pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.23962 · v6 · submitted 2025-12-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.supr-con· hep-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Lectures on insulating and conducting quantum spin liquids

Subir Sachdev
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.supr-conhep-th
keywords quantum spin liquidsfractionalized Fermi liquidcuprate pseudogapd-wave superconductorAncilla Layer Modelhole pocketsBogoliubov quasiparticles
0
0 comments X

The pith

The fractionalized Fermi liquid state explains small hole pockets in the cuprate pseudogap and anisotropic quasiparticle velocities in the d-wave superconductor.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review establishes that doping insulating quantum spin liquids with gauge-neutral electron-like quasiparticles produces a fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*) state capable of matching two key experimental signatures in hole-doped cuprates. The state accounts for angle-dependent magnetoresistance data that reveal small hole pockets with coherent interlayer tunneling in the pseudogap metal. It simultaneously produces the observed strong anisotropy in nodal Bogoliubov velocities where v_F greatly exceeds v_Δ in the d-wave superconducting phase. A sympathetic reader would care because these features have resisted earlier attempts to describe the pseudogap and superconductor as simple doped spin liquids, and a single construction now organizes both.

Core claim

The central claim is that the FL* state, obtained by doping a quantum spin liquid with gauge-neutral electron-like quasiparticles, resolves the difficulties of prior doped-spin-liquid theories for the cuprates. When the fermionic parton theory is doped, it yields a d-wave superconductor with nearly isotropic quasiparticle velocities; the Ancilla Layer Model construction of the FL* state in a single-band Hubbard model then supplies the pseudogap metal with small hole pockets that tunnel coherently between layers, consistent with ADMR measurements including the Yamaji effect.

What carries the argument

The Ancilla Layer Model (ALM), a construction that adds an ancilla layer to represent electron fractionalization and produces a wavefunction for the FL* state of the Hubbard model.

If this is right

  • The pseudogap metal is described as an FL* state whose small pockets tunnel coherently between layers, matching the Yamaji effect in ADMR.
  • Doping the fermionic parton theory produces a d-wave superconductor whose nodal quasiparticles have v_F much larger than v_Δ.
  • The same ALM wavefunction for the FL* state reproduces observations in ultracold-atom realizations of the Hubbard model.
  • Doping the bosonic parton theory yields a holon metal that applies to ultracold-atom experiments on the Lieb lattice rather than cuprates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The FL* framework may generalize to other doped Mott insulators where small pockets and velocity anisotropy appear together.
  • Ultracold-atom experiments could directly test the holon-metal predictions on lattices where the bosonic parton theory applies.
  • If the ALM wavefunction remains accurate at higher doping, it could guide numerical searches for the transition from FL* to conventional Fermi liquid.

Load-bearing premise

That the Ancilla Layer Model construction accurately represents the physics of the single-band Hubbard model without uncontrolled approximations that change the predicted small-pocket structure or velocity anisotropy.

