pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.10595 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-13 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.stat-mech

Information phases of partial projected ensembles generated from random quantum states and scrambling dynamics

Alan Sherry , Saptarshi Mandal , Sthitadhi Roy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech
keywords partial projected ensemblesHolevo informationinformation phasesquantum scramblingHaar random stateschaotic circuitstripartite systemsmeasurement invisible phase
0
0 comments X

The pith

Partial projected ensembles from Haar-random states exhibit two information phases with Holevo information scaling either exponentially or linearly depending on subsystem sizes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates partial projected ensembles, which consist of mixed states on one part of a tripartite quantum system after discarding some measurement outcomes from the complement. It demonstrates that the Holevo information for these ensembles undergoes a qualitative change in its scaling with system size as the relative subsystem sizes are adjusted. In one phase the information decays exponentially, indicating a regime where quantum correlations remain invisible to measurements, while in the other it grows linearly. These phases are separated by sharp transitions and provide a more detailed picture of information distribution than standard entanglement measures such as logarithmic negativity. The structure also arises in the time evolution of states under chaotic quantum circuits.

Core claim

Using exact analytical results and numerical simulations, the authors show that the Holevo information in partial projected ensembles generated from Haar-random states displays a qualitative change in scaling with system size when varying the relative sizes of the subsystems. One phase is characterized by exponential decay of the Holevo information, while the other exhibits linear growth, with the transition points marked by non-analyticities. The exponentially decaying phase establishes the existence of a measurement-invisible quantum-correlated phase as a manifestation of many-body information scrambling that has no analogue in bipartite systems. This information phase diagram differs from

What carries the argument

The Holevo information computed on partial projected ensembles, which are ensembles of mixed states obtained by conditioning on projective measurements on part of the complement subsystem while discarding outcomes from the rest.

Load-bearing premise

The scaling of the Holevo information with system size in these partial projected ensembles depends primarily on the relative sizes of the three subsystems without significant dependence on the specific measurement basis or partition details.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation of the Holevo information for Haar-random tripartite states at subsystem size ratios near the predicted transition point that fails to show a change from exponential to linear scaling or lacks non-analyticity would falsify the existence of distinct information phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.10595 by Alan Sherry, Saptarshi Mandal, Sthitadhi Roy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic phase diagram for the Holevo infor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dynamics of the Holevo information, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Approach of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dynamics of the Holevo information, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. For the 1+1D brickwork, the data for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Behaviour of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The projected ensemble -- an ensemble of pure states on a subsystem conditioned on projective measurement outcomes on its complement -- provides a finer probe of ergodicity and information structure than the reduced density matrix of the subsystem in bipartite quantum states. This framework can be generalised to partial projected ensembles in tripartite settings, where outcomes from part of the measured subsystem are discarded, leading to ensembles of mixed states. We show that information measures defined for such ensembles, in particular the Holevo information, yield a more detailed characterisation of how quantum information is distributed between subsystems compared to conventional entanglement measures. Using exact analytical results supported by numerical results, we uncover a qualitative change in the scaling of the Holevo information with system size in partial projected ensembles generated by Haar-random states, as the relative sizes of the subsystem are varied. In one phase, the Holevo information decays exponentially with system size, while in the other it grows linearly, thereby defining distinct information phases separated by sharp transitions signalled by non-analyticities in the Holevo information. The exponentially decaying phase rigorously establishes the existence of a measurement-invisible quantum-correlated phase -- a manifestation of many-body information scrambling with no bipartite analogue. We contrast this information-phase diagram with the entanglement-phase structure of tripartite Haar-random states obtained from logarithmic negativity, and show that the Holevo information reveals additional fine structure beyond conventional entanglement measures. Finally, we show that these information phases, as characterised by the Holevo information, emerge in the dynamics of chaotic quantum circuits and discuss the associated timescales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes partial projected ensembles in tripartite quantum systems generated from Haar-random states. It derives exact analytical expressions for the Holevo information and shows that, as the relative sizes of the subsystems are varied, this quantity exhibits two distinct scaling regimes with total system size: exponential decay in one regime and linear growth in the other. These regimes are separated by sharp transitions marked by non-analyticities in the Holevo information, which the authors interpret as distinct information phases. The exponentially decaying phase is identified as a measurement-invisible quantum-correlated phase arising from many-body scrambling with no direct bipartite analogue. The information-phase diagram is contrasted with the entanglement-phase structure obtained from logarithmic negativity, and the same phases are shown to emerge in the dynamics of chaotic quantum circuits on appropriate timescales.

