror and rotation symmetries: one spin sector stays gapless while the other acquires a spin-orbit mass gap, and the surviving cones shift apart in energy so that only one spin channel retains a Fermi surface. The predicted longitudinal conductivity polarization is between 76.4% and 82.0% for every in-plane current direction at 20 K, with zero net moment. Because the in-plane anisotropy is nearly degenerate, weak strain or weak magnetic fields can reversibly switch which spin channel conducts, and the symmetry recipe is offered as a general design principle for other two-dimensional Lieb-lattice altermagnets.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is Néel-vector-oriented magnetic space-group reduction. Because a magnetic moment is an axial vector, a mirror reflection Mx acts as (Sx, Sy, Sz) → (Sx, −Sy, −Sz): fixing the Néel vector along x preserves Mx as a unitary symmetry but makes My magnetic (MyT), and forces C2z to pair with time reversal, leaving only C2zT. This determines whether the k·p mass term m σy, odd under the surviving mirror, is symmetry-forbidden in one spin sector (keeping it gapless) or symmetry-allowed in the other (gapping it), while the loss of unitary C2z permits independent energy shifts δ1 and δ3 of the two remaining Weyl cones, driving the semimetal-to-half-metal transition.

What would settle it

A spin-resolved DFT band-structure calculation of Ta2TeSeO with the Néel vector along x that finds Fermi-level crossings in both spin channels, or finds both surviving Weyl cones on the same side of the Fermi level, would falsify the half-metallic claim; likewise, a computed in-plane easy-axis anisotropy large enough to prevent Néel reorientation below reasonable fields would remove the switching premise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Fixing the Néel vector along x (or y) converts Ta2TeSeO from a compensated altermagnetic Weyl semimetal into an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. The unitary mirror Mx survives and protects the Weyl crossings in one spin sector, while the orthogonal mirror becomes a magnetic mirror, allowing a spin-orbit-induced mass term to open a gap only in the opposite sector. Simultaneously, breaking the unitary C2z symmetry, leaving only the antiunitary C2zT, lifts the energy equivalence of the two surviving mirror-pinned Weyl cones, so one cone moves above the Fermi level and the other below it. The result is a single-spin Fermi surface at zero net magnetization, a state the paper calls an intri

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on the DFT prediction that Ta2TeSeO is a compensated altermagnet with spin-polarized Weyl cones sitting right at the Fermi level and almost equal in-plane easy axes; if the cones are not at the Fermi level, or the symmetry-lowering shifts do not push one cone above and one below it, the half-metal is not realized.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

With the Néel vector along x, the spin-up channel is metallic and the spin-down channel is gapped; along y, the same half-metallic state appears with the spin polarization reversed.
With the Néel vector along z, both spin sectors acquire equal gaps, giving a compensated insulating state; along the in-plane diagonal, both sectors host energy-inequivalent gapped cones.
The longitudinal conductivity polarization remains positive for every in-plane current direction at charge neutrality and 20 K, ranging from 76.4% to 82.0%, demonstrating direction-robust spin filtering without a conventional spin-selective band gap.
Because the in-plane magnetic anisotropy is nearly degenerate, minute strain, weak magnetic fields, or, the paper suggests, circularly polarized light can reversibly switch the conducting spin channel without generating a net moment.
The mechanism yields concrete design criteria—mirror-protected altermagnetic Weyl cones near the Fermi energy, absence of horizontal mirror symmetry, and a Néel direction that lowers the magnetic space-group symmetry—and is predicted to extend to other two-dimensional decorated Lieb altermagnets such as V2SeSO and Nb2SeTeO.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension: because the mechanism only requires a mirror-pinned spin-polarized Weyl pair near the Fermi level and no horizontal mirror, a high-throughput first-principles search over Janus-type Lieb-lattice altermagnets should find additional platforms beyond Ta2TeSeO.
The half-metallic state here is gapless in the conducting channel, so spin-polarized scanning tunneling spectroscopy or angle-resolved photoemission would be a cleaner direct test of the single-spin Fermi surface than bulk conductivity, which sees the 76–82% polarization.
The residual antiunitary C2zT symmetry protects the gaplessness of the conducting channel; perturbations that preserve it should leave the half-metallic state intact, while perturbations that break it would open a gap in the conducting sector, providing a robustness criterion for device design.
The near-degeneracy of the in-plane easy axes suggests a two-state spin selector controlled by an order parameter with no stray field; engineering this degeneracy with strain could make the switching low-power and fast, relevant for antiferromagnetic spintronic memory concepts.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is the mechanism: rotating the Néel vector in a 2D altermagnet first turns one unitary mirror into a magnetic mirror, allowing a SOC mass in one spin sector, then breaking C2z lifts the energy equivalence of the surviving Weyl cones so one spin sector keeps a Fermi surface while the other gaps. That is a real conceptual step beyond the transport analogues and strain-driven half-semimetals cited in the paper. The symmetry logic itself is standard and coherent: Eq. (1) correctly handles axial-vector mirror transformations, Eq. (3) reflects the known mirror-forbidden sigma_y mass, and Eq. (5) is a reasonable k·p minimal model. The claim that a unitary mirror forbids the mass while an antiunitary one does not is correct, and the paper states the required conditions (M_z broken, Weyl cones near E_F, nearly degenerate in-plane anisotropy) explicitly. The authors also give a concrete material candidate, Ta2TeSeO, with calculated exchange parameters and a Néel temperature estimate in the SM.