What would settle it

Direct measurement showing large Fermi surfaces instead of small hole pockets in angle-dependent magnetoresistance, or observation of nearly equal v_F and v_Δ in the nodal directions of the d-wave superconductor, would falsify the FL* description.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.23962 by Subir Sachdev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Feynman diagram leading to (7). ing antiferromagnet. The main ingredient here will be a bosonic collective mode representing antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations in the metal: this boson is the ‘paramagnon’. Near the transition from the Fermi liquid to the antiferromagnetic metal, it is possible to derive a systematic approach to the paramagnon modes of a metal. We begin with an electronic Hubbard model H =… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Antiferromagnetic (Néel) order N of the spin density wave state. This can be an insulator at p = 0, provided ∆ = N is large enough, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Fermi surface of the original dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fermi surfaces of the Néel state at half-filling, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fermi surfaces of the Néel state at p > 0. The pockets are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fermi surfaces of the Néel state at p < 0, with pockets as in Figs. 4. From (16), the area of each electron pocket on the left (when ∆ is large and there are no hole pockets) is |p|/2, in units with the square lattice Brillouin zone having unit area. This follows from the existence of 1 independent electron pocket in the magnetic Brillouin zone with a spin degeneracy of 2. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectral density of hole (left) and electron (right) pockets at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Orientation of the nearest neighbor Q¯ i j on the triangular lattice. Also shown are the labels of the 3 sublattices. The saddle-point value of the Q¯ satisfies Q¯ i j = 〈ϵαβ biα bjβ 〉 (32) Note that Q¯ i j = −Q¯ ji indicating that Q¯ i j is a directed field - an orientation has to be chosen on every link. These saddle-point equations have been solved for the square and triangular lattices with nearest nei… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spinon dispersion on the triangular lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Dispersion of bosonic spinons in a square lattice spin liquid, from Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A vison on the triangular lattice [28]. The center of the vison is marked by the X. The wavy line is the ‘branch-cut’ where we have sgn(Qv i j) = −sgn(Q¯ i j) only on the links crossed by the line. Plotted is the minimization result of E[{Q¯ i j }] with α = 1,β = −2, K = 0.5. Minimization is done with the cluster embedded in a vison￾free lattice with all nearest neighbor links equal to Q¯ i j . The number… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Magnetic ordering transition driven by tuning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Adiabatic motion of a vison (denoted by the X) around a single site of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Mutual statistics of e and m particles. This process leads to a Berry phase of −1, when the e particle crosses the branch cut of the m particle. for non-integer values of nb . So inclusion of the vison fluctuations restores the quantization of spin. A more complete theory for the vison fluctuations appears below in Section 3.4.4. 3.4.3 Semions and fermions Proceeding the identification of the present Schw… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Two ε particles undergoing an exchange: after traversing the path shown, a translation returns the ε particles to the original state. Each ε particle is a bound state of a vison (the m particle) and the sα bosonic spinon (the e particle). This process leads to a Berry phase of −1, when the moving e particle crosses the branch cut of the stationary m particle. 3.4.4 Complete Z2 gauge theory of spinons and … view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Phase diagram of ZZ2 in Eq. (63) obtained via sign-problem-free quantum Monte Carlo in Ref. [42]. term [35,36]. This is gapped state which preserves spin rotation invariance, but breaks lattice translational symmetry. The transition from the Z2 spin liquid to the VBS can be studied by integrating out the zα spinons from Eq. (63). This yields a Z2 gauge theory for the visons in terms of the Zi j alone. It … view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Phase diagram of the U(1) gauge theory with bosonic spinons, Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Background π flux acting on the spinons f , and also on the chargons B. to our results. The analysis is clearest upon introducing a matrix notation for the fermions Fi ≡  f i↑ −f i↓ f † i↓ f † i↑  (78) This matrix obeys the ‘reality’ condition F † i = σ yF T i σ y . (79) Now we can write Eq. (76) as Si = − 1 4 Tr(Fi σ zσ Tσ zF † i ). (80) The SU(2) gauge symmetry is now associated with a SU(2) matrix Vi… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Dispersion of fermionic spinons in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Three field-theoretical formulations of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: From Ref. [94]. Mean-Field phase diagram of Eq. (123) a function of the further neighbor interactions V11 and V22, extending that in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Properties of the Fermi liquid (FL) state. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Properties of the fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*) state. The results in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Cartoon pictures of different states of doped antiferromagnets; adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: From Ref. [115]. Dispersion of a single fermionic green dimer as a func￾tion of momentum k obtained by exact diagonalization of an effective quantum dimer model on a 8 × 8 lattice with periodic boundary conditions. Note that the dispersion is not symmetric about the magnetic Brillouin zone boundary i.e. across the line connecting (π, 0) to (0,π). 7.1.1 ADMR Recent ADMR observations [16,17] in the pseudoga… view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Illustration of the mapping from a single-band Hubbard model with de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Phases of the Ancilla Layer Model. The noted areas are fractions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Comparison of the phases of the Kondo lattice model and the Ancilla [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Spectral density of hole (left) and electron (right) pockets at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: Comparison between (a) the quantum dimer theory of the square lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: Summary of the FL phase of the Hubbard model obtained from the ALM, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_32.png] view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: Wavefunction of the FL* phase of the Hubbard model obtained from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_33.png] view at source ↗
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: The two distinct Higgs fields in the ancilla layer theory of the single band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_34.png] view at source ↗
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: (A) Cooper pairing the Fermi surface quasiparticles in FL* leads to d-SC* [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_35.png] view at source ↗
Figure 36
Figure 36. Figure 36: Metallic phases for the hole-doped cuprates as a function of doping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_36.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Two of the iconic phases of the hole-doped cuprate materials are the intermediate temperature pseudogap metal and the lower temperature $d$-wave superconductor. Following the suggestion of P. W. Anderson, there were early theories of these phases as doped quantum spin liquids. However, these theories have had difficulties with two prominent observations: (i) angle-dependent magnetoresistance measurements (ADMR) in the pseudogap metal, including observation of the Yamaji effect, present convincing evidence of small hole pockets which can tunnel coherently between square lattice layers (Fang et al., Nature Physics 18, 558 (2022); Chan et al., Nature Physics 21, 1753 (2025)) and (ii) the velocities of the nodal Bogoliubov quasiparticles in the $d$-wave superconductor are highly anisotropic, with $v_F \gg v_\Delta$ (Chiao et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, 3554 (2000)). These notes review how the fractionalized Fermi Liquid (FL*) state, which dopes quantum spin liquids with gauge-neutral electron-like quasiparticles, resolves both difficulties. Theories of insulating quantum spin liquids employing fractionalization of the electron spin into bosonic or fermionic partons are discussed. Doping the bosonic parton theory leads to a holon metal theory: while not appropriate for the cuprate pseudogap, this theory is argued to apply to ultracold atom experiments on the Lieb lattice. Doping the fermionic parton theory leads to a $d$-wave superconductor with nearly isotropic quasiparticle velocities. The construction of the FL* state in a single band Hubbard-type model is described using a quantum dimer model, followed by a more realistic description using the Ancilla Layer Model (ALM), which is then used to obtain the theory of the pseudogap and the $d$-wave superconductor. The ALM also leads to a wavefunction for the FL* state of the Hubbard model, which agrees with ultracold atom observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents lectures reviewing parton constructions for insulating quantum spin liquids (bosonic and fermionic), their doping into holon metals (applicable to ultracold atoms on the Lieb lattice) or d-wave superconductors, and the fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*) state constructed via the Ancilla Layer Model (ALM) in a Hubbard-type model. The central claim is that the FL* state resolves two key cuprate observations: small hole pockets with coherent interlayer tunneling matching ADMR and Yamaji effect data, and highly anisotropic nodal Bogoliubov velocities (v_F ≫ v_Δ) in the d-wave superconductor.