Significance. If the analytical results and numerical evidence hold, the work supplies a finer probe of information distribution in scrambled many-body systems than is available from reduced density matrices or bipartite entanglement measures alone. The rigorous identification of a measurement-invisible phase constitutes a concrete advance, as does the demonstration that the Holevo information on partial projected ensembles reveals additional structure beyond logarithmic negativity. The extension to chaotic-circuit dynamics indicates that the phases are dynamically accessible and not limited to static Haar-random ensembles.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that the observed scaling transition and the associated information phases are robust requires explicit verification that the location of the transition and the functional form of the Holevo scaling remain unchanged when the complement is repartitioned into the kept subsystem B and the discarded subsystem C while keeping |B| + |C| fixed. The analytical Haar-average expressions (derived for general subsystem dimensions) should be re-evaluated or supplemented with a short argument showing that the exponential-to-linear crossover is insensitive to the particular B/C split; otherwise the phase diagram risks being an artifact of the chosen tripartite decomposition rather than a general signature of scrambling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive major comment. We address it in detail below and will incorporate appropriate revisions to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the observed scaling transition and the associated information phases are robust requires explicit verification that the location of the transition and the functional form of the Holevo scaling remain unchanged when the complement is repartitioned into the kept subsystem B and the discarded subsystem C while keeping |B| + |C| fixed. The analytical Haar-average expressions (derived for general subsystem dimensions) should be re-evaluated or supplemented with a short argument showing that the exponential-to-linear crossover is insensitive to the particular B/C split; otherwise the phase diagram risks being an artifact of the chosen tripartite decomposition rather than a general signature of scrambling.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this insightful comment, which helps to clarify the generality of our findings. Our analytical expressions for the averaged Holevo information are indeed derived for arbitrary subsystem dimensions, which in principle permits analysis for any repartitioning of the complement. We agree that explicitly addressing the dependence on the B/C split is important to rule out any potential artifact. In the revised manuscript, we will add a short argument based on the general formulas demonstrating that the exponential-to-linear crossover point and the scaling behaviors are determined by the total complement size relative to the subsystem of interest and remain qualitatively unchanged under repartitioning with fixed total complement size. This will confirm that the identified information phases are a robust signature of scrambling dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation of information phases from Haar-random states

full rationale

The paper derives the scaling of Holevo information and the resulting information phases directly from exact analytical averages over Haar-random states in the tripartite setting, using standard definitions of the projected ensemble, partial projections, and the Holevo quantity. These expressions are obtained from first-principles integration over the unitary group and yield the exponential versus linear regimes as a function of relative subsystem sizes without any fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The non-analyticities marking the transitions emerge from the closed-form results themselves, and the contrast with logarithmic negativity is an independent comparison. Numerical checks on chaotic circuits serve as corroboration rather than the foundation of the claims. The derivation is therefore self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Builds directly on established quantum information concepts without introducing new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or postulated entities; relies on standard Haar randomness and Holevo definition.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Haar-random states and standard definitions of projected and partial projected ensembles
    Invoked throughout to generate the ensembles whose Holevo information is analyzed.
  • domain assumption Holevo information as a valid measure for characterizing information distribution in mixed-state ensembles
    Central to defining the information phases and transitions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5585 in / 1444 out tokens · 34769 ms · 2026-05-17T21:54:55.765142+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Emergence of Haar ensemble for the PE 5

    work page

  2. [2]

    Information phases of partial projected ensembles generated from random quantum states and scrambling dynamics

    Emergence of gHSe for the PPE 5 III. Information measures for partial projected ensembles 5 IV. Holevo information for Haar-random states 7 A. Computation ofχ(E PPER) 7 1.p≤1−2γ8 2.p >1−2γ9 B. Information phase diagram 9 V. Holevo information dynamics in chaotic circuits 11 A. All-to-all circuit 12 B. 1+1D brickwork circuit 13 VI. Summary and Outlook 14 ∗...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    For the higher moments, the condition is more subtle [20]