The soft spots are real but mostly about presentation and missing numbers. The abstract and v1 metadata describe a gapless direction-robust filtering mechanism with 76.4–82.0% conductivity polarization at 20 K, while the v2 full text claims an intrinsic half-metal and contains no transport calculation at all. The title changed too. That is not a fatal flaw if the authors reconcile the versions, but as it stands the reader cannot tell which claim is being made. More importantly, the central half-metallic claim depends on the DFT values of delta_1 and delta_3 straddling E_F so that one cone is occupied and the other empty in the protected spin sector. The paper does not show those numbers: no SOC band-structure figure with spin projection, no extracted delta_1 and delta_3, no gap magnitude for the gapped sector, no Fermi-surface plot. The stress-test note worries about exactly this, and I think the concern lands. The symmetry argument permits the half-metal; it does not by itself prove the DFT realization. The claim that the two surviving cones are pushed to opposite sides of E_F is a quantitative assertion and needs the numbers.

The citation pattern looks fine. The paper distinguishes its result from prior work, and the SM existence is mentioned but not provided in the v2 text I have—that is a practical issue for referees.

Net: this is a serious paper with a plausible and possibly important mechanism, but the version inconsistency and missing quantitative evidence make it impossible to verify the central claim from the manuscript alone. I would send it to peer review: a good referee can force the authors to (a) merge the two versions, (b) provide the SOC band structure with spin-resolved Weyl cone positions and delta_1/delta_3 values, and (c) either add the transport calculation or remove the abstract's conductivity numbers. The symmetry analysis alone may be publishable even if the half-metal realization fails for this specific material, but the paper as written needs the numbers.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript claims that monolayer Ta2TeSeO is a compensated altermagnetic Weyl semimetal whose magnetic space group can be reduced by rotating the Néel vector, converting it into an intrinsic AFM half-metal. The symmetry argument (Eqs. 1–4) is: for n∥x/y one unitary mirror survives, protecting single-spin Weyl cones; the orthogonal mirror becomes magnetic, permitting an SOC-induced mass term in the opposite spin sector; breaking unitary C2z (leaving only C2zT) allows the two surviving cones in the protected sector to shift relative in energy (Eq. 5, δ1≠δ3), giving one spin channel a Fermi surface. The abstract additionally reports 76.4–82.0% conductivity polarization at 20 K from semiclassical transport, while the full text presents the central result as an intrinsic AFM half-metal with a single-spin Fermi surface.