Significance. If the FL* and ALM constructions are valid, the work offers a unified gauge-theoretic framework for the pseudogap metal and d-wave superconductor in hole-doped cuprates, synthesizing fractionalization with gauge-neutral quasiparticles and providing connections to ultracold atom experiments. This addresses longstanding experimental tensions through explicit theoretical constructions rather than phenomenology alone.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and ALM construction] Abstract and ALM construction section: The resolution of small hole pockets and v_F ≫ v_Δ anisotropy is load-bearing on the ALM, yet the manuscript does not derive the ancilla layer from the single-band Hubbard Hamiltonian or demonstrate that the projection to the physical band preserves pocket topology and velocity ratio without uncontrolled gauge fluctuations or fine-tuning.
  2. [Doping fermionic parton theory to FL*] Doping fermionic parton theory to FL* section: The claim that FL* produces highly anisotropic nodal velocities (contrasted with nearly isotropic velocities from direct fermionic parton doping) is asserted via the gauge-neutral quasiparticles, but no explicit equations or dispersion derivations are provided showing how the ALM enforces v_F ≫ v_Δ.
minor comments (1)
  1. [References] References to experimental works (Fang et al., Chan et al., Chiao et al.) should include full citations with DOIs or arXiv numbers for reader accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our lecture notes. The points raised regarding the foundations of the Ancilla Layer Model and the explicit velocity derivations are well taken. We have revised the manuscript to add clarifications on the model assumptions and to include the requested dispersion equations. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and ALM construction section: The resolution of small hole pockets and v_F ≫ v_Δ anisotropy is load-bearing on the ALM, yet the manuscript does not derive the ancilla layer from the single-band Hubbard Hamiltonian or demonstrate that the projection to the physical band preserves pocket topology and velocity ratio without uncontrolled gauge fluctuations or fine-tuning.

    Authors: The ALM is introduced as an effective construction for realizing the FL* state in a Hubbard-type model, building upon the quantum dimer model. A direct microscopic derivation from the single-band Hubbard Hamiltonian is not provided, as the lectures emphasize the gauge-theoretic framework and its ability to address experimental observations. In the revised manuscript we have added a clarifying paragraph on the projection procedure, noting that pocket topology is preserved when the ancilla layer gaps the gauge fluctuations. We acknowledge that a fully controlled demonstration without residual gauge effects or parameter tuning remains an open question requiring further work beyond these notes. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Doping fermionic parton theory to FL* section: The claim that FL* produces highly anisotropic nodal velocities (contrasted with nearly isotropic velocities from direct fermionic parton doping) is asserted via the gauge-neutral quasiparticles, but no explicit equations or dispersion derivations are provided showing how the ALM enforces v_F ≫ v_Δ.

    Authors: We agree that explicit derivations strengthen the presentation. The revised section now includes the effective Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian for the gauge-neutral quasiparticles arising from the ALM. The dispersion yields v_F set by the physical-layer hopping t while v_Δ is suppressed by the spinon pairing scale Δ inherited from the underlying quantum spin liquid, producing v_F ≫ v_Δ. This is contrasted with direct fermionic parton doping, where both velocities remain comparable; the explicit equations and resulting velocity ratio are shown in the updated text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

FL* and ALM constructions reduce to self-cited prior mappings; pocket topology and velocity anisotropy are by model definition.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract, paragraph on ALM construction]
    "The construction of the FL* state in a single band Hubbard-type model is described using a quantum dimer model, followed by a more realistic description using the Ancilla Layer Model (ALM), which is then used to obtain the theory of the pseudogap and the d-wave superconductor."

    The ALM is invoked to produce small hole pockets with coherent interlayer tunneling and the anisotropic Bogoliubov velocities, yet the mapping from the physical Hubbard model to the ancilla layer (and the subsequent projection) is not re-derived; it is taken from prior self-citations. Once the ALM is accepted, the pocket structure and v_F/v_Δ ratio are fixed by construction in the effective theory, making the claimed resolution of ADMR and ARPES data circular with respect to those earlier definitions.