    Emergence of Haar ensemble for the PE For a Haar random state|Ψ⟩, the first moment,ρ R, of the PE onR, is known to be maximally mixed for |R| ≤N/2 asN→ ∞[50, 51]. For the higher moments, the condition is more subtle [20]. A theorem in Ref. [20] states that if DR ≥ 18π3(2k−1)(D R)4k ϵ2 (2kln(D R) + ln(2/δ)),(19) then the PE onRforms anϵ-approximatek-design...

    work page

  4. [4]

    First note that, if the PER∪Eforms a Haar ensemble, then the PPE onRtrivially forms a gHSe

    Emergence of gHSe for the PPE In the case of tripartite states, the conditions for the emergence of a gHSe onRinduced by measurements on Sand tracing outEare somewhat more complicated. First note that, if the PER∪Eforms a Haar ensemble, then the PPE onRtrivially forms a gHSe. Using the inequality in Eq. 19, we therefore have DS ≥ 18π3(2k−1)(D RDE)4k ϵ2 ln...

    work page

  5. [5]

    7 with Bob’s collective measurement strategy can achieve an information gain ofχ(E) bits per channel use asymp- totically asn→ ∞[46, 53, 54]

    Alice’s coding strategy in conjunction 2 Note that the joint ensemble ofn-fold input states is chosen such that the marginal 1-fold ensemble remainsE. 7 with Bob’s collective measurement strategy can achieve an information gain ofχ(E) bits per channel use asymp- totically asn→ ∞[46, 53, 54]. Thus, for an appro- priately defined operation, the Holevo infor...

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010) Chap. 9

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 15 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Advances in Physics65, 239–362 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X7, 031016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    J. R. Garrison and T. Grover, Does a single eigenstate encode the full hamiltonian?, Phys. Rev. X8, 021026 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Hayden and J

    P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: quan- tum information in random subsystems, Journal of High Energy Physics2007, 120–120 (2007)

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Sekino and L

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast scramblers, Journal of High Energy Physics2008, 065 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. J. Suh, Entanglement tsunami: Universal scaling in holographic thermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 011601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. J. Suh, Entanglement growth during ther- malization in holographic systems, Phys. Rev. D89, 066012 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Hosur, X.-L

    P. Hosur, X.-L. Qi, D. A. Roberts, and B. Yoshida, Chaos in quantum channels, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Swingle, Locality, Quantum Fluctuations, and Scrambling, Phys. Rev. X9, 031048 (2019). 19

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Schuch, M

    N. Schuch, M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, En- tropy scaling and simulability by matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 030504 (2008)

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    A. W. Harrow and A. Montanaro, Quantum computa- tional supremacy, Nature549, 203–209 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Boixo, S

    S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Babbush, N. Ding, Z. Jiang, M. J. Bremner, J. M. Martinis, and H. Neven, Characterizing quantum supremacy in near- term devices, Nature Physics14, 595–600 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, and R. Babbushet al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting pro- cessor, Nature574, 505–510 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of en- tanglement, Phys. Rev. A65, 032314 (2002)

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    M. B. Plenio, Logarithmic negativity: A full entangle- ment monotone that is not convex, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 090503 (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Entanglement in quantum information theory

    J. Eisert, Entanglement in quantum information theory (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0610253 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkel- stein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos, Nature613, 468 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, F. Hern´ andez, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Emer- gent Quantum State Designs from Individual Many-Body Wave Functions, PRX Quantum4, 010311 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Exact emergent quantum state designs from quantum chaotic dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Solvable model of deep ther- malization with distinct design times, Quantum6, 886 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Lucas, L

    M. Lucas, L. Piroli, J. De Nardis, and A. De Luca, Gen- eralized deep thermalization for free fermions, Phys. Rev. A107, 032215 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Dynamical purification and the emergence of quantum state designs from the pro- jected ensemble, PRX Quantum4, 030322 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Bhore, J.-Y

    T. Bhore, J.-Y. Desaules, and Z. Papi´ c, Deep thermaliza- tion in constrained quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B108, 104317 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    N. D. Varikuti and S. Bandyopadhyay, Unraveling the emergence of quantum state designs in systems with sym- metry, Quantum8, 1456 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Chan and A