Significance. The symmetry mechanism is clean, parameter-free, and potentially general: it identifies a concrete set of design criteria (Weyl cones near EF, no horizontal mirror Mz, switchable in-plane Néel vector). If the quantitative half-metallic state is actually realized, this would be a notable conceptual advance in antiferromagnetic spintronics. The k·p treatment of the forbidden mσy mass under a unitary mirror is standard and internally coherent. The manuscript explicitly uses DFT for material parameters and provides no free parameters fitted to the target result; these are strengths. However, the decisive numerical support for the central half-metal claim is absent, so the significance is conditional on data the manuscript does not currently contain.

major comments (3)

[Eq. (5), Fig. 3(b)] The central claim—half-metallicity for n∥x—rests on δ1≠δ3 straddling EF and on the opposite spin sector being fully gapped. The manuscript provides no SOC band-structure plot with an energy axis, no numerical values for δ1 and δ3, no gap magnitude for the gapped sector, and no spin-resolved Fermi surface or DOS. The phrase 'by small symmetry-compatible tuning (strain, gating)' indicates the effect may require additional tuning, but the nominal zero-strain state is not quantified. Without these numbers the half-metal claim cannot be checked from the manuscript as written.
[Abstract vs full text] The abstract reports quantitative transport (76.4–82.0% at 20 K, full-Brillouin-zone Wannier interpolation, semiclassical transport) but the full text contains no transport calculation, no conductivity-polarization formula, and no current-direction analysis. The full text instead emphasizes an 'intrinsic AFM half-metal' with a 'single-spin Fermi surface,' whereas the abstract describes a 'gapless, direction-robust spin-filtering mechanism that requires neither a spin-selective band gap nor a large velocity contrast.' These are different central claims. The manuscript must be made internally consistent and must either present the transport calculation or remove/adjust the quantitative abstract claim.
[Fermi-level position and Weyl-node energies] The mechanism requires symmetry-protected Weyl cones near EF in the SOC-free limit, and then a spin-selective gapping and energy shifting. The text states that theory predicts spin-polarized Weyl nodes pinned near the Fermi level and gives the Ta moment (~0.73 μB), but no SOC-free or SOC band-structure coordinates, node energies, or δ1, δ3 values are provided. If the nodes are not at EF, or if δ1 and δ3 do not straddle EF, the half-metallic state is not realized. Please provide the quantitative band structure and, ideally, the carrier density or DOS at EF for both spin channels.

minor comments (4)

[Title] The title contains a typo: 'Néel-V ector' should be 'Néel-Vector'.
[Fig. 3] Fig. 3 is captioned as spin-projected band structures for different Néel-vector orientations, but no energy axis, node energies, or gap sizes are given. Adding these would also address the major quantitative concerns.
[Notation] The direction 'd≡(110)' should be written as [110] (or {110} when referring to a family). Also, the text alternates between 'C2z' and 'C2zT' without a compact magnetic-space-group notation; a table of the surviving symmetry generators for each n would improve clarity.
[Eq. (4)] In Eq. (4), the proportionality m(n)∝λ|n⊥| is claimed but not derived in detail. A brief derivation or a sentence clarifying that n⊥ is the component of n perpendicular to the mirror plane would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No material circularity: the symmetry reduction is parameter-free and the half-metal conclusion is not forced by a fit; self-citations are background and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a symmetry analysis (Eqs. 1-5) applied to a DFT-derived altermagnetic Weyl semimetal. The mass amplitude m(n) ∝ λ|n⊥| and the scalar shifts δ1,δ3 are symmetry-allowed terms, not fitted to the target half-metallic state. Breaking unitary C2z permits δ1≠δ3 but does not, by itself, force one cone above and one below EF; the claimed half-metallicity therefore depends on unshown numerical DFT values (SOC band gap, δ1,δ3, Fermi-surface cross-section). That omission is an evidence gap, not a circular reduction. The manuscript also cites the authors' own prior works (refs. [16] and [19]), but only to contextualize spin-space-group symmetry and Lieb-lattice altermagnets; these citations do not carry the central half-metal argument. The abstract's 'gapless spin filtering' and the full text's 'half-metallicity' are mutually inconsistent characterizations, but inconsistency is not circularity. No self-definitional step, fitted-input-as-prediction, or uniqueness-imported-from-authors pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the mass amplitude and scalar shifts are symmetry-allowed and computed from DFT, not fit to the target result. The main input is the DFT ground state of Ta2TeSeO (a domain assumption), not a fit. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are invented.