  2. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Section on doping fermionic parton theory to FL*]
    "Doping the fermionic parton theory leads to a d-wave superconductor with nearly isotropic quasiparticle velocities. ... The ALM also leads to a wavefunction for the FL* state of the Hubbard model, which agrees with ultracold atom observations."

    The 'nearly isotropic' velocities in the d-wave state and the small-pocket topology are presented as predictions, but they follow directly from the parton construction and ALM ansatz imported via self-citation. The ultracold-atom agreement is used to anchor the model, yet the specific velocity anisotropy ratio v_F ≫ v_Δ and the coherent interlayer tunneling are outputs of the same self-defined framework rather than independent derivations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim that FL* resolves ADMR small pockets and v_F ≫ v_Δ anisotropy rests on the ALM augmentation of the Hubbard model. This augmentation and the resulting Fermi surface are introduced via self-citations to earlier Sachdev-group works rather than derived from the single-band Hamiltonian in the present notes. The ultracold-atom agreement is cited as external support, but the load-bearing step (projection preserving pocket topology without uncontrolled gauge fluctuations) is not independently verified here and reduces to the ansatz imported from those citations. This produces partial circularity: the 'resolution' of the two experimental tensions is forced once the ALM is accepted, but the acceptance itself is not re-derived.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on parton fractionalization and gauge neutrality assumptions standard in the QSL literature, plus the specific ALM construction whose validity is taken as given for the Hubbard model.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Electron spin fractionalizes into bosonic or fermionic partons with emergent gauge fields
    Invoked throughout the discussion of insulating QSLs and their doping into FL* and holon metals.
  • domain assumption The Ancilla Layer Model faithfully captures the low-energy physics of the single-band Hubbard model
    Used to obtain the FL* wavefunction and its agreement with ultracold atom data.
invented entities (1)
  • Fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*) state no independent evidence
    purpose: Doped state with gauge-neutral electron-like quasiparticles that produces small hole pockets and resolves ADMR and velocity data
    Central theoretical construct introduced to reconcile spin liquid doping with cuprate observations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5690 in / 1540 out tokens · 23821 ms · 2026-05-16T19:45:53.230605+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Monte Carlo fermion spectroscopy of a non-compact CP$^1$ model

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    QMC simulations of a hedgehog-suppressed electron-boson model show the electron gap resembles mean-field AF dispersion while preserving symmetries.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

168 extracted references · 168 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 78 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Large N expansion for frustrated quantum antiferromagnets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1773

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.1773 1991

  2. [2]

    X. G. Wen, Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders, Phys. Rev. B 44, 2664 (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.2664

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.2664 1991

  3. [3]

    Sachdev, Kagome and triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnets: Ordering from quantum fluctuations and quantum-disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons , Phys

    S. Sachdev, Kagome and triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnets: Ordering from quantum fluctuations and quantum-disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons , Phys. Rev. B 45, 12377 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.45.12377

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.45.12377 1992

  4. [4]

    A. Y. Kitaev , Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons , Annals of Physics 303(1), 2 (2003), doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0, quant-ph/9707021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 2003

  5. [5]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Valence-bond and spin-Peierls ground states of low-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1694 (1989), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1694

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.1694 1989

  6. [6]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Spin-Peierls, valence-bond solid, and N\'eel ground states of low-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets , Phys. Rev. B 42, 4568 (1990), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.42.4568

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.42.4568 1990

  7. [7]

    Affleck and J

    I. Affleck and J. B. Marston, Large- n limit of the Heisenberg-Hubbard model: Implications for high- T _ c superconductors , Phys. Rev. B 37, 3774 (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3774

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.3774 1988

  8. [8]

    Affleck, Z

    I. Affleck, Z. Zou, T. Hsu and P. W. Anderson, SU(2) gauge symmetry of the large- U limit of the Hubbard model , Phys. Rev. B 38, 745 (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.38.745

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.38.745 1988

  9. [9]

    Dagotto, E

    E. Dagotto, E. Fradkin and A. Moreo, SU(2) gauge invariance and order parameters in strongly coupled electronic systems , Phys. Rev. B 38, 2926 (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.38.2926

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.38.2926 1988

  10. [10]

    Theory of Underdoped Cuprates

    X.-G. Wen and P. A. Lee , Theory of Underdoped Cuprates , Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(3), 503 (1996), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.503, cond-mat/9506065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.503 1996

  11. [11]

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu and T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: symmetries and dualities , Phys. Rev. X 7(3), 031051 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031051, 1703.02426

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.031051 2017

  12. [12]

    Y. Fang, G. Grissonnanche, A. Legros, S. Verret, F. Lalibert \'e , C. Collignon, A. Ataei, M. Dion, J. Zhou, D. Graf, M. J. Lawler, P. A. Goddard et al., Fermi surface transformation at the pseudogap critical point of a cuprate superconductor, Nature Physics 18(5), 558 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01514-1, 2004.01725

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01514-1 2022

  13. [13]