    A. Chan and A. De Luca, Projected state ensemble of a generic model of many-body quantum chaos, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57, 405001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    D. K. Mark, F. Surace, A. Elben, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, G. Refael, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Maximum Entropy Principle in Deep Thermalization and in Hilbert-Space Ergodicity, Phys. Rev. X14, 041051 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Manna, S

    S. Manna, S. Roy, and G. J. Sreejith, Projected ensemble in a system with locally supported conserved charges, Phys. Rev. B111, 144302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    X.-H. Yu, W. W. Ho, and P. Kos, Mixed state deep ther- malization (2025), arXiv:2505.07795 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Sherry and S

    A. Sherry and S. Roy, Do mixed states exhibit deep ther- malisation? (2025), arXiv:2507.14135 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Mandal, P

    S. Mandal, P. W. Claeys, and S. Roy, Partial projected ensembles and spatiotemporal structure of information scrambling (2025), arXiv:2508.05632 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Sherry and S

    A. Sherry and S. Roy, Measurement-invisible quantum correlations in scrambling dynamics, Phys. Rev. B111, L180301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Bejan, B

    M. Bejan, B. B´ eri, and M. McGinley, Matchgate Circuits Deeply Thermalize, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 020401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  41. [41]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E50, 888 (1994)

    work page 1994

  42. [42]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature452, 854–858 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    J. M. Deutsch, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 082001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Lazarides, A

    A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving, Phys. Rev. E90, 012110 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Long-time behavior of isolated periodically driven interacting lattice systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 041048 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Jozsa, D

    R. Jozsa, D. Robb, and W. K. Wootters, Lower bound for accessible information in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A49, 668 (1994)

    work page 1994

  47. [47]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zangh` ı, On the distribution of the wave function for systems in thermal equilibrium, Journal of Statistical Physics125, 1193 (2006)

    work page 2006

  48. [48]

    C. Liu, Q. C. Huang, and W. W. Ho, Deep thermalization in gaussian continuous-variable quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 260401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Chang, H

    R.-A. Chang, H. Shrotriya, W. W. Ho, and M. Ippoliti, Deep thermalization under charge-conserving quantum dynamics, PRX Quantum6, 020343 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    A. S. Holevo, Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel, Prob- lems Inform. Transmission9, 177 (1973)

    work page 1973

  51. [51]

    Preskill, Quantum shannon theory (2025), arXiv:1604.07450 [quant-ph]

    J. Preskill, Quantum shannon theory (2025), arXiv:1604.07450 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    M. J. Hall, Random quantum correlations and density op- erator distributions, Physics Letters A242, 123 (1998)

    work page 1998

  53. [53]

    Zyczkowski and H.-J

    K. Zyczkowski and H.-J. Sommers, Induced measures in the space of mixed quantum states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34, 7111 (2001)

    work page 2001

  54. [54]

    Bansal, W.-K

    N. Bansal, W.-K. Mok, K. Bharti, D. E. Koh, and T. Haug, Pseudorandom density matrices, PRX Quan- tum6, 020322 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1291 (1993)

    work page 1993

  56. [56]

    Forrester,Log-Gases and Random Matrices (LMS-34) (Princeton University Press, 2010)

    P. Forrester,Log-Gases and Random Matrices (LMS-34) (Princeton University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Henderson and V

    L. Henderson and V. Vedral, Classical, quantum and to- tal correlations, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34, 6899 (2001)

    work page 2001

  58. [58]

    A. S. Holevo, The capacity of the quantum channel with general signal states, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory44, 269 (1998)

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    Schumacher and M

    B. Schumacher and M. D. Westmoreland, Sending classi- cal information via noisy quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A56, 131 (1997)

    work page 1997

  60. [60]

    Shapourian, S

    H. Shapourian, S. Liu, J. Kudler-Flam, and A. Vish- wanath, Entanglement negativity spectrum of random mixed states: A diagrammatic approach, PRX Quantum 2, 030347 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zangh` ı, 20 Canonical typicality, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 050403 (2006)

    work page 2006

  62. [62]

    Teufel, R

    S. Teufel, R. Tumulka, and C. Vogel, Canonical typicality for other ensembles than micro-canonical, Annales Henri Poincar´ e26, 1477 (2024)

    work page 2024