assumptions (4)

standard math Axial-vector transformation rules for magnetic moments under mirror and rotation (Eq. 1, 2).
Used throughout to decide which unitary symmetries survive for a given Néel-vector orientation.
domain assumption Ta2TeSeO is a compensated altermagnet with mirror-pinned Weyl cones near EF and with Mz absent.
Established by DFT in this paper/SM, not by experiment; the entire half-metal mechanism depends on it.
domain assumption Once a unitary mirror is lost, the SOC mass term mσy is symmetry-allowed; antiunitary mirrors do not protect crossings.
Standard k·p argument (Eq. 3–4) used to justify selective gapping.
domain assumption The in-plane magnetic anisotropy is nearly degenerate so the Néel vector can be reoriented with small fields or strain.
Taken from calculations (mentioned in text/SM); required for the switching claims.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of N\'eel-Vector-Orientation Induced Direction-Robust Spin Filtering in Two-Dimensional Altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WX7QUX72

@misc{pith2026251017522,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: N\'eel-Vector-Orientation Induced Direction-Robust Spin Filtering in Two-Dimensional Altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WX7QUX72}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.17522}
}

abstract

Whether an antiferromagnet can host direction-robust spin-polarized transport without a conventional spin-selective band gap remains a central challenge in antiferromagnetic spintronics. Here we establish a gapless, direction-robust spin-filtering mechanism in a compensated two-dimensional altermagnetic Weyl semimetal that requires neither a spin-selective band gap nor a large velocity contrast between spin projections. Using Janus monolayer Ta$_2$TeSeO as a realistic platform, we combine symmetry analysis with first-principles calculations, full-Brillouin-zone Wannier interpolation, and semiclassical transport. Rotating the N\'eel vector removes a unitary-mirror constraint and shifts one Weyl-cone pair away from its parent high-symmetry line. For an in-plane N\'eel vector, the residual $C_{2z}\mathcal T$ symmetry forbids the independent $\sigma_y$ mass that would open a local gap, allowing the reconstructed cones to shift in momentum while remaining gapless. Breaking unitary $C_{2z}$ simultaneously lifts the energy equivalence of the remaining mirror-pinned Weyl cones. The resulting coexistence of a metallic spin-projected manifold and a low-DOS Weyl-derived manifold produces a predominantly DOS-driven conductance imbalance. At charge neutrality and 20~K, the longitudinal conductivity polarization for $\mathbf n\parallel x$ remains positive for every in-plane current direction and ranges from $76.4\%$ to $82.0\%$. The degenerate in-plane magnetic anisotropy facilitates reversible switching between symmetry-related spin-filtering states using strain or weak anisotropic fields. This N\'eel-vector-driven symmetry mechanism provides a general route to direction-robust gapless spin filtering in compensated altermagnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.17522 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (a) Top and side views of monolayer Ta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. Symmetry-selected spin-polarized transport under differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Spin-Locked Helical Currents and Charge-Neutral Spin-Channel Pumping in Altermagnetic Nanotubes
cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Altermagnetic nanotubes convert momentum-odd spin polarization into spin-locked helical currents and Faraday-pumped pure spin currents without spin-orbit coupling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y . Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

2024
[2]

Li, Y .-B

W.-T. Li, Y .-B. Wu, L. Zhuang, J.-T. Wang, and W.-M. Liu, Spin-orbit coupling-driven chirality switching of spin waves in altermagnets (2025), arXiv:2508.18585 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv 2025
[3]

Duan, M.-S

H.-J. Duan, M.-S. Fang, M.-X. Deng, and R. Wang, Néel vector and rashba soc effects on rkky interaction in 2dd-wave alter- magnets (2025), arXiv:2509.26285 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv 2025
[4]

Zhiheng, M

L. Zhiheng, M. Dengpan, C. Jiangtao, X. Yan, and L. Zhifeng, Spin-axis dynamic locking (2025), arXiv:2509.18476 [cond- mat.other]

arXiv 2025
[5]

and Bourée, F., Symmetry and magnetic structures, EPJ Web of Conferences22, 00010 (2012)

Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. and Bourée, F., Symmetry and magnetic structures, EPJ Web of Conferences22, 00010 (2012)

2012
[6]

van Leuken and R

H. van Leuken and R. A. de Groot, Half-metallic antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 1171 (1995)

1995
[7]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

2022
[8]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrel- ativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

2022

Show all 40 references

[9]

L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B102, 014422 (2020)

2020
[10]

Šmejkal, R

L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spon- taneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

2020
[11]

V . Leeb, A. Mook, L. Šmejkal, and J. Knolle, Spontaneous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236701 (2024)

2024
[12]

Šmejkal, A

L. Šmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

2022
[13]

H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y . Feng, Y . J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y . Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromag- net ruo2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

2022
[14]

Jungwirth, R

T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. Mac- Donald, J. Sinova, and L. Šmejkal, Altermagnetism: An unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton1, 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100162 (2025), published: 2025-08-04, Accessed: 2025-10-07

2025
[15]

Y .-P. Zhu, X. Chen, X.-R. Liu, Y . Liu, P. Liu, H. Zha, G. Qu, C. Hong, J. Li, Z. Jiang, X.-M. Ma, Y .-J. Hao, M.-Y . Zhu, W. Liu, M. Zeng, S. Jayaram, M. Lenger, J. Ding, S. Mo, K. Tanaka, M. Arita, Z. Liu, M. Ye, D. Shen, J. Wrachtrup, Y . Huang, R.-H. He, S. Qiao, Q. Liu, ...

2024
[16]

X. Chen, Y . Liu, P. Liu, Y . Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature640, 349 (2025)

2025
[17]

S.-J. Gong, C. Gong, Y .-Y . Sun, W.-Y . Tong, C.-G. Duan, J.-H. Chu, and X. Zhang, Electrically induced 2d half-metallic an- tiferromagnets and spin field effect transistors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 8511 (2018)

2018
[18]

Liu, S.-D

Y . Liu, S.-D. Guo, Y . Li, and C.-C. Liu, Two-dimensional fully compensated ferrimagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 116703 (2025)

2025
[19]

X. Chen, D. Wang, L. Li, and B. Sanyal, Giant spin-splitting and tunable spin-momentum locked transport in room temper- ature collinear antiferromagnetic semimetallic CrO monolayer, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 022402 (2023)

2023
[20]

L.-D. Yuan, A. B. Georgescu, and J. M. Rondinelli, Nonrela- tivistic spin splitting at the brillouin zone center in compensated magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 216701 (2024)

2024
[21]

Li and J

X. Li and J. Yang, First-principles design of spintronics materi- als, Natl. Sci. Rev.3, 365 (2016)

2016
[22]

Hu, Half-metallic antiferromagnet as a prospective material for spintronics, Adv

X. Hu, Half-metallic antiferromagnet as a prospective material for spintronics, Adv. Mater.24, 294 (2012)

2012
[23]

S.-D. Guo, Y . Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Valley polarization in twisted altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B110, L220402 (2024)

2024
[24]

Guo, Valley polarization in two-dimensional zero-net- magnetization magnets, Applied Physics Letters126, 080502 (2025)

S.-D. Guo, Valley polarization in two-dimensional zero-net- magnetization magnets, Applied Physics Letters126, 080502 (2025)

2025
[25]

Wu, Y .-l

B. Wu, Y .-l. Song, W.-x. Ji, P.-j. Wang, S.-f. Zhang, and C.-w. Zhang, Quantum anomalous hall effect in an antiferromagnetic monolayer of moo, Phys. Rev. B107, 214419 (2023)

2023
[26]

Li, A.-D

J.-Y . Li, A.-D. Fan, Y .-K. Wang, Y . Zhang, and S. Li, Strain- induced valley polarization, topological states, and piezo- magnetism in two-dimensional altermagnetic v2te2o, v2steo, v2sseo, and v2s2o, Applied Physics Letters125, 222404 (2024)

2024
[27]

J. Tian, J. Li, H. Liu, Y . Li, Z. Liu, L. Li, J. Li, G. Liu, and J. Shi, Spin-layer coupling in an altermagnetic multilayer: A design 6 principle for spintronics, Phys. Rev. B111, 035437 (2025)