    M. K. Chan , K. A. Schreiber , O. E. Ayala-Valenzuela , E. D. Bauer , A. Shekhter and N. Harrison , Observation of the Yamaji effect in a cuprate superconductor , Nature Physics 21(11), 1753 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41567-025-03032-2, 2411.10631

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-03032-2 2025

  14. [14]

    Low-Energy Quasiparticles in Cuprate Superconductors: A Quantitative Analysis

    M. Chiao , R. W. Hill , C. Lupien , L. Taillefer , P. Lambert , R. Gagnon and P. Fournier , Low-energy quasiparticles in cuprate superconductors: A quantitative analysis , Phys. Rev. B 62(5), 3554 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.3554, cond-mat/9910367

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.3554 2000

  15. [15]

    Fractionalized Fermi liquids

    T. Senthil , S. Sachdev and M. Vojta , Fractionalized Fermi Liquids , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(21), 216403 (2003), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.216403, cond-mat/0209144

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.216403 2003

  16. [16]

    Weak magnetism and non-Fermi liquids near heavy-fermion critical points

    T. Senthil , M. Vojta and S. Sachdev , Weak magnetism and non-Fermi liquids near heavy-fermion critical points , Phys. Rev. B 69(3), 035111 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.69.035111, cond-mat/0305193

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.035111 2004

  17. [17]

    Ferrari and F

    F. Ferrari and F. Becca , Gapless spin liquid and valence-bond solid in the J _ 1 -J _ 2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice: Insights from singlet and triplet excitations , Phys. Rev. B 102(1), 014417 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014417, 2005.12941

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.014417 2020

  18. [18]

    Nomura and M

    Y. Nomura and M. Imada , Dirac-Type Nodal Spin Liquid Revealed by Refined Quantum Many-Body Solver Using Neural-Network Wave Function, Correlation Ratio, and Level Spectroscopy , Physical Review X 11(3), 031034 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031034, 2005.14142

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031034 2021

  19. [19]

    W.-Y. Liu , D. Poilblanc , S.-S. Gong , W.-Q. Chen and Z.-C. Gu , Tensor network study of the spin-1/2 square-lattice J _ 1 -J _ 2 -J _ 3 model: Incommensurate spiral order, mixed valence-bond solids, and multicritical points , Phys. Rev. B 109(23), 235116 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.235116, 2309.13301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.235116 2024

  20. [20]

    Takahashi , H

    J. Takahashi , H. Shao , B. Zhao , W. Guo and A. W. Sandvik , SO(5) multicriticality in two-dimensional quantum magnets , arXiv e-prints (2024), 2405.06607

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    D. P. Arovas and A. Auerbach, Functional integral theories of low-dimensional quantum Heisenberg models , Phys. Rev. B 38, 316 (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.38.316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.38.316 1988

  22. [22]

    "Deconfined" quantum critical points

    T. Senthil , A. Vishwanath , L. Balents , S. Sachdev and M. P. A. Fisher , Deconfined Quantum Critical Points , Science 303, 1490 (2004), doi:10.1126/science.1091806, cond-mat/0311326

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1126/science.1091806 2004

  23. [23]

    Quantum criticality beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm

    T. Senthil , L. Balents , S. Sachdev , A. Vishwanath and M. P. A. Fisher , Quantum criticality beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm , Phys. Rev. B 70(14), 144407 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.144407, cond-mat/0312617

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.144407 2004

  24. [24]

    Y. Huh , M. Punk and S. Sachdev , Vison states and confinement transitions of Z _ 2 spin liquids on the kagome lattice , Phys. Rev. B 84(9), 094419 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.094419, 1106.3330

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.094419 2011

  25. [25]

    Y. Huh , L. Fritz and S. Sachdev , Quantum criticality of the kagome antiferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions , Phys. Rev. B 81(14), 144432 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.144432, 1003.0891

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.144432 2010

  26. [26]

    A. O. Scheie , E. A. Ghioldi , J. Xing , J. A. M. Paddison , N. E. Sherman , M. Dupont , L. D. Sanjeewa , S. Lee , A. J. Woods , D. Abernathy , D. M. Pajerowski , T. J. Williams et al., Proximate spin liquid and fractionalization in the triangular antiferromagnet KYbSe _ 2 , Nature Physics 20(1), 74 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02259-1, 2109.11527

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02259-1 2024

  27. [27]

    A. O. Scheie , M. Lee , K. Wang , P. Laurell , E. S. Choi , D. Pajerowski , Q. Zhang , J. Ma , H. D. Zhou , S. Lee , S. M. Thomas , M. O. Ajeesh et al., Spectrum and low-energy gap in triangular quantum spin liquid NaYbSe _2 , arXiv e-prints arXiv:2406.17773 (2024), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.17773, 2406.17773

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.17773 2024

  28. [28]

    Topological Enrichment of Luttinger's Theorem

    P. Bonderson , M. Cheng , K. Patel and E. Plamadeala , Topological Enrichment of Luttinger's Theorem , arXiv e-prints arXiv:1601.07902 (2016), doi:10.48550/arXiv.1601.07902, 1601.07902

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1601.07902 2016

  29. [29]

    D. V. Else and T. Senthil , Strange Metals as Ersatz Fermi Liquids , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(8), 086601 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.086601, 2010.10523

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.086601 2021

  30. [30]

    R. A. Jalabert and S. Sachdev, Spontaneous alignment of frustrated bonds in an anisotropic, three-dimensional Ising model , Phys. Rev. B 44, 686 (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.686

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.686 1991

  31. [31]

    Sachdev and M

    S. Sachdev and M. Vojta , Translational symmetry breaking in two-dimensional antiferromagnets and superconductors , J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 69 , Supp. B, 1 (1999), cond-mat/9910231

    work page arXiv 1999

  32. [32]

    Symmetric $Z_2$ spin liquids and their neighboring phases on triangular lattice

    Y.-M. Lu , Symmetric Z _ 2 spin liquids and their neighboring phases on triangular lattice , Phys. Rev. B 93(16), 165113 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.165113, 1505.06495

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.165113 2016

  33. [33]

    Schwinger boson spin liquid states on square lattice

    X. Yang and F. Wang , Schwinger boson spin-liquid states on square lattice , Phys. Rev. B 94(3), 035160 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.035160, 1507.07621

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.035160 2016

  34. [34]

    Fermionic spinon theory of square lattice spin liquids near the N\'eel state

    A. Thomson and S. Sachdev , Fermionic Spinon Theory of Square Lattice Spin Liquids near the N \'e el State , Physical Review X 8(1), 011012 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011012, 1708.04626

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.011012 2018

  35. [35]

    Y.-M. Lu, G. Y. Cho and A. Vishwanath, Unification of bosonic and fermionic theories of spin liquids on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205150 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205150, 1403.0575

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.205150 2017

  36. [36]

    Bond and Neel order and fractionalization in ground states of easy-plane antiferromagnets in two dimensions

    K. Park and S. Sachdev , Bond and N \'e el order and fractionalization in ground states of easy-plane antiferromagnets in two dimensions , Phys. Rev. B 65(22), 220405 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.220405, cond-mat/0112003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.220405 2002

  37. [37]

    Shackleton and S

    L. Shackleton and S. Sachdev , Sign-problem-free effective models of triangular lattice quantum antiferromagnets , Phys. Rev. B 111(7), 075101 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.075101, 2311.01572

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.075101 2025

  38. [38]

    Z_2 Gauge Theory of Electron Fractionalization in Strongly Correlated Systems

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher , Z _ 2 gauge theory of electron fractionalization in strongly correlated systems , Phys. Rev. B 62(12), 7850 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.7850, cond-mat/9910224

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.7850 2000

  39. [39]

    A. V. Chubukov , T. Senthil and S. Sachdev , Universal magnetic properties of frustrated quantum antiferromagnets in two dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2089 (1994), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2089, cond-mat/9311045

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.2089 2089

  40. [40]

    A. V. Chubukov , S. Sachdev and T. Senthil , Quantum phase transitions in frustrated quantum antiferromagnets , Nucl. Phys. B 426, 601 (1994), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90023-X, cond-mat/9402006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90023-x 1994

  41. [41]

    Transition from the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ spin liquid to antiferromagnetic order: spectrum on the torus

    S. Whitsitt and S. Sachdev , Transition from the Z _ 2 spin liquid to antiferromagnetic order: Spectrum on the torus , Phys. Rev. B 94(8), 085134 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085134, 1603.05652

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.085134 2016

  42. [42]

    Song, Y.-C

    X.-Y. Song, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath and C. Wang, From spinon band topology to the symmetry quantum numbers of monopoles in Dirac spin liquids , Phys. Rev. X 10(1), 011033 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011033, 1811.11182

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.011033 2020

  43. [43]

    Song , C

    X.-Y. Song , C. Wang , A. Vishwanath and Y.-C. He , Unifying description of competing orders in two-dimensional quantum magnets , Nature Communications 10, 4254 (2019), doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11727-3, 1811.11186

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11727-3 2019

  44. [44]

    Wietek , S

    A. Wietek , S. Capponi and A. M. L \"a uchli , Quantum Electrodynamics in 2 +1 Dimensions as the Organizing Principle of a Triangular Lattice Antiferromagnet , Physical Review X 14(2), 021010 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021010, 2303.01585

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.021010 2024

  45. [45]

    Willsher and J

    J. Willsher and J. Knolle , Dynamics and stability of U(1) spin liquids beyond mean-field theory: Triangular-lattice J_1 - J_2 Heisenberg model , arXiv e-prints arXiv:2503.13831 (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.13831, 2503.13831

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.13831 2025

  46. [46]

    Sachdev and R

    S. Sachdev and R. Jalabert, Effective lattice models for two-dimensional antiferromagnets, Modern Physics Letters B 04(16), 1043 (1990), doi:10.1142/S0217984990001318

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217984990001318 1990

  47. [47]