2025
[28]

H.-Y . Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezo- magnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nature Communica- tions12, 2846 (2021)

2021
[29]

Xu and L

X. Xu and L. Yang, Alterpiezoresponse in two-dimensional lieb-lattice altermagnets, Nano Letters25, 11870 (2025)

2025
[30]

Y . Che, H. Lv, X. Wu, and J. Yang, Engineering altermagnetic states in two-dimensional square tessellations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036701 (2025)

2025
[31]

W. Xie, X. Xu, Y . Yue, H. Xia, and H. Wang, Piezovalley ef- fect and magnetovalley coupling in altermagnetic semiconduc- tors studied by first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B111, 134429 (2025)

2025
[32]

Jiang, X

Y . Jiang, X. Zhang, H. Bai, Y . Tian, B. Zhang, W.-J. Gong, and X. Kong, Strain-engineering spin-valley locking effect in altermagnetic monolayer with multipiezo properties, Applied Physics Letters126, 053102 (2025)

2025
[33]

I. Khan, D. Bezzerga, B. Marfoua, and J. Hong, Altermag- netism, piezovalley, and ferroelectricity in two-dimensional Cr2SeO altermagnet, npj 2D Materials and Applications9, 18 (2025)

2025
[34]

Sun, S.-C

X.-Q. Sun, S.-C. Zhang, and T. c. v. Bzdušek, Conversion rules for weyl points and nodal lines in topological media, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 106402 (2018)

2018
[35]

A. A. Zyuzin, S. Wu, and A. A. Burkov, Weyl semimetal with broken time reversal and inversion symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 85, 165110 (2012)

2012
[36]

H. Ueda, M. García-Fernández, S. Agrestini, C. P. Romao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chi- ral phonons in quartz probed by x-rays, Nature618, 946 (2023)

2023
[37]

M. Che, J. Liang, Y . Cui, H. Li, B. Lu, W. Sang, X. Li, X. Dong, L. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Sun, W. Jiang, E. Liu, F. Jin, T. Zhang, and L. Yang, Magnetic order induced chiral phonons in a ferro- magnetic weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196906 (2025)

2025
[38]

Chaudhary, D

S. Chaudhary, D. M. Juraschek, M. Rodriguez-Vega, and G. A. Fiete, Giant effective magnetic moments of chiral phonons from orbit-lattice coupling, Phys. Rev. B110, 094401 (2024)

2024
[39]

T. H. Hsieh, H. Lin, J. Liu, W. Duan, A. Bansil, and L. Fu, Topological crystalline insulators in the snte material class, Na- ture Communications3, 982 (2012)

2012
[40]

J. Liu, W. Duan, and L. Fu, Two types of surface states in topo- logical crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. B88, 241303 (2013)

2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y . Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

2024

[2] [2]

Li, Y .-B

W.-T. Li, Y .-B. Wu, L. Zhuang, J.-T. Wang, and W.-M. Liu, Spin-orbit coupling-driven chirality switching of spin waves in altermagnets (2025), arXiv:2508.18585 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv 2025

[3] [3]

Duan, M.-S

H.-J. Duan, M.-S. Fang, M.-X. Deng, and R. Wang, Néel vector and rashba soc effects on rkky interaction in 2dd-wave alter- magnets (2025), arXiv:2509.26285 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

arXiv 2025

[4] [4]

Zhiheng, M

L. Zhiheng, M. Dengpan, C. Jiangtao, X. Yan, and L. Zhifeng, Spin-axis dynamic locking (2025), arXiv:2509.18476 [cond- mat.other]

arXiv 2025

[5] [5]

and Bourée, F., Symmetry and magnetic structures, EPJ Web of Conferences22, 00010 (2012)

Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. and Bourée, F., Symmetry and magnetic structures, EPJ Web of Conferences22, 00010 (2012)

2012

[6] [6]

van Leuken and R

H. van Leuken and R. A. de Groot, Half-metallic antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 1171 (1995)

1995

[7] [7]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

2022

[8] [8]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrel- ativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

2022