    Emergent $SO(5)$ Symmetry at the N\'eel to Valence-Bond-Solid Transition

    A. Nahum, P. Serna, J. T. Chalker, M. Ortu\ no and A. M. Somoza, Emergent SO(5) Symmetry at the N\'eel to Valence-Bond-Solid Transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(26), 267203 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.267203, 1508.06668

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.267203 2015

  48. [48]

    Chen , X

    B.-B. Chen , X. Zhang , Y. Wang , K. Sun and Z. Y. Meng , Phases of (2+1) D SO(5) Nonlinear Sigma Model with a Topological Term on a Sphere: Multicritical Point and Disorder Phase , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(24), 246503 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.246503, 2307.05307

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.246503 2024

  49. [49]

    S. M. Chester and N. Su, Bootstrapping Deconfined Quantum Tricriticality , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(11), 111601 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.111601, 2310.08343

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.111601 2024

  50. [50]

    Zhou , L

    Z. Zhou , L. Hu , W. Zhu and Y.-C. He , SO(5) Deconfined Phase Transition under the Fuzzy-Sphere Microscope: Approximate Conformal Symmetry, Pseudo-Criticality, and Operator Spectrum , Physical Review X 14(2), 021044 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021044, 2306.16435

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.021044 2024

  51. [51]

    Coleman and N

    P. Coleman and N. Andrei, Kondo-stabilised spin liquids and heavy fermion superconductivity, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 1(26), 4057 (1989), doi:10.1088/0953-8984/1/26/003

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/1/26/003 1989

  52. [52]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity , Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17, cond-mat/0410445

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.17 2006

  53. [53]

    Monopole Quantum Numbers in the Staggered Flux Spin Liquid

    J. Alicea , Monopole quantum numbers in the staggered flux spin liquid , Phys. Rev. B 78(3), 035126 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.78.035126, 0804.0786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.035126 2008

  54. [54]

    Continuous quantum phase transitions beyond Landau's paradigm in a large-N spin model

    Y. Ran and X.-g. Wen , Continuous quantum phase transitions beyond Landau's paradigm in a large-N spin model , arXiv e-prints cond-mat/0609620 (2006), doi:10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0609620, cond-mat/0609620

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0609620 2006

  55. [55]

    A. G. Abanov and P. B. Wiegmann, Theta terms in nonlinear sigma models , Nucl. Phys. B 570, 685 (2000), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00820-2, hep-th/9911025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00820-2 2000

  56. [56]

    Lee and S

    J. Lee and S. Sachdev , Wess-Zumino-Witten Terms in Graphene Landau Levels , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(22), 226801 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.226801, 1411.5684

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.226801 2015

  57. [57]

    Many-body spin Berry phases emerging from the $\pi$-flux state: antiferromagnetic/valence-bond-solid competition

    A. Tanaka and X. Hu , Many-Body Spin Berry Phases Emerging from the -Flux State: Competition between Antiferromagnetism and the Valence-Bond-Solid State , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(3), 036402 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.036402, cond-mat/0501365

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.036402 2005

  58. [58]

    Competing orders, non-linear sigma models, and topological terms in quantum magnets

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher , Competing orders, nonlinear sigma models, and topological terms in quantum magnets , Phys. Rev. B 74(6), 064405 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.064405, cond-mat/0510459

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.064405 2006

  59. [59]

    Characterization of quantum spin liquids and their spinon band structures via functional renormalization

    M. Hering , J. Sonnenschein , Y. Iqbal and J. Reuther , Characterization of quantum spin liquids and their spinon band structures via functional renormalization , Phys. Rev. B 99(10), 100405 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.100405, 1806.05021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.100405 2019

  60. [60]

    Ferrimagnetism of ultracold fermions in a multi-band Hubbard system

    M. Lebrat , A. Kale , L. Haldar Kendrick , M. Xu , Y. Gang , A. Nikolaenko , P. M. Bonetti , S. Sachdev and M. Greiner , Ferrimagnetism of ultracold fermions in a multi-band Hubbard system , arXiv e-prints arXiv:2404.17555 (2024), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.17555, 2404.17555

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.17555 2024

  61. [61]

    Nikolaenko , P

    A. Nikolaenko , P. M. Bonetti , A. Kale , M. Lebrat , M. Greiner and S. Sachdev , Canted magnetism and Z_2 fractionalization in metallic states of the Lieb lattice Hubbard model near quarter filling , Phys. Rev. B 112(4), 045129 (2025), doi:10.1103/l9xn-h95s, 2502.12235

    work page doi:10.1103/l9xn-h95s 2025

  62. [62]

    B. I. Shraiman and E. D. Siggia, Mobile Vacancies in a Quantum Heisenberg Antiferromagnet , Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 467 (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.467

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.467 1988

  63. [63]

    H. J. Schulz, Effective action for strongly correlated fermions from functional integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2462 (1990), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2462

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.2462 1990

  64. [64]

    Spin fluctuations and pseudogap in the two-dimensional half-filled Hubbard model at weak coupling

    N. Dupuis , Spin fluctuations and pseudogap in the two-dimensional half-filled Hubbard model at weak coupling , Phys. Rev. B 65(24), 245118 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.245118, cond-mat/0110138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.245118 2002

  65. [65]

    Antiferromagnetism and single-particle properties in the two-dimensional half-filled Hubbard model: a non-linear sigma model approach

    K. Borejsza and N. Dupuis , Antiferromagnetism and single-particle properties in the two-dimensional half-filled Hubbard model: A nonlinear sigma model approach , Phys. Rev. B 69(8), 085119 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.69.085119, cond-mat/0307238

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.085119 2004

  66. [67]

    Higgs criticality in a two-dimensional metal

    D. Chowdhury and S. Sachdev , Higgs criticality in a two-dimensional metal , Phys. Rev. B 91(11), 115123 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.115123, 1412.1086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.115123 2015

  67. [68]

    The enigma of the pseudogap phase of the cuprate superconductors

    D. Chowdhury and S. Sachdev , The Enigma of the Pseudogap Phase of the Cuprate Superconductors , In J. Jedrzejewski , ed., Quantum criticality in condensed matter, 50th Karpacz Winter School of Theoretical Physics, pp. 1--43. World Scientific , doi:10.1142/9789814704090_0001 (2015), 1501.00002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789814704090_0001 2015

  68. [69]

    Intertwining topological order and broken symmetry in a theory of fluctuating spin density waves

    S. Chatterjee, S. Sachdev and M. Scheurer, Intertwining topological order and broken symmetry in a theory of fluctuating spin density waves , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(22), 227002 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.227002, 1705.06289

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.227002 2017

  69. [70]

    M. S. Scheurer and S. Sachdev , Orbital currents in insulating and doped antiferromagnets , Phys. Rev. B 98(23), 235126 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235126, 1808.04826

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.235126 2018

  70. [71]

    Gauge theory for the cuprates near optimal doping

    S. Sachdev, H. D. Scammell, M. S. Scheurer and G. Tarnopolsky, Gauge theory for the cuprates near optimal doping , Phys. Rev. B 99(5), 054516 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.054516, 1811.04930

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.054516 2019

  71. [72]

    P. M. Bonetti and W. Metzner , SU(2) gauge theory of the pseudogap phase in the two-dimensional Hubbard model , Phys. Rev. B 106(20), 205152 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.205152, 2207.00829

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.205152 2022

  72. [73]

    Scholle , P

    R. Scholle , P. M. Bonetti , D. Vilardi and W. Metzner , Comprehensive mean-field analysis of magnetic and charge orders in the two-dimensional Hubbard model , Phys. Rev. B 108(3), 035139 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.035139, 2303.15358

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.035139 2023

  73. [74]

    Christos , L

    M. Christos , L. Shackleton , S. Sachdev and Z.-X. Luo , Deconfined quantum criticality of nodal d -wave superconductivity, N \'e el order, and charge order on the square lattice at half-filling , Physical Review Research 6(3), 033018 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033018, 2402.09502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033018 2024

  74. [75]

    F. F. Assaad , M. Imada and D. J. Scalapino , Quantum Transition between an Antiferromagnetic Mott Insulator and d_ x^2-y^2 Superconductor in Two Dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(22), 4592 (1996), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4592, cond-mat/9609034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.4592 1996

  75. [76]

    G \"o tz , S

    A. G \"o tz , S. Beyl , M. Hohenadler and F. F. Assaad , Valence-bond solid to antiferromagnet transition in the two-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model by Langevin dynamics , Phys. Rev. B 105(8), 085151 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.085151, 2102.08899

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.085151 2022

  76. [77]

    G \"o tz , M

    A. G \"o tz , M. Hohenadler and F. F. Assaad , Phases and exotic phase transitions of a two-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model , Phys. Rev. B 109(19), 195154 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.195154, 2307.07613

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.195154 2024

  77. [78]

    G \"o tz , F

    A. G \"o tz , F. F. Assaad and N. C. Costa , Tuning the order of a deconfined quantum critical point , arXiv e-prints arXiv:2412.17215 (2024), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.17215, 2412.17215

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.17215 2024

  78. [79]

    X. Y. Xu and T. Grover, Competing Nodal d -Wave Superconductivity and Antiferromagnetism , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(21), 217002 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.217002, 2009.06644

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.217002 2021

  79. [80]

    B. Xing, W. Chiu, D. Poletti, R. T. Scalettar and G. G. Batrouni, Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations of the 2D Su‑Schrieffer‑Heeger Model , Physical Review Letters 126(1), 017601 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.017601, 2005.09673

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.017601 2021

  80. [81]

    C. Feng, B. Xing, D. Poletti, R. T. Scalettar and G. G. Batrouni, Phase Diagram of the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger–Hubbard model on a square lattice , Physical Review B 106(8), L081114 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L081114, 2109.09206

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.l081114 2022

Showing first 80 references.